Textbooks rev
CRITICAL BOOK REVIEW RUBRIC
Name: ___________________________________ Date: __________________ Paper: _______________________________________
ORGANIZATION CRITICAL ANALYSIS ELEMENTS GRAMMAR/MECHANICS 25 pts per
section
Excellent
- Clear thesis statement that outlines a critical
position on one or more aspects of the book;
body explains criteria for critical review;
specific points are supported with clear and
strong details/examples; strong summation of
analyst’s critical impression
- Appropriate paragraphing
- Clear and appropriate transitions
- Appropriate length to cover topic
- Clearly and coherently focused (including a good sense of
audience)
- Thoughts clearly organized
- Logical and clear progression
- Assertions clearly supported/illustrated
- Depth of critical analysis and thought clearly evident
- Correct sentence structure
- Correct spelling
- Correct punctuation
- Correct capitalization
- Correct word choices
- Correct use of quotations (APA)
20 pts per
section
High
- Generally clear thesis statement that outlines
a critical position on one or more aspects of
the book; body generally explains criteria for
critical review; specific points are generally
supported with details/examples; appropriate
conclusion
- Generally appropriate paragraphing
- Generally clear and appropriate transitions
- Appropriate length to cover topic
- Clearly and cohesively focused with sufficient sense of
audience
- Thoughts generally organized
- Assertions generally supported/illustrated
- Generally shows critical analysis and thought
- Generally free of errors in sentence structure
spelling
punctuation
capitalization
- Generally correct word choices
- Generally correct use of quotations (APA)
18 pts per
section
Adequate
- Adequate thesis statement that outlines a
critical position on one or more aspects of the
book; body adequately explains criteria for
critical review; specific points are somewhat
supported with details/examples; adequate
conclusion
- Adequate paragraphing
- Adequate transitions
- Adequate length to cover topic
- Adequately focused (including some sense of audience)
- Thoughts adequately organized and presented
- Critical analysis and thought adequately
supported/illustrated
- Relatively few errors in sentence structure
spelling
punctuation
capitalization
word choice
- Relatively few errors in use of quotations
(APA)
15 pts per
section
Poor
- Weak beginning, development and support
of critical position, and conclusion
- Weak paragraphing
- Weak transitions
- Not adequate in length to cover topic
- Weakly focused (little sense of audience)
- thoughts not clearly organized
- Unclear progression
- Assertions weakly supported and/or illustrated
- Significant errors in sentence structure
spelling/punctuation
capitalization
word choice
- Significant errors in use of quotations (APA)
10 pts per
section
Unacceptable
- Serious and persistent errors in presentation
and support of position, organizational
structure, paragraphing, and transitions
- Does not cover the topic
- Not focused (no sense of audience)
- Unorganized
- Serious and persistent errors in sentence
structure/ spelling/punctuation/
capitalization/word choice
- Few/inappropriate use of quotations (APA)
Organization ______ Critical Analysis ______ Grammar/Mechanics _____ TOTAL: ___________/75 possible
Comments: