| Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
| | Dec. 31, 2016 |
| Accounting Policies [Abstract] |
| ESTIMATES IN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS | ESTIMATES IN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. |
| RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS | RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”. The goal of this update is to simplify several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2016-09 in the second quarter 2016, which required reflecting any adjustments as of January 1, 2016. The primary impact of adoption was the recognition of excess tax benefits as a reduction to the provision for income taxes. Additional amendments to ASU 2016-09 related to income taxes and minimum statutory withholding tax requirements had no impact to retained earnings, where the cumulative effect of these changes are required to be recorded. The Company also elected to continue estimating forfeitures when determining the amount of compensation costs to be recognized in each period. The presentation requirements for cash flows related to excess tax benefits were applied prospectively; as such, prior years have not been restated. The presentation requirements for cash flows related to employee taxes paid for withheld shares had no impact to any of the periods presented in the consolidated statement of cash flows, since such cash flows have historically been presented in financing activities. Lease Accounting In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company anticipates ASU 2016-02 to have a material impact on the consolidated balance sheet. Upon adoption, a portion of our franchise related revenue may be subject to the allocation provisions outlined in ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)". We are currently evaluating the specific implementation requirements, if any, for allocating consideration within our lessor contracts in accordance with ASU 2014-09. The impact of ASU 2016-02 is non-cash in nature, as such, it will not affect the Company’s cash flows. Income Taxes In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-16, “Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory”. The goal of this update is to improve the accounting for the income tax consequences of intra-entity transfers of assets other than inventory. ASU 2016-16 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual reporting periods. The Company anticipates that ASU 2016-16 may have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet, but little to no impact on the consolidated statement of income or the Company’s cash flows. Business Combinations In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-1, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business,” to clarify the definition of a business to assist organizations with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2017-1 in the fourth quarter 2016. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. |
| REVENUE RECOGNITION | REVENUE RECOGNITION The Company’s revenues consist of sales by Company-operated restaurants and fees from franchised restaurants operated by conventional franchisees, developmental licensees and foreign affiliates. Sales by Company-operated restaurants are recognized on a cash basis. The Company presents sales net of sales tax and other sales-related taxes. Revenues from conventional franchised restaurants include rent and royalties based on a percent of sales with minimum rent payments, and initial fees. Revenues from restaurants licensed to foreign affiliates and developmental licensees include a royalty based on a percent of sales, and may include initial fees. Continuing rent and royalties are recognized in the period earned. Initial fees are recognized upon opening of a restaurant or granting of a new franchise term, which is when the Company has performed substantially all initial services required by the franchise arrangement. In May 2014, the FASB issued guidance codified in the Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") 606, "Revenue Recognition - Revenue from Contracts with Customers," which amends the guidance in former ASC 605, "Revenue Recognition". The core principal of the standard is to recognize revenue when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration expected to be received for those goods or services. The standard also calls for additional disclosures around the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The standard will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption ("modified retrospective method"). The Company currently expects to apply the modified retrospective transition method upon adoption. The Company does not believe the standard will impact its recognition of revenue from company-operated restaurants or its recognition of royalties from restaurants operated by franchisees or licensed to affiliates and developmental licensees, which are based on a percent of sales. While we continue to assess the potential impacts to other less significant revenue transactions, we currently believe the standard will change the way initial fees from franchisees for new restaurant openings or new franchise terms are recognized. As noted above, the Company's current accounting policy is to recognize initial franchise fees when "earned" per the contract terms, which is currently when a new store opens or at the start of a new franchise term. In accordance with the new guidance, the initial franchise services are not distinct from the continuing rights or services offered during the term of the franchise agreement, and will therefore be treated as a single performance obligation. As such, initial fees received will likely be recognized over the franchise term. We do not anticipate this impact to be material to the Company’s consolidated statement of income, and the cumulative catch-up adjustment to be recorded as deferred revenue upon adoption is expected to be approximately 2% of the Company's consolidated long-term liabilities. No impact to the Company's consolidated statement of cash flows is expected as the initial fees will continue to be collected upon store opening date or the beginning of a new franchise term. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)," a portion of our franchise related revenue may be subject to the allocation provisions outlined within the revenue recognition standard. We are currently evaluating the specific implementation requirements, if any, for allocating consideration within our lessor contracts in accordance with the revenue recognition standard. |
| FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION | FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION Generally, the functional currency of operations outside the U.S. is the respective local currency. |
| ADVERTISING COSTS | ADVERTISING COSTS Advertising costs included in operating expenses of Company-operated restaurants primarily consist of contributions to advertising cooperatives and were (in millions): 2016 – $645.8 ; 2015 – $718.7 ; 2014 – $808.2 . Production costs for radio and television advertising are expensed when the commercials are initially aired. These production costs, primarily in the U.S., as well as other marketing-related expenses included in Selling, general & administrative expenses were (in millions): 2016 – $88.8 ; 2015 – $113.8 ; 2014 – $98.7 . Costs related to the Olympics sponsorship are included in these expenses for 2016 and 2014. In addition, significant advertising costs are incurred by franchisees through contributions to advertising cooperatives in individual markets. |
| SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION | SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION Share-based compensation includes the portion vesting of all share-based awards granted based on the grant date fair value. |
| PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT | PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment are stated at cost, with depreciation and amortization provided using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: buildings–up to 40 years; leasehold improvements– the lesser of useful lives of assets or lease terms , which generally include certain option periods; and equipment– three to 12 years. |
| LONG-LIVED ASSETS | LONG-LIVED ASSETS Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment annually in the fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. For purposes of annually reviewing assets for potential impairment, assets are initially grouped together in the U.S. at a television market level, and internationally, at a country level. The Company manages its restaurants as a group or portfolio with significant common costs and promotional activities; as such, an individual restaurant’s cash flows are not generally independent of the cash flows of others in a market. If an indicator of impairment exists for any grouping of assets, an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows produced by each individual restaurant within the asset grouping is compared to its carrying value. If an individual restaurant is determined to be impaired, the loss is measured by the excess of the carrying amount of the restaurant over its fair value as determined by an estimate of discounted future cash flows. Losses on assets held for disposal are recognized when management and the Board of Directors, as required, have approved and committed to a plan to dispose of the assets, the assets are available for disposal and the disposal is probable of occurring within 12 months, and the net sales proceeds are expected to be less than its net book value, among other factors. Generally, such losses related to restaurants that have closed and ceased operations as well as other assets that meet the criteria to be considered “available for sale." |
| FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS | FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS The Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value on a recurring basis, and certain non-financial assets and liabilities on a nonrecurring basis. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Fair value disclosures are reflected in a three-level hierarchy, maximizing the use of observable inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability on the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows: ▪ Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for an identical asset or liability in an active market. ▪ Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for a similar asset or liability in an active market or model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. ▪ Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement of the asset or liability. Certain of the Company’s derivatives are valued using various pricing models or discounted cash flow analyses that incorporate observable market parameters, such as interest rate yield curves, option volatilities and currency rates, classified as Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy. Derivative valuations incorporate credit risk adjustments that are necessary to reflect the probability of default by the counterparty or the Company. ▪ Certain Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value The following tables present financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by the valuation hierarchy as defined in the fair value guidance: December 31, 2016 In millions Level 1* Level 2 Carrying Value Derivative assets $ 134.3 $ 47.0 $ 181.3 Derivative liabilities $ (5.6 ) $ (5.6 ) December 31, 2015 In millions Level 1* Level 2 Carrying Value Derivative assets $ 139.9 $ 65.4 $ 205.3 Derivative liabilities $ (44.4 ) $ (44.4 ) * Level 1 is comprised of derivatives that hedge market driven changes in liabilities associated with the Company’s supplemental benefit plans. ▪ Non-Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the assets and liabilities are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis, but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (e.g., when there is evidence of impairment). For the year ended December 31, 2016 , the Company recorded fair value adjustments to its long-lived assets, primarily to goodwill, based on Level 3 inputs which includes the use of a discounted cash flow valuation approach. ▪ Certain Financial Assets and Liabilities not Measured at Fair Value At December 31, 2016 , the fair value of the Company’s debt obligations was estimated at $27.5 billion , compared to a carrying amount of $26.0 billion . The fair value was based on quoted market prices, Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy. The carrying amount for both cash equivalents and notes receivable approximate fair value. |
| FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES | FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES The Company is exposed to global market risks, including the effect of changes in interest rates and foreign currency fluctuations. The Company uses foreign currency denominated debt and derivative instruments to mitigate the impact of these changes. The Company does not hold or issue derivatives for trading purposes. The Company documents its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking hedging transactions, as well as all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items. The Company’s derivatives that are designated for hedge accounting consist mainly of interest rate swaps, foreign currency forwards, foreign currency options, and cross-currency swaps, and are classified as either fair value, cash flow or net investment hedges. Further details are explained in the "Fair Value," "Cash Flow" and "Net Investment" hedge sections. The Company also enters into certain derivatives that are not designated for hedge accounting. The Company has entered into equity derivative contracts, including total return swaps, to hedge market-driven changes in certain of its supplemental benefit plan liabilities. In addition, the Company uses foreign currency forwards to mitigate the change in fair value of certain foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. Further details are explained in the “Undesignated Derivatives” section. All derivatives (including those not designated for hedge accounting) are recognized on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value and classified based on the instruments’ maturity dates. Changes in the fair value measurements of the derivative instruments are reflected as adjustments to accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI") and/or current earnings. The following table presents the fair values of derivative instruments included on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 : Derivative Assets Derivative Liabilities In millions Balance Sheet Classification 2016 2015 Balance Sheet Classification 2016 2015 Derivatives designated as hedging instruments Foreign currency Prepaid expenses and other current assets $ 31.7 $ 55.0 Accrued payroll and other liabilities $ (2.0 ) $ (22.5 ) Interest rate Prepaid expenses and other current assets 1.0 — Foreign currency Miscellaneous other assets 2.5 0.6 Other long-term liabilities (0.1 ) (13.0 ) Interest rate Miscellaneous other assets 1.7 5.3 Other long-term liabilities (1.6 ) (3.4 ) Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments $ 36.9 $ 60.9 $ (3.7 ) $ (38.9 ) Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments Equity Prepaid expenses and other current assets $ 134.3 $ 0.3 Accrued payroll and other liabilities $ (1.9 ) $ — Foreign currency Prepaid expenses and other current assets 10.1 4.2 Accrued payroll and other liabilities — (5.5 ) Equity Miscellaneous other assets — 139.9 Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments $ 144.4 $ 144.4 $ (1.9 ) $ (5.5 ) Total derivatives $ 181.3 $ 205.3 $ (5.6 ) $ (44.4 ) Fair Value Hedges The Company enters into fair value hedges to reduce the exposure to changes in the fair values of certain liabilities. The Company's fair value hedges convert a portion of its fixed-rate debt into floating-rate debt by use of interest rate swaps. At December 31, 2016 , $2.5 billion of the Company's outstanding fixed-rate debt was effectively converted. All of the Company’s interest rate swaps meet the shortcut method requirements. