Critical article review

profileLongstockinnnn
CriticalReviewGradingRubric.docx

Critical Review Grading Rubric

KINE 3353: Health and the Human Condition in the Global Community

Fall 2020

Criteria

Ratings

Overview of the chapter

2 pts

Excellent

Reflects a full understanding of all key concepts and discusses main arguments. Takes about 1/3 of the page. Ends with a strong thesis that acknowledges both strengths and limitations.

1 pts

Satisfactory

Reflects a moderate understanding of all key concepts and arguments. Takes about 1/3 of the page. Thesis does not acknowledge both strengths and limitations.

0 pts

Needs Improvement

Overview is either too long or too short and does not accurately summarize the text. Does not end with a thesis statement or does not acknowledge either strengths or weaknesses.

Evaluation of Strengths & Weaknesses

2 pts

Excellent

Critically evaluates the text’s arguments and assumptions, discussing its strengths and weaknesses using appropriate evidence and examples. Synthesizes information and does not merely list. About 1/3rd of a page.

1 pts

Satisfactory

Adequately evaluates the arguments made. Discusses strengths and weaknesses but does not synthesize the information (instead listing) and provides adequate examples. About 1/3rd of a page.

0 pts

Needs Improvement

Does not evaluate either the strengths or weaknesses of the text. Too long or too short.

Conclusion: General Impressions or Recommendations

2 pts

Excellent

Discusses the text’s contribution to public health and any recommendations for improvement. Proficiently supports recommendations made and closing arguments.

1 pts

Satisfactory

Concludes with only either public health contributions or recommendations. Adequately supports recommendations for improvement and closing arguments.

0 pts

Needs Improvement

Does not discuss the text’s contribution to public health nor makes any recommendations for improvement.

Two Key Questions

2 pts

Excellent

At least two thoughtful questions are posed which provoke further thought AND at least one relevant external source is cited.

1 pts

Satisfactory

Only one thoughtful question is posed which provokes further thought, no external sources are cited, or one external source is cited with no questions posed.

0 pts

Needs Improvement

No questions are posed nor are any external sources cited.

Writing, Grammar & APA Format

2 pts

Excellent

Written in APA style using Zotero, in 11-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, double-spaced, and paginated with no errors. No spelling or grammar mistakes. 1 page or more.

1 pts

Satisfactory

Written in APA style using Zotero, in 11-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, double-spaced, and paginated with a few errors. A few spelling or grammar mistakes. 1 page or more.

0 pts

Needs Improvement

Not written in APA style, in 11-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, double-spaced, and paginated or with many errors. Does not use Zotero. Many spelling or grammar mistakes. Less than 1 page. An assignment with 30% or more in Unicheck will automatically receive a grade of zero.