presentation and handout

YUC / COOP_FYP / PRESENT _EVAL

YANBU UNIVERSITY COLLEGE WOMEN’S CAMPUS

COOP TRAINING

MS Department PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM

Version 1.1 Page 1 of 2

STUDENT INFORMATION

STUDENT NAME STUDENT ID

COMPANY NAME DEPARTMENT

ADVISOR NAME PROGRAM (MIS,ACCT,HRM)

Item/Criteria 1 2 3 4 5

Introduction of topic Very poor introduction and explanation on company profile / background

Poor introduction and explanation on company profile / background.

Topic introduced. Satisfactory explanation on company profile / background.

Topic introduced clearly, and purpose of talk was made clear. Good explanation on company profile / background.

Topic introduced clearly and in an interesting way. Purpose of talk was made clear. Outline of points was given. Provide excellent explanation inclusive of the organization structure, nature of business and services/product.

Ability to brief the roles and responsibilities throughout COOP training

Information is irrelevant, inaccurate, minimal, confusing.

Information is inaccurate or inappropriate. Shows a lack of understanding of the tasks.

May attempt to be explained, and vague information is included. Shows a partial understanding of the tasks/ work process.

Described effectively however, some irrelevant tasks/activities are included. Shows a general understanding of the tasks/ work process.

Described effectively. Shows a complete understanding of the tasks/ work process.

Ability to share insights on the skills learned and the challenges/ achievements/ knowledge gained/ experiences

Very poor explanation.

Too short explanation. Lacks information about the experience and lessons learned.

Shortly explained. Provides an incomplete and rough description of the experience and lessons learned.

Well explained. Concisely provides satisfactory details about the experience and lessons learned.

Clearly explained and thoughtful inclusive of well expression. Includes sufficient details about the experiences and lessons learned by the student throughout the COOP training program.

Contributions / creative problem solving skills

- No / illogical ideas - Unfeasible solution - Vague analysis of the

problem - Inadequate

contribution/ project

- Some ideas but not original / new

- Does not have good solution strategy.

- Fairly clear analysis of some areas of the problem

- Adequate contribution/ project

- Some fairly good ideas - There is no creativity in the

solution. - Quite feasible - Fairly clear analysis of the

problem - Good contribution/ project

- Very good ideas / areas - Some level of creativity is

present in the methods of solution.

- Feasible ideas - Clear analysis of the problem - Very good contribution/

project

- Excellent ideas / new areas - Able to explain creativity in the

reflected solution. - Clearly feasible - Very clear analysis of the problem - Original / outstanding contribution/

project

Conclusion of topic None. An attempt was made to conclude the presentation.

The presentation was summed up ambiguously.

The presentation was summed up clearly.

The presentation was summed up clearly and effectively, with key points emphasized.

Question Handling Does not understand questions. No ability to handle questions.

Lacks ability to answer questions effectively.

Answer questions fairly well / quite competently / fairly concisely / clearly.

Answer questions quite well / competently / concisely / clearly.

Answer questions very well / very competently / concisely / clearly.

YUC / COOP_FYP / PRESENT _EVAL

YANBU UNIVERSITY COLLEGE WOMEN’S CAMPUS

COOP TRAINING

MS Department PRESENTATION EVALUATION FORM

Version 1.1 Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5

Design creativity / Presentation style

Did not use a proper presentation style to catch audience’s attention

No visual aids were used. Rarely used a proper presentation style to catch audience’s attention.

Visual aids were occasionally appropriate. Sometimes, used gestures, eye contact and tone of voice to maintain the audience’s attention.

Visual aids supported the presentation effectively. In general, gestures, eye contact and tone of voice got the audience’s attention.

Used appropriate outlines and incorporated visuals aids (e.g. photos, graphs/timelines, work samples) were carefully prepared and supported the presentation effectively.) Gestures, eye contact and tone of voice got the audience’s attention. Visual aids

Professionalism / Enthusiasm

Need motivation.

Not adequately prepared to present. Dress attire too casual. Shows absolutely no interest in topic presented.

Comes not fully prepared and dressed with some effectiveness. Shows some negativity toward topic presented.

Comes prepared and dressed appropriately look. Occasionally shows positive feelings about topic.

Comes prepared and dressed professionally. Constantly demonstrates a strong, positive feeling about topic during entire presentation.

Organization / Language / Delivery

- No organization - Inconsistent/

confusing ideas - Unclear objectives - A nervous wreck

- Lacks good organization - Some ideas are linked - Not very clear objectives - Not confident

- Fairly organized - Fairly clear objectives - Good language - Fairly confident delivery

- Well organized - Clear objectives - Very good language - Confident delivery

- Very well organized - Very clear objectives - Excellent language - Very confident delivery

Time management Very poor. Overused of time. Some reasonable delays. Good time management. Very good time management.

REMARKS:

Total marks: /50

EXAMINER NAME

DEPARTMENT

SIGNATURE DATE