Argumentative

Student Id

Professor Name

Coarse No

Date

Word Count

1500

Introduction

Even if there are no major distinctions between creativity, innovation, and design in terms of individual and collaborative responsibilities, there are issues in the management of such variances. The concepts of design, invention and managerial ideas create the intellectual capital of a business which gives the creator, inventor and designer special benefits. Several organizations, with their business, financial certifications, legal and copyright awards, and patents, honor, reward and protect the successful accomplishments of such notions. (Maher, 2018)

In addition, Creativity, innovation and design are the most essential factors promoting employee growth and R&D and human resources management. Therefore, a particular ideas and inventions and designs may generate a dispute between the different employees and organizational groups. The organization needs to identify the legality of ownership to recognize in various litigating circumstances the right of individual/group contribution to company products (Maher, 2018)

Although the job of individual workers is a matter of effective creativity, innovation, and thought-out labor from a personal standpoint, there is a partial agreement. Thence, the scale of the argument is based on Theresa Amabile's componential creative theory, the theory of person-fitness, the interchange of leading members, and the management theory which provides instances of real-world affairs from Google LLC and Tesla Inc. The essay's structure is divided into 2 paragraphs in each portion into different parts. The first paragraph offers related definitions and literary backgrounds of creativity, innovation, and design thinking, whilst the second paragraph utilizes particular theories to examine individual and corporate responsibilities (Menon, 2018)

Creativity

Creativity is a reference for meaningful programs and procedures. To contribute to corporate development, the individual activity is the activity of an individual employee. For instance, an individual worker can develop successful personal creativity if he or she establishes personal rules for achieving business achievement. These are not the conditions, but rather the establishment in relation to his strengths and weaknesses of a specific employee. The creativity of the organization, on the other hand, is concerned with business resources, strategies and tools utilized for working together by the group members. (Gibson, 2019)

The effective organizational creativity of Google LLC is acquired, for example, by allowing not only to enhance a wonderful job, but to live in an extraordinary work atmosphere in a rich and comfortable way. (Gibson, 2019)

The individual employee gains high levels of work motivation, appropriate domain skills, and creativity-related processes according to the notion of the creative component. Consequently, effective creative activities depend increasingly on the labour of individual employees. This hypothesis may be applied to Sony Corporation, California's American power and car firm. When considering a virtual reality project, the firm encourages individual workers to develop unique rules and borders for various social roles by looking at the world as a major game. (Taggar, 2019)

Consequently, effective creative activities depend increasingly on the labor of individual employees. This theoretical approach may apply to Tesla Inc., a U.S. energy and automobile company located in California. In light of a project of virtual reality, the company encourages individual workers to build personal and social norms by considering the globe a gigantic game. Thus, each individual employee can utilize his/her genius to modify standards and boundaries as long as they conform to the unique picture of the individual of a perfect world. (Janssen, 2019)

However, the preference for personal creativity does not match the results of previous study that shows that the meaning of creativity depends on the company's rules. So, but instead eighty-four percent of businesses that emphasize innovation employ a reward strategy for individuals, sixty percent of organizations that highlight organizational creativity use a rewards policy based on teams. Therefore, a business must employ creative people to improve performance while stressing management methods to improve organizational creativity. (Janssen, 2019)

Innovation

Innovation is a complicated process that designs a new idea to solve numerous economic or social challenges. Innovation also refers to produces, promotes and realizes a person or organization's new ideas to achieve good personal or collective achievements. While the process of innovation is competitive, controversial, and unexpected, in company management there are generally numerous hazards. Innovation depends, on the one hand, on the following factors: a person's inherent need to explore and control the world in a creative and threatening manner and the urge to obtain A psychological safety sensation. (Carroll, 2020)

On the other hand, corporate innovation is an occurrence whereby produced socially to conceptualize new ideas through encounters and dialogues. While the psychological and environmental consequences of the individual invention primarily depend on individuals and groups, successful innovations are dependent. Based on the notion of fitness for the person to the environment, an individual can adjust his/her environment by altering working goals, techniques, approaches, design, and interpersonal communication among other alternatives, replacing his/her expectations, skills, and behaviors. (Carroll, 2020)

This paper described Tesla, based on four perspectives of innovation successful innovation efforts. The company's co-founder, managing director and product architect, Elon Reeve Musk, has become a remarkable innovator questioning orthodoxy, embracing trends, utilizing resources, and recognizing requirements. In reality, in 2003, Musk utilized his unique method to develop a new notion of a technological firm that manufactures electric automobiles. In addition, the exchange theory of the leading Member also states that innovativeness determines the quality the relationship between supervisors and subordinates (Gibson, 2019)

