Master's Level Educational Psychology Power Point Communicating Program Results
Print
Communicating Program Evaluation Results Scoring Guide
Communicating Program Evaluation Results Scoring Guide| Criteria | Non-performance | Basic | Proficient | Distinguished |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Describe methods in enough detail that other evaluators would able to replicate them. | Does not describe methods. | Describes methods, but they are incomplete or there is not enough detail that other evaluators would able to replicate them. | Describes methods in enough detail that other evaluators would able to replicate them. | Describes comprehensive methods concisely but in enough detail that other evaluators would able to replicate them. |
| Describe efforts to mitigate difficulties and limitations of an evaluation approach. | Does not describe difficulties and limitations of an evaluation approach. | Describes difficulties and limitations of an evaluation approach but does not describe feasible strategies to mitigate all of them. | Describes strategies to mitigate difficulties and limitations of evaluation methods. | Comprehensively analyzes difficulties and limitations of evaluation methods and concisely evaluates best strategies to mitigate them. |
| Present the key findings of an evaluation in a clear and impactful manner. | Does not present findings of an evaluation. | Presents findings of an evaluation but not all are clear or presented in an impactful manner. | Presents the key findings of an evaluation in a clear and impactful manner. | Employs enhanced written and/or visual communication to present key findings of an evaluation in a clear and impactful manner. |
| Make specific recommendations based on interpretation of findings. | Does not make relevant recommendations. | Makes recommendations that are too general or not well supported by interpretation of findings. | Makes specific recommendations supported by interpretation of findings. | Draws a clear line of sight from sound methods that produce accurate findings through cogent interpretation leading to actionable, well considered recommendations to sustain or improve program effectiveness. |
| Employ appropriate written and visual communication to convey content to an intended audience. | Many elements of written and visual communication would impede reception of content by intended audience. | Employs appropriate written and visual communication overall, but some elements would impede reception of content by intended audience. | Employs appropriate written and visual communication to convey content to an intended audience. | Throughout the presentation enhanced written and/or visual communication are employed to aid reception of content by intended audience. |
| Comply with APA guidelines for style and formatting. | Does not use APA format and style. | Uses APA format and style but inconsistently and with errors. | Complies with APA guidelines with few minor errors. | Complies with APA guidelines consistently with no errors. |