Google search feedback response
ANTH DISCUSSION 3
1. The following is the assignment criteria that was missed:
Note: Criteria in Black were correct, in Blue were partially incorrect, in Red were completely incorrect:
|
· Introduces/uses the concept of Filter Bubble |
· Analysis of results using course concepts (Filter Bubble, Function Creep, Data Exhaust) |
|
· Clear introduction and rationale of search criteria |
· Shows understanding of/implications of a Filter Bubble |
|
· Reasoning behind the selection of specific participants |
· Personal observations on results |
|
· Expectations/Reasoning around search criteria |
· Conclusion supported by analysis and discussion |
|
· Complete discussion of search results |
· Well written with information presented logically and easy to follow |
|
· Presents their participants’ demographic data |
· Follows general expectation around layout/length |
|
· Discusses the impact of their demographic data on their search results |
· Follows Executive Summary parameters |
|
· Table contains demographic data |
· Thoughts on other things that might have influenced their search results (bonus) |
|
· Table included within the document |
· Big picture context on findings (bonus) |
|
· Table referenced and used in discussion/analysis/conclusion |
· Uses external resources for support (bonus) |
- (C+ and below) Does not meet expectations; insufficient for assignment – you need to work harder to keep your job
· Does not link to course concepts
· Explanation of course ideas are weak and/or inaccurate
· Merely repeats descriptive information without engaging in analysis.
· Presents little or no supporting evidence; discuss issue only in terms of personal opinion.
· Writing is problematic (very difficult to understand, many usage and typographical errors)
· Does not follow most, or all, of the Executive Summary Expectations