Critical Appraisal Checklist and Worksheet
CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST: QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
How do you rate this paper? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
|
OBJECTIVES, HYPOTHESIS, STUDY PURPOSE |
YES |
NO |
|
Are the objectives (or aims) of the study clearly stated? Is the study question clearly stated? Is the hypothesis clearly stated? Is the study purpose an important clinical issue? |
|
|
|
LITERATURE REVIEW |
|
|
|
Did the researchers base their work on a thorough literature review? |
|
|
|
DESIGN, SAMPLE |
|
|
|
Is the study design suitable for the objectives? Are inclusion/exclusion criteria described? Was this the right sample to answer the objectives? Was a power analysis conducted to determine sample size? If subjects left the study, were reasons provided? Has ethical approval been obtained? |
|
|
|
MEASUREMENT |
|
|
|
Is the method of data collection consistent consistent with the study design? Is reference made to assumptions in the data? Is it clear what variables were measured? Is it clear how variables were measured? Is it clear how instruments were scored? Are instruments valid? Are instruments reliable? Are the measurements reproducible? |
|
|
|
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, PRESENTATION OF RESULTS |
|
|
|
Are data adequately described? Are statistical analysis methods appropriate to the data? Are results logically presented in table, charts/graphs? Are all statistics correctly interpreted? Do results fit with previous research on the topic? |
|
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|
|
|
Are the results discussed in relation to existing knowledge on the subject and study objectives? Is the discussion biased? |
|
|
|
INTERPRETATION |
|
|
|
Is the study question answered? Are the authors’ conclusions justified by the data? Does this paper help you answer your clinical problem? |
|
|
How do you rate this paper now? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
References
Coughian, M., Cronin, P. & Ryan, F. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research part 1:
Quantitative research. British Journal of Nursing, 16(II), 658-663.
Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). A guide to critical appraisal of evidence. Nursing 2019 Critical Care, 14(3), 24-30.
9.2019 MSN5300 KmR