Journal 1
1
CREDIBILITY IN NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION
THREE DIMENSIONS OF CREDIBILITY
Credibility is an essential for successful persuasive communication
The speaker’s credibility is evaluated by the message receiver
Competence
Trustworthiness competence and trustworthiness are the most important two dimensions for
credibility
Dynamism a concept generated from impression formation research, measuring how
“potent” the communicator’s behavior is
EXERCISE: PERSUASION
Find a topic/cause/issue that you believe in
Ex.: vegetarian diet
pro life vs. pro choice
pro vs. against death penalty
attendance requirement in undergrad?
2
COMPETENCE
Most important dimension
to be recognized as an expert in the subject discussed and, as a result, gaining confidence
has traditionally been perceived as an element that’s gained through verbal communication (i.e., information); but now, NV is recognized as an important element
“tension-leakage” cues would be judged less competent: nonfluencey, shifty eyes, lip moistening.
TRUSTWORTHINESS trustworthiness is a measure of our character as seen by those persons with whom we interact
based on assessment of an individual’s personal qualities, intentions, and attitude
generally evaluated through nonverbal
DYNAMISM defines people’s credibility or image in terms of the level of confidence they are perceived to have.
trigger a reciprocal feeling of confidence in those with whom we communicate.
“shy, introverted, soft-spoken individual is generally perceived as less credible than the assertive extroverted and forceful individual.”
3
INFLUENCING ATTITUDES & BEHAVIORS
Direct-Effects/Social Meanings Model of Immediacy increase in nonverbal immediacy substantially enhances a persuader's change of gaining compliance Gaze Touch Touch-& Gaze have additive effects on compliance
When soliciting for charity, requesting signatures for a petition, asking for a favor, or seeking assistance from a stranger, the combination of touch and gaze considerably increases one’s chance of achieving compliances
THEORIES ABOUT INCREASING CREDIBILITY
1. Direct-Effects/Social Meaning Models
2. Communication Accommodation Model
3. Expectancy Violations Theory
EXPLAINING DIRECT-EFFECTS/SOCIAL MEANING MODELS
Power touch, fast speaking, official uniforms, direct gaze dominant nonverbal behaviors (e.g., harsh facial expressions, command tone of voice) give an added persuasive boost to immediacy behaviors smiling is highly persuasive (but a submissive behavior)
Attention is prerequisite to message processing and the eventual compliance immediacy behaviors are “approach” behaviors that increases sensory stimulation
4
EXPLAINING DIRECT-EFFECTS/SOCIAL MEANING MODELS
Warmth positive interaction emotion arousal (“feel good”) and cognitive processing
Liking immediacy principle: people are drawn to persons they like, evaluate highly and prefer; and they avoid or move away from things they dislike, evaluate negatively or don’t prefer
COMMUNICATION-ACCOMMODATION THEORY
listeners perceive speech similar to their own as more attractive, pleasant, and intelligible
speakers typically adjust or accommodate their speech to the style or rate of the interactant, event though most speakers are unaware of this accommodating
people are more likely to be influenced by others who speak at the same rate and share similar voice tones as their own (i.e., matching of vocal cues)
EXPECTANCY VIOLATIONS THEORY
rewarding communicators are more persuasive when they violate expectancies BUT unrewarding communicators are more persuasive when their behavior is consistent with expectancies attractive individuals are perceived to be more credible, knowledgeable, and competent (e.g., physical and vocal attractiveness)
distraction models: irrelevant distractions may reduce persuasion high status/attractiveness as distraction? the cognitive process
5
BEHAVIORS TO ESTABLISH CREDIBILITY
Eye Behavior failure to sustain eye contact is the most damaging thing for
demonstrating confidence we are simply not believable unless we exhibit certain types of eye
behavior
Gestures and Postures
Voice strongly affects other’s perception of the speaker’s personality traits
and personal qualities dialect vs. regional accent anxiety indicators: stuttering, tongue slips, sentence change, incompletions, pauses filled with
ah, phrases like “you know”