|
Analysis &
ARgument
|
|
» explores artifact thoroughly, with attention to specific detail, showing how key elements work together to communicate meaning;
» articulates how meaning is being communicated, by illuminating significant patterns of frequency and contrast, anomaly, and/or moments of intensity;
» demonstrates how a text communicates meaning by making the implicit claims explicit;
» makes claims that are nuanced, sophisticated, supported with evidence, and connected through clear, compelling reasoning;
» arranges claims so that a central claim or thesis is clear, and that other claims work to make a central argument
» situates the artifact and its analysis into a larger cultural conversation effectively and articulately, and shows why attention is to them is warranted.
|
Exceptional
Reasonable
Minimal
Insufficient
|
|
|
Research
integration
|
|
» includes sources that are timely, credible, and relevant to the issues raised by the artifact and its analysis;
» extends research and deepens analysis, with sources supporting, complicating, challenging and/or contextualizing claims;
» introduces effectively others’ voices through summary, proper quotation, and appropriate signal phrases;
» research is situated as part of a larger cultural conversation, which the essay is entering and contributing to.
|
Exceptional
Reasonable
Minimal
Insufficient
|
|
|
organization, style & Format
|
|
» paragraphs cohere and are organized effectively;
» word choice is precise, dynamic, and varied, exhibiting a tone appropriate to academic genres;
» contains very few grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors;
» is formatted correctly according to MLA standards.
» meets the 6–7 page length requirement
|
Exceptional
Reasonable
Minimal
Insufficient
|
|