Research summary.

profileashleyymichellee
CriteriaRatingsPts.docx

CriteriaRatingsPts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCorrectly formatted APA reference

threshold: 7.5 pts

10 pts

Exceeds Expectations -The citation is in APA format with no errors

7.5 pts

Satisfactory- The citation has 1 – 2 errors in formatting

5 pts

Needs Improvement- The citation has 3 or more errors

0 pts

Unacceptable-Citation is missing or not in APA.

10 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of: Research problem; Description of research process; Results of study

CSLO 5 

threshold: 30.0 pts

40 pts

Exceeds Expectations -• Content is in-depth and well-organized • All 3 criteria are present and substantive

30 pts

Satisfactory- • Content is acceptable and adequately organized • All 3 criteria are present

15 pts

Needs Improvement- • Content is lacking or minimally organized • Not all criteria meet minimum standards

0 pts

Unacceptable- Content is lacking and not organized

40 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of: How does the article relate to the group topic? How will the article help me complete the presentation?

CSLO 5 

threshold: 30.0 pts

40 pts

Exceeds Expectations -• Discussion demonstrates in-depth rationale of article’s relevance to topic and how it will contribute to the presentation • Both criteria are discussed with a high level of critical thinking

30 pts

Satisfactory- • Discussion demonstrates an acceptable rationale displaying article has some relevance to topic and how it will contribute to the presentation • Both criteria are discussed

15 pts

Needs Improvement- • Discussion demonstrates minimal expectations of article’s relevance to topic or how it will contribute to the presentation • Not all criteria meet minimum standards

0 pts

Unacceptable- • Article has no relevance to topic • Summary does not meet minimal expectations • Lack of detail on article’s relevance to group topic or how the article will be used to complete the presentation.

40 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA, Grammar, and Mechanics

Article is less than 5 years old (unless it is a seminal work) and from an appropriate, peer-reviewed source. There are no spelling or grammar errors. At least 250 words and no more than 350 words. Font used is Times New Roman 12 pt. 1-inch margins and double-spaced. 

threshold: 7.5 pts

10 pts

Exceeds Expectations- The summary and analysis meet and adequately addresses all the criteria with no exceptions or errors. There are no grammar or spelling errors. Peer-reviewed article less than 5 years old. Meets length requirement.

7.5 pts

Satisfactory- The summary meets and adequately address all the criteria with 1 – 2 exceptions or errors. Peer-reviewed article less than 5 years old. Meets length requirement.

5 pts

Needs Improvement- The summary meets and adequately address all the criteria with 3 – 4 exceptions or errors. Article is not peer-reviewed or is over 5 years old. Length requirement is not met.

0 pts

Unacceptable- The summary does not adequately address the criteria or has 5 or more errors. Length requirement is not met; Article not peer-reviewed and/or is over 5 years old.

10 pts

Total Points: 100