lab1

First Incident Response Guidance Document (40%)

Excellent

Outstanding

Acceptable

Needs Improvement

Needs Significant Improvement

Missing or Unacceptable

Title, Tool Identification, Description of the Tool

10 points

Provided an acceptable title and accurate tool identification (name). Provided an excellent description which clearly, concisely, and accurately described the tool’s features and capabilities.

8.5 points

Provided an acceptable title and accurate tool identification (name). Provided an outstanding description which clearly and accurately described the tool’s features and capabilities.

7 points

Provided an acceptable title and accurate tool identification (name). Provided an acceptable description which described the tool’s features and capabilities.

6 points

Provided an acceptable title and accurate tool identification (name). Provided a description but this paragraph did not adequately address tool’s features and capabilities.

4 points

Provided a title and brief description. Description lacked details or was incorrect / inadequate. OR, this section was not well supported by authoritative sources.

0 points

Sections were missing OR no work submitted.

Recommended Uses of the Tool During Incident Response Phases of the Tool During Incident Response Phases

15 points

Provided an excellent description of how this tool can be used to support the Incident Response Process for the phases listed in the lab assignment. Listed and briefly explained 5 or more appropriate uses.

13 points

Provided an outstanding description of how this tool can be used to support the Incident Response Process for the phases listed in the lab assignment. Listed and briefly explained 4 or more appropriate uses.

11 points

Provided an acceptable description of how this tool can be used to support the Incident Response. Listed and briefly explained at least one appropriate use for each phase listed in the assignment.

8 points

Provided a brief description of how this tool can be used to support the Incident Response. Mentioned uses of the tool in at least one of the phases listed in the assignment.

4 points

Description of tool use for incident response lacked details or was incorrect / inadequate. OR, this section was not well supported by authoritative sources.

0 points

This section was missing or not relevant to the assignment.

Notes, Warnings, & Restrictions

10 points

Provided an excellent "notes, warnings, and restrictions" section with clear, concise, and accurate information to aid the reader in understanding what should or should not be done when using this procedure.

8.5 points

Provided an outstanding "notes, warnings, and restrictions" section with clear and accurate information to aid the reader in understanding what should or should not be done when using this procedure.

7 points

Provided an adequate "notes, warnings, and restrictions" section which included information about what should or should not be done when using this procedure.

6 points

Provided a "notes, warnings, and restrictions" section which provided some information about the harm that could occur when using this procedure.

4 points

Section present but content was severely lacking in detail, inappropriate, or grossly inaccurate. OR, this section was not well supported by authoritative sources.

0 points

Section was missing or blank.

Resources

5 points

Provided an excellent resources section which described and listed three or more relevant resource documents; section also included complete publication information (reference list entry) for all cited sources.

4 points

Provided an outstanding resources section which described and listed two or more relevant resource documents; section also included complete publication information (reference list entry) for all cited sources.

3 points

Provided a resources section which listed  publication information (reference list entry) for two or more relevant resource documents.

2 points

Provided a resources section which mentioned two or more source documents or Internet resources containing relevant information.

1 point

Provided a resources section which mentioned at least one relevant source document or Internet resource.

0 points

Section was missing or blank.

Second Incident Response Guidance Document (40%)

Excellent

Outstanding

Acceptable

Needs Improvement

Needs Significant Improvement

Missing or Unacceptable

Title, Tool Identification, Description of the Tool

10 points

Provided an acceptable title and accurate tool identification (name). Provided an excellent description which clearly, concisely, and accurately described the tool’s features and capabilities.

8.5 points

Provided an acceptable title and accurate tool identification (name). Provided an outstanding description which clearly and accurately described the tool’s features and capabilities.

7 points

Provided an acceptable title and accurate tool identification (name). Provided an acceptable description which described the tool’s features and capabilities.

6 points

Provided an acceptable title and accurate tool identification (name). Provided a description but this paragraph did not adequately address tool’s features and capabilities.

