journal critical thinking
CRAAP Criteria for Evaluating Research Currency: Is the information properly current?
● When was the information published, posted, gathered, or created? ● Has the information been revised or updated? ● Does your topic require current information, or will older sources work? ● Are any web-links functional?
Relevance: Is the information specifically valuable to your needs?
● Does the information closely relate to your topic or answer your question? ● Who is the intended audience? ● Is the information presented at an appropriate level? ● Have you looked at a variety of sources before deciding on this one? ● Does it seem appropriate to cite this source?
Authority: Does the information come from proper expertise?
● Who is the author, publisher, source, or sponsor? ● What are the the author’s, authors’, or organization’s credentials? ● What affiliations does the source have? ● Is the author qualified regarding this topic? ● Is there sufficient contact information available from the research? ● What do any URLs indicate? (.edu, .gov, .org, .com)
Accuracy: Is the information reliable, truthful, correct?
● Where does it come from? ● Is the information supported by evidence? ● Has the information been reviewed or refereed? ● Can you verify any of the information in another source or from personal knowledge? ● Is the information presented in way that is free of fallacies, rhetoric, bias, emotion, etc.? ● Are there compositional errors in the writing?
Purpose: Why does the information exist in the first place?
● Is the purpose to inform, teach, sell, entertain, persuade, etc.? ● Do the authors or sponsors make their intentions clear? ● Is the information fact, opinion, propaganda, etc.? ● Does the point of view appear objective and impartial? ● Are there political, institutional, ideological, cultural, or personal biases?