Cultural Profile Paper Folder
>*,.+"-n', \y (r
Namhee Thompson COMM I74 Dr. Rona Halualani M'-ch24.2004
Culture And Society
Human societies are distinguished by different cultures. Cultures bring people into
groups with others who share common beliefs, values, attitudes, and so on. Those pictures
from my college show how they symbolize my culture (Korean) and how they influence me.
The picture of man is Confucius, whose teachings were predominant in Korean
culture for many years. We have to talk about Confucianism when we want to understand
the Korean culture. The important point of Confucianism is that a good family creates a
good society. Confucianism is Confucius' teachings ofhow an individual should live and
interact with others, and the forms of society and govemment in which he should participate.
He emphasized values of order, hierarchy and deference to authority, reflected in the
traditional "wulun rules of deference," for example, subordination ofchild to parents,
student to teacher, young to old, wife to husband, citizen to ruler. The most important value
of Confucius' teaching is the value of filial piety because it describes the correct way to act
towards one's parents: be respectful, polite, considerate, loyal, helpful, dutiful, and obedient.
Confucius considered filial piety an imperative moral conduct. To Korean and other
Confucian heritage cultures, it is the central ideolory that provides the foundation for all
other attitudes.
The picture of my family shows how my culture values one's own family because
family members share common blood. Thus, our society values close relationships within
family and clan. For us, common blood means everything; therefore, we share one's success
and failure. lfan elder brother gains a success and wealth, then he shares it with other family
members and takes care of his younger siblings and parents. However, if he fails in
something, this means whole family loses face. Every family member takes care of each
other.
The value of filial piety (the picture ofChinese words) is above any other values,
because Confucius teaches that ifone does not have piety towards one's own parents, then he
or she can not be loyal towards his or her friends, country, or any other person or group.
Confucianism teaches that my parents may be seen as my life in the past and my children in
the future. Therefore, a parents' duty is to give support to their children because if their
children are well off, then subsequent generations after their children will be better off.
However, a child's duty is to take care oftheir aged parents because their parents sacrificed
their lives for their children. So, it is a duty ofchildren to look after their aged parents. I have
this same duty toward my mother. She is my responsibility. Thus, it can be argued that I
have to gain wealth to support my mother.
The picture of an American is my husband. My behavior is changed when I am with
him. Since he is an American, he values individualism and does not have the same
perception toward filial duty that I do. He does not think that he has the filial duty toward his
parents. We also have an equal relationship in our house. I do the housework, and he does
the yard work. Moreover, I do not have to cook many dishes for him' He only prefers to
have a main meal. It is much different from my own culture. In my culture, a wife cooks
many dishes for one meal because we eat a bowl of rice with many side dishes, and the wife
cooks meals three times per day.
The next picture is my dog, Norton. Living with him changed my attitudes toward
dogs. In my culture, dogs are not human companions. We separate our lives from animals'
lives and consider them to have a different position in society. Therefore, they have to live
outdoors and eat leftover human food. However, my perception about dogs has changed
\
since I got Norton. Norton lives in indoors and sleeps with me. I take him to a veterinarian
regularly (actually, we spend a lot of money on his hospital bills). He is a part of my family.
The picture ofthe computer keyboard and earth shows how I think ofthe world.
Since the mid-1990s, the lntemet spreads out the world. With the Intemet, people get
information, and send emails and instant messages. The Intemet removes geographical and
time barriers. It reduces cultural barriers too. People participate in games and communicate
with people from other countries. The Intemet also removes the ethnicity, gender, and the
age of its users because it is a contextual communication method.
The cultural pattem that seems to operate in my life is collectivism. According to
Hofstede ( 1998), collective culture tends to be like groups. He says that collective culture
tends to have a high context, high/low uncertainty avoidance, high power distance, and high
masculinity whereas individualism culture tends to have low context, high uncertainty
avoidance, low/medium power distance, and masculinity/femininity. My cultural
backgromd is based on collectivism that contains high context, middle-high uncertainty
avoidance, and masculinity.
People from collective cultures tend to belong to groups. They feel comfortable when
they belong to groups of like individuals. Their lives are spent belonging to many groups:
family, school, friends, and work. For example, students in Korea and Japan wear uniforms,
which give them a sense ofbelonging to their schools. Each school has its own designed
uniform that distinguishes its students from other schools' students. Another example is that
in the culture of collectivism, people do not like to have a meal alone. They always have
someone to eat with them.
In high context culture, people do not have a concept of "on time." Their view of
time is "in time." And, they emphasize building trust in every relationship. Therefore, they
prefer to build relationship first when they conduct business. Another example ofhigh
context culture is the business card and handshake when doing business. When people meet
their business partner, they first shake their hand and then exchange their business cards. In
Korea, people should have their own business card to give out. In high context culture,
people have indirect communication, such as nonverbal communication, which is important
when people have a conversation. Also, saving face both personally and professionally is
important to them.