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are exactly offset by changes in the fair value of the underlying debt. No ineffectiveness has been recorded to net income related to interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges for the year ended December 31, 2016 . Derivatives in Hedging Relationships Gain (Loss) Recognized In Earnings on Hedging Derivative Gain (Loss) Recognized In Earnings on Hedged Items In millions 2016 2015 2016 2015 Interest rate $ (1.8 ) $ (3.4 ) $ 1.8 $ 3.4 Cash Flow Hedges The Company enters into cash flow hedges to reduce the exposure to variability in certain expected future cash flows. The types of cash flow hedges the Company enters into include interest rate swaps, foreign currency forwards, foreign currency options and cross currency swaps. The effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives are reported as a component of AOCI and reclassified into earnings in the same period in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The Company excludes the time value of foreign currency options from its effectiveness assessment. As a result, changes in the fair value of the derivatives due to this component, as well as the ineffectiveness of the hedges, are recognized immediately in earnings. Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCI (Effective Portion) Gain (Loss) Reclassified From AOCI Into Earnings (Effective Portion) Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings (Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing and Ineffective Portion) Derivatives in Hedging Relationships In millions 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 Foreign currency $ 28.6 $ 35.3 $ 24.6 $ 53.0 $ — $ 22.9 Interest rate (1) — — (0.5 ) (0.5 ) — — $ 28.6 $ 35.3 $ 24.1 $ 52.5 $ — $ 22.9 (1) The amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings is recorded in interest expense . The Company periodically uses interest rate swaps to effectively convert a portion of floating-rate debt, including forecasted debt issuances, into fixed-rate debt. The agreements are intended to reduce the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense. To protect against the reduction in value of forecasted foreign currency cash flows (such as royalties denominated in foreign currencies), the Company uses foreign currency forwards and foreign currency options to hedge a portion of anticipated exposures. When the U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign currencies, the decline in value of future foreign denominated royalties is offset by gains in the fair value of the foreign currency forwards and/or foreign currency options. Conversely, when the U.S. dollar weakens, the increase in the value of future foreign denominated royalties is offset by losses in the fair value of the foreign currency forwards and/or foreign currency options. Although the fair value changes in the foreign currency options may fluctuate over the period of the contract, the Company’s total loss on a foreign currency option is limited to the upfront premium paid for the contract; however, the potential gains on a foreign currency option are unlimited. The hedges cover the next 18 months for certain exposures and are denominated in various currencies. As of December 31, 2016 , the Company had derivatives outstanding with an equivalent notional amount of $632.0 million that were used to hedge a portion of forecasted foreign currency denominated royalties. The Company recorded after tax adjustments to the cash flow hedging component of AOCI in shareholders’ equity. The Company recorded an increase of $2.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 and a decrease of $11.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 . Based on interest rates and foreign exchange rates at December 31, 2016 , there is $22.9 million in after-tax cumulative cash flow hedging gains which is not expected to have a significant effect on earnings over the next 12 months. Net Investment Hedges The Company primarily uses foreign currency denominated debt (third party and intercompany) to hedge its investments in certain foreign subsidiaries and affiliates. Realized and unrealized translation adjustments from these hedges are included in the foreign currency translation component of AOCI, as well as the offset translation adjustments on the underlying net assets of foreign subsidiaries and affiliates. The cumulative translation gains or losses will remain in AOCI until the foreign subsidiaries and affiliates are liquidated or sold. As of December 31, 2016 , $8.6 billion of third party foreign currency denominated debt, $3.3 billion of intercompany foreign currency denominated debt, and $393.0 million of derivatives were designated to hedge investments in certain foreign subsidiaries and affiliates. Derivatives in Hedging Relationships Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCI (Effective Portion) In millions 2016 2015 Foreign currency denominated debt $ 654.9 $ 668.1 Foreign currency derivatives 9.9 79.1 $ 664.8 $ 747.2 Undesignated Derivatives The Company enters into certain derivatives that are not designated for hedge accounting, therefore the changes in the fair value of these derivatives are recognized immediately in earnings together with the gain or loss from the hedged balance sheet position. As an example, the Company enters into equity derivative contracts, including total return swaps, to hedge market-driven changes in certain of its supplemental benefit plan liabilities. