Research Essay
ORIGINAL PAPER
College Students Opinions on Gun Violence
Rhonda K. Lewis1 • Jamie LoCurto1 • Kyrah Brown2 • David Stowell1 •
J’Vonnah Maryman1 • Amber Dean1 • Thoi McNair1 • Debbie Ojeda1 •
Julia Siwierka1
Published online: 29 October 2015
� Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015
Abstract Gun violence and control issues have become
serious public health problems. This study gathered the
opinions from 419 college students from a Midwestern
University. Participants were asked about beliefs about
purchasing assault weapons, beliefs about bringing hand-
guns to college campuses and beliefs about contributing
factors that lead to gun violence. Participants completed
surveys online. The findings showed that overall 54 % of
respondents believed that military assault weapons should
be banned and 53 % agree that teachers should be allowed
to carry a registered handgun on campus. There were
statistically significant differences between males and
females on these issues. For instance, females believed
military assault weapons and high capacity magazines
should be banned more than 1.9 times (p = .004) p \ .05 compared to male students. On the other hand, female
students were more likely to believe that school teachers
should be allowed to carry registered handguns on school
campuses more than 1.55 times (p = .046) p \ .05 com- pared to their male student counterparts. There were no
statistically significant differences between ethnic groups.
The top four contributing factors that students believed led
to gun violence were decline in parenting and family values
(17 %), gang involvement (14 %), bullying (13.8 %) and
guns being easy to obtain (13.8 %). Limitations and
implications for policy work are discussed.
Keywords Gun violence � College students � Opinions � Gun control
Introduction
Gun violence is now seen as a public health issue and
interventions are needed to address the problem [1].
America’s focus on gun violence began in 1999 with
Columbine’s high school shooting; with 15 killed and 21
injured, this attack is still termed the deadliest high school
shooting in America’s history. The deadliest attack by a
lone gunman in United States history occurred at Virginia
Tech in 2007, which left 33 dead and another 25 injured. In
2012, Oakland, California was riddled with tragedy in,
where seven were killed and 3 were injured in a pseudo-
firing squad manner. In the same year, Newton, Con-
necticut had 28 elementary school children and staff were
murdered by a 20-year old. In Santa Monica, California in
& Rhonda K. Lewis [email protected]
Jamie LoCurto
Kyrah Brown
David Stowell
J’Vonnah Maryman
Amber Dean
Thoi McNair
Debbie Ojeda
Julia Siwierka
1 Wichita State University, 1845 N. Fairmount,
Box 34, Wichita, KS 67260, USA
2 Sedgwick County Health Department, 1900 E. 9th Street,
Wichita, KS 67214, USA
123
J Community Health (2016) 41:482–487
DOI 10.1007/s10900-015-0118-x
2013, another six were killed and four others were woun-
ded. A year later, UC had a shooting that left six dead and
seven others affected. The most recent campus shooting
was in Umpqua Community College, Oregon in 2015,
which ended with ten deaths and nine injured.
There have been at least 136 school shootings since the
Sandy Hook tragedy in December 2012, an average of
about one shooting a week, which is indicative of the fact
that 77 % of violent deaths in schools from 1992 to 2001
resulted from gun violence. These numbers help to convey
the urgency and gravity with which community and policy
makers work to keep college students safe [2]. Because
these incidents have occurred on college campuses and the
perpetrators have been college- aged students, it is
important to understand college students’ perspectives on
the topic of gun control to aid in learning about the causes
of gun violence and help create solutions to eliminate these
tragic events from re-occurring. A number of studies have
been conducted that have gathered the opinions from fac-
ulty [3] and even from campus police chiefs’ perceptions
and practices [4], however it is imperative to gather the
opinions of the population that has been closely affected by
the problem: college students.
Since 1996 Congress had restricted researchers from
conducting any research related to gun control issues [5].
