Google search feedback response

profilevk4queen
criteriamissed.docx

ANTH DISCUSSION 3

1. The following is the assignment criteria that was missed:

Note: Criteria in Black were correct, in Blue were partially incorrect, in Red were completely incorrect:

· Introduces/uses the concept of Filter Bubble

· Analysis of results using course concepts (Filter Bubble, Function Creep, Data Exhaust)

· Clear introduction and rationale of search criteria

· Shows understanding of/implications of a Filter Bubble

· Reasoning behind the selection of specific participants

· Personal observations on results

· Expectations/Reasoning around search criteria

· Conclusion supported by analysis and discussion

· Complete discussion of search results

· Well written with information presented logically and easy to follow

· Presents their participants’ demographic data

· Follows general expectation around layout/length

· Discusses the impact of their demographic data on their search results

· Follows Executive Summary parameters

· Table contains demographic data

· Thoughts on other things that might have influenced their search results (bonus)

· Table included within the document

· Big picture context on findings (bonus)

· Table referenced and used in discussion/analysis/conclusion

· Uses external resources for support (bonus)

 

- (C+ and below)  Does not meet expectations; insufficient for assignment – you need to work harder to keep your job

· Does not link to course concepts

· Explanation of course ideas are weak and/or inaccurate

· Merely repeats descriptive information without engaging in analysis.

· Presents little or no supporting evidence; discuss issue only in terms of personal opinion.

· Writing is problematic (very difficult to understand, many usage and typographical errors)

· Does not follow most, or all, of the Executive Summary Expectations