Done

Deontology vs. utilitarianism

There is the presence of minimal relativeness regarding the comparison and contrast of deontology vs. utilitarianism. Their common ground is established on the fact that both deontology and utilitarianism portray concern and interest with subject to what is established as wrong and right regarding the actions conducted by human beings. The contrast established between deontology and utilitarianism is the fact that they portray a different representation regarding what is established as being bad and good with subject to human beings. The concept of deontology can best be described as a study regarding the duty or obligation and the aspect of consequential moral judgment or the specified actor with subject to determining the fact that he or she complied. The better understanding of deontology is better understood through making a comparison to what is regarded as opposing theories, for instance, utilitarianism. The utilitarianism theory states that as humans, we are mandated with the obligation of taking the course action that is subject to achieving the most favorable consequence or outcome.

The consequentialist debate theory generally tells us that we need to make consideration with subject to our actions and their final consequences regardless of the fact that the act being undertaken may not be established as being morally right. Various research articles try to establish the fact that the concept of the consequentialist debate theory and utilitarianism are established as being similar. Therefore, this establishes the fact that our actions are portrayed as a basis that is subject to our judgment. Thus, the consequentialist debate theory insists on the fact that the end result of the human actions, whether being right or wrong, is determined through the situation development at the end.

The distinction between Mill's and Bentham version with subject to utilitarianism

The distinctions portrayed between Mill's and Bentham versions with subject to utilitarianism are established to be significant. The subject of ethics with subject to Bentham establishes the fact that humans should undertake the performance of actions that result in them receiving the greatest pleasures without the aspect of being subject to a single qualitative distinction. On the other hand, the subject of ethics with subject to Mill's version is the fact that humans and animals are totally not related while also establishing the aspect of humanity as being extra valuable.

Mill had a belief that was based on the fact that the obligation of a human being was the achievement of the highest of the qualities presented that resulted in the greatest of pleasures. Thus, Bentham's version was established on act utilitarianism, while on the other hand, Mill's version was established on the utilitarianism rule of an individual. Therefore, the above considerations establish a very big contrast between the two. The aspect of utilitarianism can best be described as the individual judgment of a person on the basis of his or her actions while the aspect of the utilitarianism rule is on the basis of the final results of an action which consequently reward an individual with great pleasures and happiness.

Political and ethical implications of utilitarianism

The implications established by the concept of utilitarianism is based on the fact that there is a balance existence regarding what is established as being right over the wrong. Thus, this is established as being a moral principle that is applied to withholding the morality of actions regarding those impacted by significant disadvantages or advantages. Hence, the concept of utilitarianism has an ethical implication regarding the fact that if an action enhances the production of maximum good with regards to all people, then it is established not to be caring with the subject to whether the excellent end result achieved is as a result of lies, coercion or manipulation. The utilitarianism morality of actions is applied in our daily lives with subject to the decision-making aspect. The feelings of individuals are based on is based on their intentions regarding the avoidance of harm and implicating the good with subject to their decision making.

The political implication of utilitarianism entails the rights of the people with subject to the government and its authority. This has enhanced the provision of an alternative for theories, for instance, the natural law, social contract, and inherent rights. The government is subject to the determination of the best governing strategies that would result in the production of the best outcomes favoring all peoples. Thus, this establishes a vital role in human behavior and nature. This has established over the years that the human being is established as the best judge subject to their welfare. Thus, the belief of political actions has been established as a significant change in the right direction with subject to society. Basing on utilitarianism was able to establish the fact that mixed reactions and distinct conclusions are always available (Ethics.org, 2019). Utilitarianism enables us to understand people with selfish or malicious intentions can enhance the projection of negative results for the achievement of the political order, which translates to the fact that they can be led by the utilitarianism concept in being conservative or authoritarian.