4 points

Provided a title and brief description. Description lacked details or was incorrect / inadequate. OR, this section was not well supported by authoritative sources.

0 points

Sections were missing OR no work submitted.

Recommended Uses of the Tool During Incident Response Phases

15 points

Provided an excellent description of how this tool can be used to support the Incident Response Process for the phases listed in the lab assignment. Listed and briefly explained 5 or more appropriate uses.

13 points

Provided an outstanding description of how this tool can be used to support the Incident Response Process for the phases listed in the lab assignment. Listed and briefly explained 4 or more appropriate uses.

11 points

Provided an acceptable description of how this tool can be used to support the Incident Response. Listed and briefly explained at least one appropriate use for each phase listed in the assignment.

8 points

Provided a brief description of how this tool can be used to support the Incident Response. Mentioned uses of the tool in at least one of the phases listed in the assignment.

4 points

Description of tool use for incident response lacked details or was incorrect / inadequate. OR, this section was not well supported by authoritative sources.

0 points

This section was missing or not relevant to the assignment.

Notes, Warnings, & Restrictions

10 points

Provided an excellent "notes, warnings, and restrictions" section with clear, concise, and accurate information to aid the reader in understanding what should or should not be done when using this procedure.

8.5 points

Provided an outstanding "notes, warnings, and restrictions" section with clear and accurate information to aid the reader in understanding what should or should not be done when using this procedure.

7 points

Provided an adequate "notes, warnings, and restrictions" section which included information about what should or should not be done when using this procedure.

6 points

Provided a "notes, warnings, and restrictions" section which provided some information about the harm that could occur when using this procedure.

4 points

Section present but content was severely lacking in detail, inappropriate, or grossly inaccurate. OR, this section was not well supported by authoritative sources.

0 points

Section was missing or blank.

Resources

5 points

Provided an excellent resources section which described and listed three or more relevant resource documents; section also included complete publication information (reference list entry) for all cited sources.

4 points

Provided an outstanding resources section which described and listed two or more relevant resource documents; section also included complete publication information (reference list entry) for all cited sources.

3 points

Provided a resources section which listed publication information (reference list entry) for two or more relevant resource documents.

2 points

Provided a resources section which mentioned two or more source documents or Internet resources containing relevant information.

1 point

Provided a resources section which mentioned at least one relevant source document or Internet resource.

0 points

Section was missing or blank.

Professionalism (20%)

Excellent

Outstanding

Acceptable

Needs Improvement

Needs Significant Improvement

Missing or Unacceptable

Organization & Appearance

10 points

Submitted work shows excellent organization. The use of color, fonts, titles, headings and sub-headings, etc. is appropriate to the assignment type.

8.5 points

Submitted work has minor style or formatting flaws but still presents a professional appearance. Submitted work is well organized and appropriately uses color, fonts, and section headings (per the assignment’s directions).

7 points

Organization and/or appearance of submitted work could be improved through better use of fonts, color, titles, headings, etc. OR Submitted work has multiple style or formatting errors. Professional appearance could be improved.

6 points

Submitted work has multiple style or formatting errors. Organization and professional appearance need substantial improvement.

4 points

Submitted work meets minimum requirements but has major style and formatting errors. Work is disorganized and needs to be rewritten for readability and professional appearance.

0 points

No work submitted for this assignment.

Execution

10 points

No formatting, grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors.

8.5 points

Work contains minor errors in formatting, grammar, spelling or punctuation which do not significantly impact professional appearance.

7 points

Errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, or punctuation which detract from professional appearance of the submitted work.

6 points

Submitted work has numerous errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Work is unprofessional in appearance.

4 points

Submitted work is difficult to read / understand and has significant errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, punctuation, or word usage.

0 points

No work submitted for this assignment.

Overall Score

Excellent 100 or more

Outstanding 90 or more

Acceptable 75 or more

Needs Improvement 65 or more

Needs Significant Improvement 50 or more

Missing / Unacceptable 0 or more