Leadership Personal Issues and the Rule Law

Points: 200

Assignment 3: Leadership Personal Issues and the Rules of Law

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Examine the change in requirements that police hiring agencies have had for potential candidates over the last 50 years and discuss the effects on law enforcement organizations. Support or critique the current requirements.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely examined the requirements that police hiring agencies have had for potential candidates. Did not submit or incompletely supported or critiqued the requirements.

Insufficiently examined the requirements that police hiring agencies have had for potential candidates. Insufficiently supported or critiqued the requirements.

Partially examined the requirements that police hiring agencies have had for potential candidates. Partially supported or critiqued the requirements.

Satisfactorily examined the requirements that police hiring agencies have had for potential candidates. Satisfactorily supported or critiqued the requirements.

Thoroughly examined the requirements that police hiring agencies have had for potential candidates. Thoroughly supported or critiqued the requirements.

2. Examine two areas in which federal courts have placed limits on officers' constitutional rights due to the nature of their work and explain the reasoning. Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely examined two areas in which federal courts have placed limits on officers' constitutional rights due to the nature of their work. Did not submit or incompletely explained the reasoning.

Insufficiently examined two areas in which federal courts have placed limits on officers' constitutional rights due to the nature of their work. Insufficiently examined the reasoning.

Partially examined two areas in which federal courts have placed limits on officers' constitutional rights due to the nature of their work. Partially examined the reasoning.

Satisfactorily examined two areas in which federal courts have placed limits on officers' constitutional rights due to the nature of their work. Satisfactorily explained the reasoning.

Thoroughly examined two areas in which federal courts have placed limits on officers' constitutional rights due to the nature of their work. Thoroughly explained the reasoning

3. Identify three constraints placed on law enforcement and examine how these constraints affect how law enforcement conducts their operations.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely identified three constraints placed on law enforcement and examined how these constraints affect how law enforcement conducts their operations.

Insufficiently identified three constraints placed on law enforcement and examined how these constraints affect how law enforcement conducts their operations.

Partially identified three constraints placed on law enforcement and examined how these constraints affect how law enforcement conducts their operations.

Satisfactorily identified three constraints placed on law enforcement and examined how these constraints affect how law enforcement conducts their operations.

Thoroughly identified three constraints placed on law enforcement and examined how these constraints affect how law enforcement conducts their operations.

4. Examine two current events in which police supervisors were held criminally liable for their officers' misconduct and explain the reasons why.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely examined two current events in which police supervisors were held criminally liable for their officers' misconduct. Did not submit or incompletely explained the reasons why.

Insufficiently examined two current events in which police supervisors were held criminally liable for their officers' misconduct. Insufficiently explained the reasons why.

Partially examined two current events in which police supervisors were held criminally liable for their officers' misconduct. Partially explained the reasons why.

Satisfactorily examined two current events in which police supervisors were held criminally liable for their officers' misconduct. Satisfactorily explained the reasons why.

Thoroughly examined two current events in which police supervisors were held criminally liable for their officers' misconduct. Thoroughly explained the reasons why.

5. Cite 4 references.

Weight: 5%

No references provided.

Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 8 errors present.

7-8 errors present.

5-6 errors present.

3-4 errors present.

0-2 errors present.