Research summary.
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCorrectly formatted APA reference
threshold: 7.5 pts
|
10 pts Exceeds Expectations -The citation is in APA format with no errors |
7.5 pts Satisfactory- The citation has 1 – 2 errors in formatting |
5 pts Needs Improvement- The citation has 3 or more errors |
0 pts Unacceptable-Citation is missing or not in APA. |
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary of: Research problem; Description of research process; Results of study
CSLO 5
threshold: 30.0 pts
|
40 pts Exceeds Expectations -• Content is in-depth and well-organized • All 3 criteria are present and substantive |
30 pts Satisfactory- • Content is acceptable and adequately organized • All 3 criteria are present |
15 pts Needs Improvement- • Content is lacking or minimally organized • Not all criteria meet minimum standards |
0 pts Unacceptable- Content is lacking and not organized |
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of: How does the article relate to the group topic? How will the article help me complete the presentation?
CSLO 5
threshold: 30.0 pts
|
40 pts Exceeds Expectations -• Discussion demonstrates in-depth rationale of article’s relevance to topic and how it will contribute to the presentation • Both criteria are discussed with a high level of critical thinking |
30 pts Satisfactory- • Discussion demonstrates an acceptable rationale displaying article has some relevance to topic and how it will contribute to the presentation • Both criteria are discussed |
15 pts Needs Improvement- • Discussion demonstrates minimal expectations of article’s relevance to topic or how it will contribute to the presentation • Not all criteria meet minimum standards |
0 pts Unacceptable- • Article has no relevance to topic • Summary does not meet minimal expectations • Lack of detail on article’s relevance to group topic or how the article will be used to complete the presentation. |
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA, Grammar, and Mechanics
Article is less than 5 years old (unless it is a seminal work) and from an appropriate, peer-reviewed source. There are no spelling or grammar errors. At least 250 words and no more than 350 words. Font used is Times New Roman 12 pt. 1-inch margins and double-spaced.
threshold: 7.5 pts
|
10 pts Exceeds Expectations- The summary and analysis meet and adequately addresses all the criteria with no exceptions or errors. There are no grammar or spelling errors. Peer-reviewed article less than 5 years old. Meets length requirement. |
7.5 pts Satisfactory- The summary meets and adequately address all the criteria with 1 – 2 exceptions or errors. Peer-reviewed article less than 5 years old. Meets length requirement. |
5 pts Needs Improvement- The summary meets and adequately address all the criteria with 3 – 4 exceptions or errors. Article is not peer-reviewed or is over 5 years old. Length requirement is not met. |
0 pts Unacceptable- The summary does not adequately address the criteria or has 5 or more errors. Length requirement is not met; Article not peer-reviewed and/or is over 5 years old. |
10 pts
Total Points: 100