This notion describes Google LLC in Google data mining's successful business innovation. The Google data mining technology not only records employee engagement on a daily basis but also ensures that managers welcome all new workers on the first day of the business. This enhances corporate innovations by increasing the quality of the interaction between management and employee. (Carroll, 2020)

Thinking design

Therefore, concepts, methods and progress are developed in the innovation process to provide insights and measurements. (Bruce, 2019) From an educational point of view design thinking has a wicked nature. In particular, students can become truly designers, but they do not entirely comprehend theories if the teacher teaches design thinking concepts. Design is from a management perspective simply the best way of creativity and innovation. The way an individual design designer works on the resolution of problems, on the one hand, is a cognitive method. (Bruce, 2019)

On the other side, corporate thinking is an organizational resource for innovation-intensive firms. In Google's example, design thinking depends on a person's aesthetic beliefs. David Radcliffe is therefore receiving a complaint against the purple room, Vice-Chair of Google's Immobilize & Workplace Services. Those unfavorable responses he doesn't understand, but by demolishing linseeds in the firm he decides to minimize the effects of paint colors. (Bruce, 2019)

In addition, the Vice President will hear just one complaint concerning Violet space in the organization before removal of any additional violet regions. The aesthetic assessment by each employee is in this respect stronger than that of the Vice-President and others (Bruce, 2019)

Management theory argues that design thinking is more dependent on group cooperation since it is a process of working with less discreet but more cognitive characteristics. This idea is congruent with cognitive design concerns which indicate the connective environment that produces the process of collaborative design at the same time. (Bruce, 2019)

Some synergies are the flow of the complete team instead of any single person even in the event of dissent among the team members. For example, Tesla Inc. The usage of aluminium in Tesla's Model S creates excellent personal and corporate design thinking. Every manufacturer reacts differently to innovation, whereas Musk and the Tesla engineers both know that aluminium is stronger than steel. Musk emphasizes expertise in using resources to think about individual design. The Aluminum Body was used by Tesla engineers for organizational design in the designs of Tesla's automotive from the Musk Space X Falcon rocket. Thus, good design thinking is a problem for people and corporate groups alike. (Bruce, 2019)

Conclusion

Creativity, innovation, and design thinking are hard concepts that operate from a management perspective as an intellectual capital of a firm. Yet every concept has a particular value that helps both individuals and businesses flourish. The success of these principles might depend upon the individual employees in a scenario concerning the commercial conditions of Google LLC and Tesla, while connected in a different setting to the organization. (Altink, 2019)

The intellectual characteristics of both individual individuals and corporate groupings are creativity, invention, and thinking in particular business settings. Instead of agreement or rejection, the choice of individual employees is just partial. Moreover, multiple theories are used in every idea. The componential creativity hypothesis underlines the significance of individual labor in creativity. Although the notion of person-fitness refers to individual innovations' environmental sensitivity, the leading exchange theory indicates that favorably mutual business relationships improve corporate innovation. (Altink, 2019)

Instead of stylistically speaking, the management theory addresses the cognitive quality. Through these principles, creativity, innovation and design functions from an educational and managerial perspective may be built. Despite the contradiction between individual and company benefits, the company assessment ideas should guarantee that the interaction between managers, employees, and groups is civilized in the long run. (Altink, 2019)

References

a) Altink (2019). ‘Innovation at work: individual, group, organizational, and socio-historical perspectives, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology.

b) Bruce, S. (2019). 'Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace, Academy of Management Journal,. .

c) Carroll, K. (2020). 'Student teams in search of design thinking, Design Thinking Research,. .

d) Gibson (2019). How Tesla Became One of the World’s Great Innovators. .

e) Janssen, V. de V. (2019). The bright and dark sides of individual and group innovation: a special issue introduction.

f) Maher, M. (2018). “Collective intelligence and design thinking”, DTRS’10: Design Thinking Research Symposium.

g) Menon, B. (2018). Making innovation happen in organizations: Individual creativity mechanisms, organizational creativity mechanisms or both? Journal of Product Innovation Management.

h) Taggar (2019). ‘Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: a multilevel model.

i) Woodilla, J. (2019). “Design thinking: past, present, and possible futures”, Creativity and Innovation Management.

1