Virtue and care ethics based on Deontology and utilitarianism aspects

The aspect of virtue ethics exhibits familiarity with normative ethics while it portrays a distinction between deontology and utilitarianism. For instance, based on the situation where a person requires aid, persons with a view based on utilitarianism would concentrate on the consequences that would have a crucial role in the provision of the most positive course. In contrast, on the other hand, persons with a view based on deontology base their course of actions on the subject of doing unto others what one would wish to be done for. On the contrary, persons with a view based on virtue ethics have the notion of the fact that helping a person in need translates to the performance of charitable activity (Ethics.org, 2019). Thus, virtue ethics significantly emphasizes the entire individual character rather than just concentrating on the duties and obligations of an individual. The ethics of care entails the application of context-bound and relationship-based approach with regards to morality and the aspect of decision making. The care of ethics portrays a distinction with deontology and utilitarianism aspects since an individual acts for those with who they have an intimate relationship. In essence, virtue ethics entails taking excellent actions, which include the application of virtues such as optimism, tact, and perceptiveness. The utilitarianism aspect, on the other hand, entails the concentration an individual employs regarding those particular actions that result in significant pleasures. On the other hand, the Deontology aspect is subject to the adhering to the established moral principles which are established on integrity. Through acting in accordance with all these three discussed moral philosophies were living in such a way that enhances the maximization of self-knowledge as established by Socrates Maxim based on the fact that our way of life is in accordance with doing whatever we like, which we obviously do in the right way without causing harm to others. This implies that humans are on the high road with subject to gaining wisdom regarding ourselves with subject to life.

The aspect of care ethics establishes the morally relevant psychological distinctions with regard to genders. In contrast, Deontology and utilitarianism aspects are established to be leaning towards subjective claims that have been determined to be morally relevant on various occasions. For instance, various ethical field aspects, for example, caring for both the environment and animals, are nowadays in public policy. Care ethics entails undertaking actions that enhance the caring of those in need. The deontology views this as a rule, while the utilitarianism aspect views this as the utilization in enhancing the maximization of human wellbeing. Political theory and a social movement have been established to branch from care ethics with the intention of establishing and understanding the public support, and the aspect of caregiving practices and varieties. The care ethics aspect our ethical concern basis should be with regards to our emotional responses concerning the actions. Thus, special relationships are established to bring out special social and moral responsibility. Therefore, this establishes the fact that we have to always act in concentration over the interest of other individuals who are exposed to suffering and wellbeing. Thus, as caring agents, we always ought to entail a care response to those subjected to suffering. One can't be described as a caring agent if he or she fails to care with regards to the interest of other individuals that they're aware are undergoing through suffering.

Existential ethics

The concept of Existential ethics entails a significant recognition of the fact that the onset of morality is based on the primary valuing of every single individual with regards to personal being and decisions with regards to going on with subject to wholeness existence. Thus, every single individual has a significant interest regarding the management of one’s valued life. Existential has been established as being among the most significant philosophies over the years. This concept concentrates on self-finding and determining the meaning of life through the application of Fra-Existential ethical will, personal responsibility, and choice (Sevenpillarsinstitute.org, 2018). The Existential ethics belief is the fact that throughout life, people are always seeking to establish what and who they are with subject to life while establishing decisions with subject to outlook, experiences, and beliefs.

Existential ethics concentrates on the element of human existence with regards to the view of the fact that there isn't an existence core's explanation or purpose. Existential ethics ascertains the fact that as there is no existence of God plus other established transcendent power, the fundamental approach of countering the available nothingness is through enhancing the embrace for existence (Sauer, 2017). Hence, Existential ethics makes an assumption of the fact that humans are entirely free and are obligated to taking personal responsibility. Existential ethics puts an emphasis on freedom, action, and decision. This concept also holds the fact that the fundamental avenue for rising above with subject to essentially humanity absurd condition is through the exercising of individual choice and freedom even though this particular view is entirely objected by the concept of determinism.