A Congressional Research Service report ‘‘estimates that
547 people have died in public mass shootings over the
past 30 years, 19,766 died from gun-related suicides in
2011 alone’’ [6] as cited in APA’s special report on Gun
Violence. According to the Federal Bureau of Investiga-
tions and the University of Texas there has been a spike in
the rate of mass shootings between 2007 and 2013 from
16.4 shootings compared to 6.4 shootings during the years
2000–2006. Thus, a paradigm shift is needed in this
country to address this issue [7].
Several studies have addressed college students’ atti-
tudes toward guns and school safety. A national study
conducted in 2002 by Miller et al. [8] surveyed 119, 4-year
colleges to determine how students who had a firearm
differed from those who did not have a firearm. The results
indicated that students who reported having firearms at
college were more likely to report engaging in risky
behaviors than those who did not own a gun. Although this
study illustrated an association between risky behaviors
and gun ownership, it did not present any solutions con-
cerning how to reduce campus gun violence or how to
make college campuses safer places for students to live.
Other researchers, such as Cavanaugh et al. [9] exam-
ined students’ attitudes about carrying concealed weapons
at two universities. Their findings suggest that the majority
of students were not comfortable with having concealed
guns on campus. Thompson et al. [10] also conducted a
study related to students’ perceptions and practices
regarding carrying concealed handguns on university
campuses. They found that the majority (76 %) of the
students were not supportive of having a concealed hand-
gun on campus, nor did they want to obtain a permit to
have a handgun (78 %). The literature clearly indicates that
college students across the country who were surveyed
from multiple campuses were not comfortable with policies
supporting the carrying of concealed guns on their
campuses.
The focus of our study was to gather college students’
attitudes toward guns, and to ascertain whether they feel
there should be stricter security precautions on college
campuses and whether the United States government is
doing enough to address gun violence in this country and
how this differed for males and females and by ethnicity.
Furthermore, we were also interested in looking at their
opinions on how the United States government is doing to
address gun violence in this country. It is important to
understand college students’ perspectives on this issue in
order to influence policies for the future.
Method
Participants and Setting
The participants in this study were 419 college students
ages 18–59, M = 25 attending a large, Midwestern
University. The university has approximately 15,000 stu-
dents enrolled on the campus and is considered a commuter
campus. Fifty-six percent of sample identified as female
and 43 % of sample identified as male, one person iden-
tified as transgender. Table 1 highlights other demographic
variables of the sample.
Procedure
The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board
at Wichita State University. A random sample of 1400
undergraduate students was selected to participate in this
study. Four hundred and nineteen students responded to the
survey which represented a 30 % response rate. Partici-
pants were sent the online survey with a consent form.
Participants would complete the consent form and they
were given the opportunity to receive an email copy of the
consent form and then they could proceed with the survey.
If they did not want to participate in the survey they could
respond with a no and they would be sent to the end of the
survey. For those who wanted to complete the survey: they
proceeded. At the end of the survey, they were asked if
they were willing to enter a drawing for a $75 gift card to
the University’s bookstore as an incentive for completing
the survey.
J Community Health (2016) 41:482–487 483
123
Instrumentation
The survey used in the study consisted of 52 questions and
included basic demographic questions, questions about
media preferences, attitudes about gun laws, social media
use, mental illness, attitudes about guns and preventing gun
violence. Questions that will be analyzed in this study are
outlined in Table 2.
Results
Figure 1 describes the overall percentages. Fifty-four per-
cent of the respondents agree that the purchase of military
assault weapons should be banned. They also agree that
teachers and professors should be allowed to carry regis-
tered handguns to school and to the university 53 and 57 %
respectively. In regards to security precautions 73 %
thought there should be more security precautions at K-12
schools and 65 % thought there should be more security
precautions on university campuses. Fifty-six percent did
not believe the United States was doing enough to address
the gun control issue.
