Communication- Argumentation and Persuasion
COM 470: Argumentation and Persuasion
Week 7, Tuesday, 10/6
Overview
The Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM)
Thursday’s class – activity and review for Exam 2
Reminders:
Exam on Tuesday, 10/13
Discuss Cognitive Dissonance Theory on Thursday, 10/15
Please read Chapter 9 and Case study 10
Discuss Inoculation Theory on Saturday, 10/17
Please read Chapter 5, pp. 108-115; Case study 9
Thought….
Think about some of television commercials. How do these make the best use of persuasion?
Doritos/SuperBowl – relate and humor (dogs thru screens)
Geiko – fun and humor/ fast paced even with plot (?)
Pepsi – motor expressions and excitement and pride
DisneyWorld – peripheral not paying attention to details; just fun in Disney; characters to appeal to children
Dunkin Donuts – Gronk or Ortiz; know the audience; credibility ~ peripheral route
To Begin….
Both of these commercials are for the same product. Why did they have two different ones?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rv1qDKmo-ss
https://www.ispot.tv/ad/7fLa/2014-ram-1500-truck-of-the-year
Central route – second commercial; things into car to make it best; fact at end
Peripheral route – first commercial; humor, persuading on ad not product; appeals to everyone (with use of the song)
Audience assumptions – some want facts others want feeling; reach more people; trying to find out who likes facts or the superficial
ELM – Two routes to persuasion– this is a continuum
Central Route
High products/high involvement
Care about message and what said
Less subject to counter-argument
Need high motivation and ability to understand message
Carefully examine arguments
Attitudes changed/formed under route last longer
Peripheral Route
Don’t care as much about the message
More emotion based
Influenced by outside factors
Rely on peripheral cues (heuristics)
Message not as direct
Low elaboration/easier less stressful processing
Attitude change not as strong
5
Motivation to procesS
Factors influence the degree of elaboration
Involvement (personal relevance), and this referred outcome involvement
Personal responsibility – centrally process if responsible for outcomes
How likely to be impacted – central route; genuine interest in topic; relate to it; could happen to you
Impression you get from the message
Incongruent information – receiving something unexpected from your own values/beliefs
Need for cognition– innate need to think
6
Ability to process
Message comprehension – ability the information to be understood; organization and word choice
Distraction—good or bad; persuasion could happen – peripheral route
Prior knowledge
Message repetition
Audience demographics could influence ability to process~prior knowledge and also word choice
Connect to the person the in the message
7
Central Route
Elaboration valence—the more positive the issue-relevant thoughts are by the receiver the more successful the persuasive efforts will be
Two major influences on elaboration valence (positive or negative)
Pro-attitudinal messages are more persuasive than counter-attitudinal
Counter-attitudinal messages can be persuasive though
Thus argument strength becomes important
Stronger arguments will be more persuasive (~ quality)
Peripheral Route– Peripheral cues
Mental shortcut
Source credibility
Attractiveness
Rewards and punishments – rewards
Humor (and emotions)
Number of arguments
Audience reaction
Consensus – other believe it, it must be true
Liking
9
Influence of variables
The key question is when a variable is likely to play a given role; ELM offers a “general rule”
When elaboration is low, a variable is more likely to serve as a peripheral cue
When elaboration is high, a variable is more likely to influence elaboration valence
When elaboration is moderate, a variable is more likely to influence the degree of elaboration
Message Persuasion Guidelines
Identify common objective you want to share with the audience
Identify if you want to central or peripheral
Know audience attitudes, involvement (personal relevance), values, level of cognitive understanding, considerations of motivation and ability to process; argument is good quality; know if audience will be distracted; know prior knowledge
If a large audience, use both the peripheral and central routes to persuade
Adapting persuasive messages
Messages should be adapted to the audience’s likely level of elaboration
Can also attempt to influence the likely degree of elaboration
When one expects counter-arguing, it might be better to limit the amount of elaboration
Adapting messages -- Argument strength
High-quality message is defined as one that is more persuasive when people pay close attention to the message
This definition does not help to explain what makes an argument strong
Messages that promote a more desirable outcome are more persuasive and considered stronger
It is expected that messages about outcome likelihood might have similar effects
Let’s ReCAP
In groups, answer the following questions:
1. Is the Apple 1 advertisement aiming at central or peripheral processing for its audience? What are the elements of central or peripheral processing be used?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hs1HoLs4SD0
2. Is the Apple 2 advertisement aiming at central or peripheral processing for its audience? What are the elements of central or peripheral processing be used?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZT4ZbwgIK3w
3. What type of audience would these two commercials be directed to? What are they assuming about the audience?
Brief Review – Elm and Emotional Appeals
In this Nationwide Mutual Insurance advertisement, what emotional appeals are being used and what action tendencies are being elicited? Is the advertisement relying upon peripheral or central processing? Why?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_TDG9EKEi-I
In this CDC anti-smoking advertisement, please explain how it is using (or not using) the steps and criteria for an effective fear appeal.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yb0zDUzSktY
Next time…
Discuss more of the ELM and its application
Review for Exam 2
Reminders:
Exam on Tuesday, 10/13
Discuss Cognitive Dissonance Theory on Thursday, 10/15
Please read Chapter 9 and Case study 10
Discuss Inoculation Theory on Saturday, 10/17
Please read Chapter 5, pp. 108-115; Case study 9