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives are recorded in Selling, general & administrative expenses together with the changes in the supplemental benefit plan liabilities. In addition, the Company uses foreign currency forwards to mitigate the change in fair value of certain foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. The changes in the fair value of these derivatives are recognized in Nonoperating (income) expense, net, along with the currency gain or loss from the hedged balance sheet position. Derivatives Not Designated for Hedge Accounting Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings In millions 2016 2015 Foreign currency $ 4.3 $ 14.6 Equity 26.0 38.9 $ 30.3 $ 53.5 Credit Risk The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of non-performance by the counterparties to its hedging instruments. The counterparties to these agreements consist of a diverse group of financial institutions and market participants. The Company continually monitors its positions and the credit ratings of its counterparties and adjusts positions as appropriate. The Company did not have significant exposure to any individual counterparty at December 31, 2016 and has master agreements that contain netting arrangements. For financial reporting purposes, the Company presents gross derivative balances in the financial statements and supplementary data, even for counterparties subject to netting arrangements. Some of these agreements also require each party to post collateral if credit ratings fall below, or aggregate exposures exceed, certain contractual limits. At December 31, 2016 , the Company was required to post an immaterial amount of collateral due to negative fair value of certain derivative positions. The Company's counterparties were not required to post collateral on any derivative position, other than on hedges of certain of the Company’s supplemental benefit plan liabilities where the counterparties were required to post collateral on their liability positions. |
| INCOME TAX UNCERTAINTIES | INCOME TAX UNCERTAINTIES The Company, like other multi-national companies, is regularly audited by federal, state and foreign tax authorities, and tax assessments may arise several years after tax returns have been filed. Accordingly, tax liabilities are recorded when, in management’s judgment, a tax position does not meet the more likely than not threshold for recognition. For tax positions that meet the more likely than not threshold, a tax liability may still be recorded depending on management’s assessment of how the tax position will ultimately be settled. The Company records interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes. |
| PER COMMON SHARE INFORMATION | PER COMMON SHARE INFORMATION Diluted earnings per common share is calculated using net income divided by diluted weighted-average shares. Diluted weighted-average shares include weighted-average shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of share-based compensation calculated using the treasury stock method, of (in millions of shares): 2016 – 6.8 ; 2015 – 5.2 ; 2014 – 5.8 . Stock options that were not included in diluted weighted-average shares because they would have been antidilutive were (in millions of shares): 2016 – 1.2 ; 2015 – 1.0 ; 2014 – 5.3 . |
| CASH AND EQUIVALENTS | CASH AND EQUIVALENTS The Company considers short-term, highly liquid investments with an original maturity of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents. |
| SUBSEQUENT EVENTS | SUBSEQUENT EVENTS The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). In January 2017, the Company’s Board of Directors approved and the Company entered into a definitive agreement with a developmental licensee organization to sell its existing businesses in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden (referred to as the "Nordics") in connection with the Company's refranchising initiatives. The Nordics comprise nearly 450 restaurants, the vast majority of which are operated by independent franchisees. The Company expects to complete the transaction around the end of the first quarter, subject to satisfaction of customary conditions. Based on approval by the Board of Directors, the Company concluded the Nordics was “held for sale” in accordance with the requirements of ASC 360 "Property, Plant and Equipment". Accordingly, the Company has ceased recording depreciation expense with respect to the Nordics effective January 26, 2017. As of December 31, 2016, the Nordics' total assets and total liabilities were $439 million and $64 million , respectively. Cash proceeds upon the completion of the sale are estimated to be approximately $450 million . No significant gains or losses are expected to be recognized upon the close of the transaction. There were no other subsequent events that required recognition or disclosure. |