Table 3 shows the differences in beliefs between the
genders. A logic regression was performed to determined
how males and females differed on their beliefs regarding
beliefs on the purchase of military style assault weapons,
beliefs about what the United States was doing to address
the issue, and whether teachers and professors should carry
registered guns on campus. Two variables emerged that
were statistically significant. Females were 1.9 times more
likely to believe that the purchase of military style assault
weapons and high capacity magazines should be banned
compared to their male counterparts (p = 004).
On the other hand, females were 1.55 times more likely
to believe that teachers should be allowed to carry regis-
tered handguns on school grounds (K-12) compared to their
males counterparts (p = .046).
No statistically significant differences were found in
how males and females thought the United States was
addressing the problem of gun violence or whether a pro-
fessor should carry a registered handgun to a university.
Ethnic Minority Differences
There were no statistically significant differences on any of
the gun-related questions between the ethnic minority
groups. The Ethnic minority groups consisted of African
Americans, Hispanic/Latino, Asian Americans and Native
American students who attended this school in the Midwest
compared to their Caucasian counterparts. There were no
statistically significant differences in how they felt about
assault weapons, whether teachers or professors should be
allowed to carry registered handguns on school grounds, or
whether the United States was doing enough to address the
issue of gun violence.
Top Concerns that Contribute to Gun Violence
Participants were asked to rank their top three concerns that
they thought were contributing to gun violence. Four
concerns emerging
1. Decline in parenting and family values 17 %,
2. Gang involvement 14 %,
3. Bullying (ex, cyber bullying, physical bullying)
13.8 %,
4. Guns are easy to obtain 13.8 %.
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to gather college student’s
opinions on gun violence, if they believe there should be
stricter security precautions on college campuses, and if
they believe the United States government is doing enough
Table 1 Demographics of survey participants
Percentage Number
Gender
Male 42 145
Female 56 193
Transgender 1 1
Race/ethnicity
Black/African American 5 16
Caucasian/White 72 244
Hispanic/Latino 6 20
Asian American 4 15
Multi-racial 6 20
Other 7 25
Political affiliation
Democratic party 19 65
Republican party 25 86
Independent 10 33
Other (tea, libertarian party) 11 38
I do not identify with any political group 30 101
I prefer not to disclose 5 17
Marital status
Single/never married 69 235
Married 22 75
Divorced 4 12
Separated 1 2
Widowed 2 1
Living with domestic partner 4 14
484 J Community Health (2016) 41:482–487
123
to address gun violence in this country. This study is in line
with other studies that have gathered student’s opinions.
Overwhelmingly students do want teachers or professors
carrying guns to school which was in contrast to what was
found by Cavanaugh et al. [9]. These other studies however
did not examine the opinions of college students and how
the views differed by gender or race and ethnicity. Our
world is changing and as our nation becomes more and
more diverse, the strategies that we develop must align
with that diversity. The Now is the Time document
developed by President Obama has a number of strategies
to address school shootings and violence [5]. Limiting
assault weapons and having more access to mental health
services for individuals in need is an important component
of the document. In our study a number of top concerns
emerged. Although these are opinions and perceptions,
sometimes perceptions can be a reality for people. The
participants’ top concerns include the decline in parenting
values, gang involvement, bullying and guns are easy to
obtain. These issues will need to be addressed before
additional gun violence and social policies are developed.
The major findings of this opinion survey is that there
was not consensus on how to address the issue. First, sur-
prisingly males and females differed on how to combat the
issue. Second, males were more likely to strongly disagree
not to ban assault weapons which was expected. Third,
females agreed that teachers should carry a gun to school.