My cultural pattem also has high uncertainty avoidance, high power distance, and
masculinity. I think Korean cultural pattern is high uncertainty avoidance because people use
the Intemet to find answers whenever, they have unanswered questions. Korean society is a
patriarchy and patrilineal society in which the family name, properties, and assets are passed
along the male line ofdescendents. Therefore, this masculinity drives from these patrilineal
and patriarchy social system as well as high power distance.
Confucianism reflects every cultural pattem of mine that I explain above. It reflects
values, beliefs, and the overall worldview of my culture because it is a main philosophy
among Koreans that has deep roots in the society. Therefore, as a Confucian society, Koreans
value the harmony based on individual inequalities, and individual interest can be sacrificed
for the benefit of society.
A Confucian society emphasizes indirect communication and conflict avoidance
rather than clarification. Understanding Korean culture is essential to communicating with
one another. For example, ifthe consultant has some appreciation ofthe traditional values
rooted in the Confucian doctrines, he or she may hesitate to insist on certain opinions or point
out some errors related to the project. Thus, communication could be vague, aad it would be
required to leam to "read between the lines" to understand the content. Americans, because
of their strong tradition of freedom of expression, tend to be perceived as extremely vocal
and opinionated to the Korean consultant, which might make the consultant feel
uncomfortable expressi ng some opi nions.
The cultural pattems (Confucius based collectivism) have influence by behavior very
much, but my norms of behaviors are somewhat divided. When I am with my parents,
brothers, or friends, my norms ofbehaviors or commutation styles change into traditional
Korean ways. However, my norms of behaviors or commutation styles are more
individualistic when I am with my husband, or among American friends. Therefore, cultwe is
flexible regarding collectivism or individualism because culture reflects a society where
people set up the norm of behaviors, values, beliefs, etc. I had to change my cultural
behavior when my living environment changed. For example, living in Califomia for the last
eight years has changed me, because I have had to adjust to American culture in order to be
comfo(able living in America. Therefore, I am flexible in both cultures when I deal with
them.
The article, Chinese and North Americans, by Ling Chen (1998) shows that Chinese
culture is similar to Korean culture in many ways. Basically both cultures are predominated
by Confucianism, which shares similar cultural pattems and worldviews. Both cultures are
collectivism cultures that emphasize harmony ofsociety based on Confucius' teachings as
well as Taoism. Confucianism believes that the world is in unity with yin and yang; therefore,
we should value both human beings and spirituals. One ritual of ancestor worship shows a
good example ofthis worldview: both Chinese and Koreans believe that one's ancestor's
spirits look after their decedents.
First, both cultures value their interpersonal relationships, where people share
personal opinions and offer advice on everyday matters. They are also concemed about
everyone's business, as it is their own. Second, both cultures are hierarchical societies that
derive from the oatriarchv and patrilineal social svstems the value that the male line is more
impo(ant than the female line. They are male dominated cultures. Third, communication
style is indirect in both cultures, so nonverbal body or facial expressions are important to
understand the real meaning ofa conversation. They also do not display their feelings or
emotions because displaying feelings or emotions is not considered to be a good virtue,
especially for men. Forth, both cultures separate animals from human lives because animals
are positioned below human beings. Therefore, they do not use a pronoun to call their
animals. Last, both cultures have a similar way ofhosting visitors. A Chinese person offers
comfort and food continuously to their visitors. Koreans also host their visitors in the same
way. Most of above points are similar to my case, but the point of animals is different in my
case. For me, Norton is my family (he is like my baby), so I use a pronoun when I call him.
Moreover, I talk like his mom when I talk to his doctor.
We cannot distinguish worldview, culture, and communication differently because
these are related to one other. When we talk about worldview, we have to talk culture first,
and talk about communication when we talk about culture as well. According to the course
reading from Samovar & Porter, the worldview is defined as the "orientation that we hold
towards religion, nature, life, death, and the universe, philosophical issues conceming the
meaning of life and existence." One's worldview is abstracted from one's culture, because
culture is a system of shared beliefs, values, customs, behaviors, and artifacts. For example,
my culture believes in the existence of spirits, so I see the world as a harmony of nature and
humans. Communication also varies with one's culture. For example, in Korean culture' the
communication style is indirect whereas American style is very direct. Therefore, my
communication style is more like the indirect style because ofmy cultural background; I do
not want to hurt another person's feelings by anlthing I say. Moreover, it is hard for me to
change my style of communication even though I have lived in Califomia for years. I still
have a hard time saying "no" to others. In short, worldview, culture, and communication are
related to each other. They are all influenced by one another, so we have to consider all three
of them when with talk about worldvieq culture, or communication.
Referpnce:
Cheru L. (198). Chinese and North Americans: An epistemological exploration of intercultural communication. In J.N. Martin, T.k.Nakayama" L.A.Flores @ds.), Readinss in cultural contexts Gp,357-369). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield. Retrieved March 21, 2004, from Communication Studies 174 Course Reading
Hofstede, G. (1998). I, we, and they. In J.N.Martin, T.K.Nakayama L.A.Flores (Eds.), Readings in cultural contexts (pp.345-356). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield. Retrieved Marchzl, 2004,from Communication Shrdies 174 Course Reading