Law and Politics

2/16/22, 11'05 AMComparing Politics, Law, Policy, and Power Scoring Guide

Page 1 of 1https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/SOC-FPX/SOC-FPX2000/190700/Scoring_Guides/u05a1_scoring_guide.html

Comparing Politics, Law, Policy, and Power Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Discuss contrasts in how states approach a diversity issue, using theoretical ideas of power.

Does not discuss contrasts in how states approach a diversity issue.

Discusses contrasts in how states approach a diversity issue but does not include appropriate theoretical ideas of power.

Discusses contrasts in how states approach a diversity issue, using theoretical ideas of power.

Discuss contrasts in how states approach a diversity issue, using theoretical ideas of power, and includes supporting citations from scholarly sources.

Discuss law, policy, or politics in states with varying approaches to a diversity issue.

Does not list differences in law, policy, or politics in states with varying approaches to a diversity issue

Lists differences in law, policy, or politics in states with varying approaches to a diversity issue.

Discusses differences in law, policy, or politics in states with varying approaches to a diversity issue.

Discusses differences in law, policy, or politics in states with varying approaches to a diversity issue and cites specific examples of their application.

Analyze data to project how state policies might affect population migration.

Does not analyze data to project how state policies might affect population migration.

Analyzes data but does not project a reasonable assessment of how state policies might affect population migration.

Analyzes data to project how state policies might affect population migration.

Analyzes data to project how state policies might affect population migration, including a discussion of past migrations for context and citations for scholarly sources.

Discuss contrasts between two states in areas of law, politics, or policy as they apply to a diversity issue.

Does not list contrasts between two states in areas of law, politics, or policy as they apply to a diversity issue.

Lists contrasts between two states in areas of law, politics, or policy as they apply to a diversity issue.

Discusses contrasts between two states in areas of law, politics, or policy as they apply to a diversity issue.

Discusses contrasts between two states in areas of law, politics, or policy as they apply to a diversity issue, including real-world examples of their application.

Apply historical solutions to an issue where there are discrepancies between state and federal diversity law.

Does not list historical solutions to an issue where there are discrepancies between state and federal diversity law.

Lists historical solutions to an issue where there are discrepancies between state and federal diversity law.

Applies historical solutions to an issue where there are discrepancies between state and federal diversity law.

Applies historical solutions to an issue where there are discrepancies between state and federal diversity law, and points out areas where the lessons learned might not be applicable.

Write coherently to support a central idea in appropriate format and with few errors of grammar, usage, and mechanics.

Does not write coherently to support a central idea in appropriate format. Does not use correct grammar, usage, and mechanics.

Writes to support an idea. Format is inconsistent and contains major errors of grammar, usage, and mechanics.

Writes coherently to support a central idea in appropriate format and with few errors of grammar, usage, and mechanics.

Writes coherently, using evidence to support a central idea in a consistently appropriate format with correct grammar, usage, and mechanics.