Comparative Study of Case Study Summaries With APA Table

2/26/23, 6:49 PM Comparative Study of Case Study Summaries With APA Table Scoring Guide

https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/DHA/DHA8032/220400/Scoring_Guides/u08a1_scoring_guide.html 1/2

Comparative Study of Case Study Summaries With APA Table Scoring Guide

Due Date: End of Unit 8 Percentage of Course Grade: 30%.

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED

Critically compare findings between Week 4 case study of learner and one other learner. 15%

Does not critically analyze differences between Week 4 case study of learner and one other learner.

Describes one difference between Week 4 case study of learner and one other learner.

Describes at least two differences and one similarity between Week 4 case study of learner and one other learner.

Describes at least three differences and two similarities between Week 4 Case study of learner and one other learner; OR finds three differences and two similarities between learner's summary and two other learners, allowing some mix and match.

Critically compare findings between Week 5 case study of learner and one other learner. 15%

Does not critically analyze differences between Week 5 case study of learner and one other learner.

Describes one difference between Week 5 case study of learner and one other learner.

Describes at least two differences and one similarity between Week 5 case study of learner and one other learner.

Describes at least three differences and two similarities between Week 5 Case study of learner and one other learner; OR finds three differences and two similarities between learner's summary and two other learners, allowing some mix and match.

Critically compare findings between Week 6 case study of learner and one other learner. 15%

Does not critically analyze differences between Week 6 case study of learner and one other learner.

Describes one difference between Week 6 case study of learner and one other learner.

Describes at least two differences and one similarity between Week 6 case study of learner and one other learner.

Describes at least three differences and two similarities between Week 6 Case study of learner and one other learner; OR finds three differences and two similarities between learner's summary and two other learners, allowing some mix and match.

Critically compare findings between Week 7 case study of learner and one other learner. 15%

Does not critically analyze differences between Week 7 case study of learner and one other learner.

Describes one difference between Week 7 case study of learner and one other learner.

Describes at least two differences and one similarity between Week 7 case study of learner and one other learner.

Describes at least three differences and two similarities between Week 7 Case study of learner and one other learner; OR finds three differences and two similarities between learner's summary and two other learners, allowing some mix and match.

Create an APA compliant table showing the comparison of Weeks 4, 5, 6, and 7 as summarized in the paper. 30%

Does not create a table.

Creates a table with comparisons that are not APA compliant.

Creates an APA compliant table showing the comparison of Weeks 4, 5, 6, and 7 as summarized in the paper, with some small formatting errors.

Creates an APA compliant table showing the comparison of Weeks 4, 5, 6, and 7 as summarized in the paper, which includes properly setting up the table's number, title, and any needed notes..

Write a clear and concise introduction

Does not create an introduction to the

Writes a wordy, too brief, or

Writes a clear introduction with a

Writes a clear and concise introduction to the paper, with

2/26/23, 6:49 PM Comparative Study of Case Study Summaries With APA Table Scoring Guide

https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/DHA/DHA8032/220400/Scoring_Guides/u08a1_scoring_guide.html 2/2

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED to the paper, with a thesis. 5%

paper. random introduction with no thesis or with an irrelevant thesis.

thesis. a thesis, in proper APA format and style.

Write a clear and concise summary to the paper, tying back to the original thesis of the paper. 5%

Does not write a summary to the paper.

Writes a wordy, too brief, or random summary with no tie-in to the introduction's thesis.

Writes a clear summary to the paper, tied to the thesis of the statement.

Writes a clear and concise summary, tied well to the thesis, and in proper APA format and style.