Summarize your key points

Date:

Option 1: Constitutional Republic Vs. Dictatorship Reign

The value of identity through nationalism can only be truly expressed in the form of understanding what the forms of leadership mean and their characteristics specific to their identifiers. It means delving into what the leaders within that regime bring to the table when taking the structure of its systems. Taking an argumentative point of view that dictatorship is oppressive by nature, the discussion will focus on the philosophical nature of the two forms of regimes to understand the comparative aspects that make them two opposites that are systematically so different. The differences and the slight similarity, if possible, are ways in which the paper will use to bring out the sphere of authority that is oppressive and freedom-oriented between dictatorship and constitutional reign respectively. Therefore, the main points will evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of both of them in a way that informs what decisions are made within the reigns. Case studies will be used to bring out what it means to those being ruled and thus the value addition or reduction of the elements of the quality of life within that reign.

Outline

1. Introduction

· Description of reigns and authority and its potential effect on the quality of life within the subjects

2. Definitions

· Literature Review of existing documentation for and against the two types of the reign

· Defining constitutional republic and giving examples of the worst- and best-case scenarios within its reign

· Defining dictatorship reign and giving examples of the worst- and best-case scenarios within its reign

3. Case Analysis

· Describing existing real-life rulership of doctorship that seems to have impacted the quality of life from a positive light to a negative one during its reign and its impact several years later

· Describing existing real-life rulership under democracy that has worked and the constitutional aspect that has made it possible to thrive.

4. Summary and Further Discussion

· Summary of key point attained in the comparison of the tow

5. Conclusion

· Summary of the takeaway from the comparison in meeting the intention of the paper.

Reference List

Cheibub, J. A., Gandhi, J., & Vreeland, J. R. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public choice, 143(1), 67-101.

Moghaddam, F. M. (2013). The psychology of dictatorship. American Psychological Association.

Stroup, M. D. (2007). Economic freedom, democracy, and the quality of life. World Development, 35(1), 52-66.