It is not clear why females would respond this way. Per-
haps for safety reasons female college students are saying it
Table 2 List of questions used in this study
Questions
I believe the purchase of military style assault weapons and high capacity magazines shall be banned
Strongly disagree to strongly agree
I believe that school teachers should be allowed to carry registered handguns on school (K-12) campuses)
Strongly disagree to strongly agree
I believe that professors should be allowed to carry registered handguns on university campuses
Strongly disagree to strongly agree
I believe that security precautions (metal detectors, random searches, drills) on school (K-12) campuses should be stricter
Strongly disagree to strongly agree
I believe security precautions (e.g. metal detectors, random searches, drills) on university campuses should be stricter
Strongly disagree to strongly agree
I believe that the United States government is doing enough to address the issue of gun violence
Strongly disagree to strongly agree
Please rank what you believe to be the top three factors that contribute to gun violence in the United States
Pop Culture influence (e.g. violent movies, video games)
Bullying (e.g. physical bullying, cyber bullying)
Parole, early release, and short sentencing for violent offenders
Guns are too easy to obtain
Poor identification and treatment of people with mental illness
Decline in parenting and family values
Economic factors/income inequality
Repeat exposure to violence in home or community
Lack of coping/stress management skills among individuals
Gang involvement
56
35
27
43
47
46
44
65
73
57
53
54
0 20 40 60 80 100
Believe that United States government is doing enough to address the issue of
gun violence.
Believe security precau�ons on university should be stricter.
Believe that secruity precau�ons on school campuses should be stricter.
Professors should be allowed to carry registered handguns on campuses
Believe school teachers should be allowed to carry registered handguns on
campuses
Believe the purchase of military style assault weapons should be banned
Agree
Disagree
Fig. 1 Percentage of responses to gun control questions
J Community Health (2016) 41:482–487 485
123
is okay for teachers to carry a gun on school grounds.
Although in the state (where the study was conducted)
concealed guns are permitted, guns are not permitted on
K-12 school grounds or on college campuses. Recently,
Kansas passed a law to permit concealed weapons on
campus beginning July 1, 2017 [11]. Thus, it appears
education about gun laws are needed and we do need to
focus on making our college campuses safer for all students
and changing policies that make our citizens safe. There
has yet to be an intervention that would increase the
knowledge on gun violence awareness on campuses. Per-
haps addressing the myths about guns would dispel myths
about gun ownership among educators. Fifth, females also
strongly disagreed with the statement that security pre-
cautions on college campus should be stricter. The premise
behind these questions is to prevent gun violence through
safety precautions like metal detectors, random searches,
and drills. There is a possibility that the description of
security checkpoints on campus were not appealing to
females who have purses and backpacks. The idea of going
through a search may have been unattractive to female
students.
Another major finding is that bullying emerged as an
issue that needs to be included in the political discourse
about gun violence. Although, the Obama Administration
has a plan, the plan does not include bullying as a strategic
issue to curb school shooting as a potential root cause of
the violence. Gang involvement was another issue that
emerged that needed to be addressed. None of the perpe-
trators that were involved in mass school shootings par-
ticipated in gangs. It is not clear why gang involvement
surfaced as an issue among this population of college
students. More research and education needs to be done on
the risk and protective factors to prevent shootings in
public schools and on college campuses.
It is important to gather the opinions of a diverse student
population because it is going to take the different per-
spectives to solve this complex issue. It was surprising that
there were no statistically significant differences among the
ethnic groups about gun control issues. This may have been
due to the sample. Perhaps future studies can over sample
for ethnic groups and really understand how they feel about
gun violence and how these issues affect their communities
as well.
Limitations
A number of limitations are noted in this study. First,
although we had a very diverse sample the number of
ethnically diverse groups actually participating in the study
was small. The overwhelming majority of the sample was
Caucasian and this may have influenced the results in some
way. However the demographics were a true reflection of
the campus community and the random sample that was
created was a representative sample of the campus com-
munity of Wichita State University. Second, this is only an
opinions survey and captures how people are feeling at the
moment and does not capture how they might feel
3 months from now. Lastly, perhaps students gave socially
desirable answers and did not express their true feelings
this could impact the results and how we use the infor-
mation to make informed decisions concerning policy.
