Criminal Procedure

Unit Assignment Rubric

There will be

a case analysis

assignment in

each unit

.

These are worth 25 points each and assess

the knowledge you gained during that particular and preceding Units.

The rubric is to be used as a guide; for you and your instructor. Remember, all submissions

should have an APA formatted title and reference page and all quotations/citations should be

properly formatted.

Criteria

0

-

1

Points

2

-

3

Point

4

-

5

Points

T

otal

Professional

communication

Unprofessional

communication

;

many errors; no APA

Minor gr

ammar,

spelling

, and APA

errors

Postings are

professional and in

standard written

English

with APA

Complete

addressing of

questions

Questions not fully

addressed

Minimal response

to questions; minor

aspects missing

All questions

(and all

parts of questions) are

fully addressed

Evidence of

critical thinking

or extending

information

Critical thinking or

extending information

not evident

Obvious responses

to questio

ns; little

thought evident

Posts demonstrate

critical thinking

with

evidence base from

research or experience

Course

connections

.

No connections

provided

Minimal

connections

provided

to

readings/activities

C

lear connections to

readings/activities

Analysis of

cases presented.

Surface analysis, little

to no demonstration

of understanding of

new and prior

knowledge.

Some analysis with

minimal

demonstration of

understanding of

new and prior

knowledge

Detailed analysis with

strong demonstration of

understanding of new

and prior knowledge.

TOTAL

/2

5

Unit Assignment Rubric

There will be a case analysis assignment in each unit. These are worth 25 points each and assess

the knowledge you gained during that particular and preceding Units.

The rubric is to be used as a guide; for you and your instructor. Remember, all submissions

should have an APA formatted title and reference page and all quotations/citations should be

properly formatted.

Criteria 0 - 1 Points 2 - 3 Point 4 - 5 Points Total

Professional

communication

Unprofessional

communication;

many errors; no APA

Minor grammar,

spelling, and APA

errors

Postings are

professional and in

standard written

English with APA

Complete

addressing of

questions

Questions not fully

addressed

Minimal response

to questions; minor

aspects missing

All questions (and all

parts of questions) are

fully addressed

Evidence of

critical thinking

or extending

information

Critical thinking or

extending information

not evident

Obvious responses

to questions; little

thought evident

Posts demonstrate

critical thinking with

evidence base from

research or experience

Course

connections.

No connections

provided

Minimal

connections

provided to

readings/activities

Clear connections to

readings/activities

Analysis of

cases presented.

Surface analysis, little

to no demonstration

of understanding of

new and prior

knowledge.

Some analysis with

minimal

demonstration of

understanding of

new and prior

knowledge

Detailed analysis with

strong demonstration of

understanding of new

and prior knowledge.

TOTAL /25