Ethics Oral Presentation Topic

CPT105ResearchPaperRubric.xlsx

Home >Nursing homework help >Ethics Oral Presentation Topic

Sheet1

Ethics Research Paper Rubric
Student Name: ____________________________________________
Topic: ___________________________________________________
SCORE:
	Organization / Structure:
	A.	5 - Strong intro of topic’s key questions, terms.
		3 - Conveys topic and key questions.
		2 – Conveys topic, but not key questions.
		1 - Does not adequately convey topic.
	B.	5 - Evident, understandable, appropriate for paper. Excellent transitions from point to point. Paragraphs support solid topic sentences.
		4 - Generally clear and appropriate, though may wander occasionally. May have a few unclear transitions, or a few paragraphs without strong topic sentences.
		3 - Generally unclear, often wanders or jumps around. Few or weak transitions, many paragraphs without topic sentences.
		2 - Unclear, often because paper is weak or non-existent. Transitions confusing and unclear. Few topic sentences.
		1 - Shows minimal lack of effort or comprehension of the assignment.
	Content:
	A.	10 - Paper completely answers assignment question.
		7 - Paper somewhat answers assignment question; some information is missing.
		5 - Too much information distracts the focus of the paper.
		0 - Paper does not answer assignment question.
	B.	10 - Examples in Paper are ample support for thesis.
		5 - Examples in Paper are not enough support for thesis.
		0 - Examples in Paper do not support thesis at all.

	C.	10 - Examples are specific and concrete.
		5 - Examples are nonspecific and/or abstract.
		0 - Examples are vague or distracting.
	D.	5 – Resources in Paper are adequate, timely and relevant.
		0 - Resources in Paper are not adequate, timely and relevant.

	E.	10 - Interest level of Paper is superior.
		7 - Interest level of Paper is above average.
		5 - Interest level of Paper is average.
		0 - Interest level of Paper is below average.

	F.	5 - Introduction and conclusion are interesting and balanced.
		3 - Introduction or conclusion is dull, or one is stronger than the other.
		0 - Both introduction and conclusion are dull or are both weak.

	G.	5 - Paper has minimum 6 Works Cited.
		0 - Paper does NOT have minimum 6 Works Cited.
	Logic and argumentation:
	A.	5 – All ideas in the paper flow logically; the argument is identifiable, reasonable, and sound.
		4 – Argument is clear, usually flows logically and makes sense.
		3 – Logic may often fail, or argument may often be unclear.
		2 – Ideas do not flow at all, usually because there is no argument to support.
		0 – Shows obviously minimal lack of effort or comprehension of the assignment.

	Style and Mechanics:
	A.	5 - Clarity of sentences and paragraphs.
		3 - Has some clarity of sentences and paragraphs.
		0 - No clarity of sentences and paragraphs.

	B.	5 - Paper consistently uses proper punctuation and grammar.
		0 - Paper contains 4 or more errors in punctuation and grammar.

	C.	5 - Paper exhibits correct spelling.
		0 - Four or more words are misspelled.

	D.	5 - Paper is written in appropriate point of view.
		0 - Point of view is inappropriate for Paper.
	E.	5 – Organization and coherence of ideas.
		0 – No organization and coherence of ideas.
	F.	5 – Instructions for formatting were followed.
		0 – Instructions for formatting were not followed.
TOTAL: ______/ 100 Possible