| Course Code | Class Code |
| RES-811 | RES-811-O502 | Annotated Bibliography: Doctoral Identity | 150.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | Unsatisfactory (0.00%) | Less than Satisfactory (73.00%) | Satisfactory (82.00%) | Good (91.00%) | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Criteria | 100.0% |
| Annotated Bibliography | 70.0% | An annotated bibliography is either missing or not evident to the reader. Annotations lack any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | An annotated bibliography is present, but inaccurate or incomplete. Annotations are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | An annotated bibliography is presented, but the elements are addressed in a cursory manner. | An annotated bibliography is presented and includes all necessary elements. Annotations are clear and relatively descriptive. They are appropriate to the purpose. | An annotated bibliography is thoroughly presented with rich detail and includes all necessary elements. Annotations are clear and comprehensive. |
| Evaluative Critique | 20.0% | An evaluative critique of articles is either missing or not evident to the reader. Annotations lack any discernible overall critique. | An evaluative critique of articles is present, but inaccurate or incomplete. Annotations contain insufficiently developed and/or vague evaluation. | An evaluative critique of articles is presented, but is done so in a cursory manner. | An evaluative critique of articles is presented and critiques are clear and relatively evaluative. They are appropriate to the purpose. | An evaluative critique of articles is thoroughly presented with rich detail. Critiques are clear and comprehensive. |
| Mechanics of Writing | 5.0% | Mechanical errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. |
| APA Format | 5.0% | Required format is rarely followed correctly. No reference page is included. No in-text citations are used. | Required format elements are missing or incorrect. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Reference page is present. However, in-text citations are inconsistently used. | Required format is generally correct. However, errors are present (e.g. font, cover page, margins, and in-text citations). Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented though some errors are present. | Required format is used, but minor errors are present (e.g. headings and direct quotes). Reference page is present and includes all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. | The document is correctly formatted. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
knndrapeogleb
CopyofRubric_Print_Format.xlsx