Future Research
In the future it is important for researchers to design and
implement gender specific and ethnically specific inter-
ventions to address gun violence. Males and females dif-
fered on how they wanted to address gun violence. Females
wanted less restrictive safety precautions than males. In
addition to having gender specific interventions, it is
important to have qualitative and quantitative approaches
in order to understand how and why the respondents
answered the questions the way they did. Future research
should include interviews and focus groups with males and
females and have focus groups across all of the ethnic
groups to better understand how they view gun violence in
this country and generate solutions to the problem. In the
future it is important to interview and survey faculty and
staff on college campus to see how their views differ from
Table 3 Beliefs by gender (N = 419)
Dependent variable B Odds
ratio
95 % CI p value
I believe that purchase of military style assault weapons and high capacity magazines should be
banned
.645 1.907 1.232–2.950 .004*
I believe that the United States government is doing enough to address the issue of gun violence -.088 .915 .512–1.414 .690
I believe that school teachers should be allowed to carry registered handguns on school (K-12) -.442 1.555 1.007–2.402 .046*
I believe that professors should be allowed to carry registered handgun on university campuses .358 1.430 .922–2.217 .110
* p \ .005
486 J Community Health (2016) 41:482–487
123
college students and what they believe are the root causes
of the problem. An honest and open dialogue is what is
needed in this country.
Taken together, the opinions of college students can
serve as a starting point in the dialogue of what to do
towards the enactment of laws and the development of
public policy to help curb gun violence on college cam-
puses. Over 547 deaths have occurred over the last
30 years. How many more people will have to die before
political and social action focuses on a variety of issues like
bullying, misunderstanding individuals with mental illness
and gang involvement?
References
1. Miller, M., Hemenway, D., & Wechsler, H. (1999). Guns at
college. Journal of American College, 48, 7–12.
2. Birnbaum, R. (2013). Ready, fire, aim: The college campus gun
fight. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 45, 6–14.
3. Bennett, K., Kraft, J., & Grubb, D. (2012). University faculty
attitudes toward guns on campus. Journal of Criminal Justice and
Education, 23, 336–355.
4. Thompson, A., Price, J., Mrdjenovich, A., & Khubchandani, J.
(2009). Reducing firearm-related violence on college campuses—
Police chiefs’ perceptions and practices. Journal of American
College Health, 58, 247–254.
5. Now is the Time. (2013). The president’s plan to protect our
children and our communities by reducing gun violence.
WH.Gov/Now-is-the-Time.
6. Miller, A. (2014). Stop gun violence: APA’s new policy resolu-
tion encourages a comprehensive approach to gun violence pre-
vention. APA Monitor, 45, 64–65.
7. Blair, J., & Schweit, K. (2014). A study of active shooter inci-
dents in the united states between 2000–2013. Texas State
University and Federal Bureau of Investigation. Washington,
DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice.
8. Miller, M., Hemenway, D., & Wechsler, H. (2002). Guns and gun
threats at college. Journal of American College Health, 51,
57–65.
9. Cavanaugh, M., Bouffard, J., Wells, W., & Nobles, M. (2012).
Student attitudes toward concealed handguns on campus at 2
universities. American Journal of Public Health, 102,
2245–2247.
10. Thompson, A., Price, J., Dake, J., Teeple, K., Bassler, S.,
Khubchandani, J., et al. (2013). Student perceptions and practices
regarding carrying concealed handguns on university campuses.
Journal of American College Health, 61, 243–253.
11. Lefler, D. (2015). Kansas regents preparing to open universities to
guns. The Wichita Eagle. pp. A1, P1.
J Community Health (2016) 41:482–487 487
123
- College Students Opinions on Gun Violence
- Abstract
- Introduction
- Method
- Participants and Setting
- Procedure
- Instrumentation
- Results
- Ethnic Minority Differences
- Top Concerns that Contribute to Gun Violence
- Discussion
- Limitations
- Future Research
- References