Both gospels of Matthew and Mark, illustrating the story of Jesus’s death told from different perspectives. However when you read over the final chapters in both gospels. Matthew paints the story of Jesus as an illustration of wonder and in awe of who Jesus was as a man putting a better spin. Mark’s portrayal is vivid and blunt straight to the point showing how there was a misunderstanding of Jesus as a man. For example in both gospels, Jesus cries out to God right before his death, but in Matthew 27:50, Matthew writes that Jesus cries out again. In the conclusion of Mark you are left off with both Marys witnessing the Angel, leaving a since of peace in our minds. In conclusion of Mathew we have the actual reincarnation of Jesus and showing that he had risen again and fulfilling the prophecies.
Raven Jefferson
The way that both Mark and Matthew view Jesus is different,
Mark view Jesus as a miracle worker and Matthew view him as a
teacher. Though they both essentially contain the same stories
and events they are slightly different in my opinion.
From Mark
1:1 th
ru 8:29 there is focus on the ministry of Jesus while he is
an adult a miracle worker attracting big crowds where as
Matthew is the inclusion of Jesus as an infant. In Mark's gospel
Jesus is silent and mocked and cries out in despair at the end.
Matthew de
scribed earthquakes and the rising of the dead these
are things no one else witnessed.
Darryl Jones
Both gospels of Matthew and Mark, illustrating the story of
Jesus’s death told from different perspectives. However
when
you read over the final chapters in both gospels. Matthew paints
the story of Jesus as an illustration of wonder and in awe of who
Jesus was as a man putting a better spin. Mark’s portrayal is
vivid and
blunt straight to the point showing how there w
as a
misunderstanding of Jesus as a man. For example in both
gospels, Jesus cries out to God right before his death, but in
Matthew 27:50, Matthew writes that Jesus cries out again. In the
conclusion of Mark you are left off with both Marys witnessing
the
Angel, leaving a since of peace in our minds. In
conclusion
of Mathew we have the actual reincarnation of Jesus
Raven Jefferson
The way that both Mark and Matthew view Jesus is different,
Mark view Jesus as a miracle worker and Matthew view him as a
teacher. Though they both essentially contain the same stories
and events they are slightly different in my opinion. From Mark
1:1 thru 8:29 there is focus on the ministry of Jesus while he is
an adult a miracle worker attracting big crowds where as
Matthew is the inclusion of Jesus as an infant. In Mark's gospel
Jesus is silent and mocked and cries out in despair at the end.
Matthew described earthquakes and the rising of the dead these
are things no one else witnessed.
Darryl Jones
Both gospels of Matthew and Mark, illustrating the story of
Jesus’s death told from different perspectives. However when
you read over the final chapters in both gospels. Matthew paints
the story of Jesus as an illustration of wonder and in awe of who
Jesus was as a man putting a better spin. Mark’s portrayal is
vivid and blunt straight to the point showing how there was a
misunderstanding of Jesus as a man. For example in both
gospels, Jesus cries out to God right before his death, but in
Matthew 27:50, Matthew writes that Jesus cries out again. In the
conclusion of Mark you are left off with both Marys witnessing
the Angel, leaving a since of peace in our minds. In
conclusion of Mathew we have the actual reincarnation of Jesus
Aramis
CRM-discussion3replies.docx
0