Existential ethics is based on a philosophy that makes an attempt to evade categorization even though it can be generalized still. Irrespective of the differences that exist between renowned existentialists, they came to an agreement that the onset of philosophy should be the subject, which is the human in this case. Authenticity has been established as being the central virtue with subject to Existential ethics that has an often interpretation of freedom even though it is well established with the sincerity aspect. This has more to do with the element of remaining true to one's self and owning the personal character. Therefore, the lack of authenticity is established as being bad faith (Sauer, 2017). Thus, an act of bad faith is established to diminish freedom. On the contrary, an act of authenticity is established to open up freedom (Profile, 2020). Ambiguity is also established as being central regarding the human condition. This establishes the suspension of a creature between God and us and establishing the fact that we're never totally in control or power over our lives. This establishes a constant ambiguity concerning all the elements we can't do. Anxiety has been established to have a distinction with fear regarding the fact that fear entails a direct object, while anxiety doesn't entail an object. This means that anxiety is just a general feeling that is looming whose occurrence is established as being part of the human condition. In bad faith, humans have mostly relinquished their responsibility and freedom. This can be attributed to the fact that the element of freedom and responsibility with subject to humans is characterized by anguish and Existential anxiety.

The role played by free will with subject to ethical decision making.

Free will is established to play a significant role with regard to decision making. The role of free will is determined as being the ensuring of the uniqueness of personal decisions within the necessity objective absence of true necessity. The aspect of free will forces the movement of people and responsibility without being subjected to influences from ethnic rules, laws, and traditions. The concept of free will dramatically emphasize the aspect of personal existence, choice, and freedom. Within the free will concept, there is always a perception of the fact that individuals actually do a definition of their meaning in life with an attempt in coming up with decisions that can best be described as being rational regardless of the irrational universe in existence.

Theories discussed

The theories discussed include the theory consequentialist debate, virtue and care ethical theories, and Existential, ethical theory. The argument consequentialist discussion is subject to the final outcome and or the precedent consequences with subject to the human actions that follow thereafter. The consequentialist debate theory is subject to our judgment regarding what is right or wrong and the form through which it was conducted. This was a major driving factor in me, establishing what is incorrect or correct, and making decisions regarding my career.

The aspect of virtue ethics exhibits familiarity with normative ethics. In contrast, the care ethics concept this establishes the fact that we have to always act in concentration over the interest of other individuals who are exposed to suffering and wellbeing, which I would use both aspects, is administering care subject to my nursing career (Profile, 2020). Existential ethics entails a significant recognition of the fact that the onset of morality is based on the primary valuing of every single individual with regards to personal being and decisions with regards to going on with subject to wholeness existence. I would apply this concept in my career, which also the fact that the fundamental avenue for rising above with subject to essentially humanity absurd condition is through the exercising of my choice and freedom with subject to my career.

Conclusion

The consequentialist debate theory generally tells us that we need to make consideration with subject to our actions and their final consequences regardless of the fact that the act being undertaken may not be established as being morally good. Thus, the consequentialist debate theory insists on the fact that the end result of the human actions, whether being right or wrong, is determined through the situation development at the end. Therefore, this establishes the fact that our actions are portrayed as a basis that is subject to our judgment. Virtue ethics significantly emphasizes the entire individual character rather than just concentrating on the duties and obligations of an individual. The ethics of care entails the application of context-bound and relationship-based approach with regards to morality and the aspect of decision making. Existential ethics makes an assumption of the fact that humans are entirely free and are obligated to taking personal responsibility. Existential ethics puts an emphasis on freedom, action, and decision.

Bentham, J. (2011). Deontology or, the science of morality. Retrieved from https://openlibrary.org/books/OL7046034M/Deontology_or_The_science_of_morality

Ethics.org. (2019, May 2). Ethics explainer: Existentialism - The ethics centre. Retrieved from https://ethics.org.au/ethics-explainer-existentialism/

Profile, D. (2020, January 18). Deontology vs utilitarianism? Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/post/deontology_vs_utilitarianism

Sauer, B. (2017, October 3). Know your design ethics: Deontological vs. utilitarian. Retrieved from https://slapdashery.org/know-your-design-ethics-deontological-vs-utilitarian-9a86a3e531d7?gi=27cfe7ded7de

Why it matters whether you believe in free will. (2013, May 23). Retrieved from https://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2013/05/why-it-matters-whether-you-believe-in-free-will/