| Share-Based Compensation Expense and Effect on Diluted Earnings Per Common Share | Share-based compensation expense and the effect on diluted earnings per common share were as follows: In millions, except per share data 2016 2015 2014 Share-based compensation expense $ 131.3 $ 110.0 $ 112.8 After tax $ 89.6 $ 76.0 $ 72.8 Earnings per common share-diluted $ 0.11 $ 0.08 $ 0.08 |
| Weighted-Average Assumptions | The following table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the option pricing model for the 2016 , 2015 and 2014 stock option grants. The expected life of the options represents the period of time the options are expected to be outstanding and is based on historical trends. Expected stock price volatility is generally based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock for a period approximating the expected life. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s most recent annual dividend rate. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant with a term equal to the expected life. Weighted-average assumptions 2016 2015 2014 Expected dividend yield 3.0 % 3.6 % 3.3 % Expected stock price volatility 19.2 % 18.8 % 20.0 % Risk-free interest rate 1.2 % 1.7 % 2.0 % Expected life of options (in years) 5.9 6.0 6.1 Fair value per option granted $ 13.65 $ 10.43 $ 12.23 |
| Activity in Goodwill by Segment | The following table presents the 2016 activity in goodwill by segment: In millions U.S. International Lead Markets High Growth Markets Foundational Markets & Corporate Consolidated Balance at December 31, 2015 $ 1,293.4 $ 698.1 $ 322.4 $ 202.4 $ 2,516.3 Net restaurant purchases (sales) (10.1 ) 3.3 3.0 (67.1 ) (70.9 ) Impairment losses — — — (39.9 ) (39.9 ) Currency translation (20.2 ) (7.7 ) (4.0 ) (31.9 ) Assets of businesses held for sale — — (37.6 ) 0.5 (37.1 ) Balance at December 31, 2016 $ 1,283.3 $ 681.2 $ 280.1 $ 91.9 $ 2,336.5 |
| Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on Recurring Basis | The following tables present financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by the valuation hierarchy as defined in the fair value guidance: December 31, 2016 In millions Level 1* Level 2 Carrying Value Derivative assets $ 134.3 $ 47.0 $ 181.3 Derivative liabilities $ (5.6 ) $ (5.6 ) December 31, 2015 In millions Level 1* Level 2 Carrying Value Derivative assets $ 139.9 $ 65.4 $ 205.3 Derivative liabilities $ (44.4 ) $ (44.4 ) * Level 1 is comprised of derivatives that hedge market driven changes in liabilities associated with the Company’s supplemental benefit plans. |
| Fair Values of Derivative Instruments Included on Consolidated Balance Sheet | The following table presents the fair values of derivative instruments included on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 : Derivative Assets Derivative Liabilities In millions Balance Sheet Classification 2016 2015 Balance Sheet Classification 2016 2015 Derivatives designated as hedging instruments Foreign currency Prepaid expenses and other current assets $ 31.7 $ 55.0 Accrued payroll and other liabilities $ (2.0 ) $ (22.5 ) Interest rate Prepaid expenses and other current assets 1.0 — Foreign currency Miscellaneous other assets 2.5 0.6 Other long-term liabilities (0.1 ) (13.0 ) Interest rate Miscellaneous other assets 1.7 5.3 Other long-term liabilities (1.6 ) (3.4 ) Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments $ 36.9 $ 60.9 $ (3.7 ) $ (38.9 ) Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments Equity Prepaid expenses and other current assets $ 134.3 $ 0.3 Accrued payroll and other liabilities $ (1.9 ) $ — Foreign currency Prepaid expenses and other current assets 10.1 4.2 Accrued payroll and other liabilities — (5.5 ) Equity Miscellaneous other assets — 139.9 Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments $ 144.4 $ 144.4 $ (1.9 ) $ (5.5 ) Total derivatives $ 181.3 $ 205.3 $ (5.6 ) $ (44.4 ) |
| Derivatives Pretax Amounts Affecting Income and Other Comprehensive Income | Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCI (Effective Portion) Gain (Loss) Reclassified From AOCI Into Earnings (Effective Portion) Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings (Amount Excluded from Effectiveness Testing and Ineffective Portion) Derivatives in Hedging Relationships In millions 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 Foreign currency $ 28.6 $ 35.3 $ 24.6 $ 53.0 $ — $ 22.9 Interest rate (1) — — (0.5 ) (0.5 ) — — $ 28.6 $ 35.3 $ 24.1 $ 52.5 $ — $ 22.9 (1) The amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings is recorded in interest expense . Derivatives in Hedging Relationships Gain (Loss) Recognized In Earnings on Hedging Derivative Gain (Loss) Recognized In Earnings on Hedged Items In millions 2016 2015 2016 2015 Interest rate $ (1.8 ) $ (3.4 ) $ 1.8 $ 3.4 Derivatives in Hedging Relationships Gain (Loss) Recognized in AOCI (Effective Portion) In millions 2016 2015 Foreign currency denominated debt $ 654.9 $ 668.1 Foreign currency derivatives 9.9 79.1 $ 664.8 $ 747.2 Derivatives Not Designated for Hedge Accounting Gain (Loss) Recognized in Earnings In millions 2016 2015 Foreign currency $ 4.3 $ 14.6 Equity 26.0 38.9 $ 30.3 $ 53.5 |
hanxuji
CompanyAFinancials2017.xlsx
