Costs and Collaboration
4/10/13 Collaboration in the Supply Chain: Getting Things Done Beyond the Four Walls - Article from Supply Chain Management Review
www.scmr.com/article/collaboration_in_the_supply_chain_getting_things_done_beyond_the_four_walls 1/4
Logistics Management Modern Materials Handling
Your em ail address
From the March-April 2013 issue
Inventory Optimization: Evolving from Fad to Necessity
There is broad agreement that inventory should be optimized to properly match demand. Yet achieving this continues to prove difficult for many companies. The insight and best practices offered here will help you understand the importance of sound inventory practices and put your inventory optimization initiative on a success track.
The Case for Managing MRO Inventory
Taking a Broader View of Supply Chain Resilience
How to Communicate with Your Board of Directors
A Practitioner’s Guide to Demand Planning
More from this issue
Subscribe to our free, weekly email newsletter!
Latest White Paper
What’s Next after Nextel Push-To- Talk for Fleets? - FREE White Paper
Motorola's digital two-way radios are the ideal way to reach drivers any time and know where they are all the time. You get the same push-to-talk services
at a lower cost and the flexibility to choose the right radio for each driver.
View more white papers
Latest Webcast
7 Steps to Better Inventory Management
Effectively managing your inventory —
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook or RSS | | More
The series is titled “Supply Chain Management: Beyond the
Basics” and a new installment w ill appear each w eek on our
w ebsite. It picks up w here our original series of articles f rom
Tennessee—the “Basics of Supply Chain Management” — lef t of f . Among the topics w e’ll be covering in this latest
series are successf ul collaboration, supply chain risk
management, strategic sourcing, supply chain f inance, and
more.
Collaboration in the Supply Chain: Getting Things Done Beyond the Four W alls Part 3 of our series on “Supply Chain Management: Beyond the Basics” examines the challenges and potential benefits associated with supply chain collaboration. Professor Chad Autry of the University of Tennessee explains why and when collaboration makes sense. He also points out the warning signs to watch for that signal a supply chain partnership may be in trouble.
By Dr. Chad W. Autry, Associate
Professor of Logistics The University of
Tennessee
May 03, 2011
Collaboration among supply chain
partners is certainly a hot topic, but many
supply chain managers remain unsure of
what the concept of collaboration really
entails. To some companies,
collaboration simply means an exchange
of ideas and information among partners
– usually directed toward a specific
opportunity or problem – where members
of the collaborating companies get
together to share best practices, address
concerns, and generate solutions.
For example, one pet products
manufacturer stages monthly meetings
with its key transportation providers in
order to discuss rates and fuel market
concerns, talk about capacity issues, and
share demand data and projections for a
few critical SKUs for broad-level planning
purposes. We can refer to this type of loose collaborative relationship as a
“conventional” or weak collaboration, and it carries with it only moderate levels of
potential risk and reward for the partners involved.
However, for other companies, collaboration may mean something greater and/or
different. Companies that have migrated further down the evolutionary chain of
collaboration tend to view it more in terms of a long-term strategic venture, intended to
allow partners to synthesize planning; decision-making; and execution on an open-
ended, open-subject basis— keeping each other’s desired outcomes in mind
throughout. In this latter type of arrangement, which we can refer to as a “vested” or
strong collaboration, the key is that both sides have generally put some “skin in the
game” – the risks and rewards of the collaborative venture are both real and shared.
Examples of strong collaborations would include synchronizing a manufacturer’s
product development and marketing functions with its partner’s packaging and
distribution capabilities; joint forecasting and inventory planning among multiple
Access Prem ium PLUS+ Content. Log in Now or Begin Your PLUS+ Subscription
News Critical Topics Guides Blogs White Papers Webcasts Subscribe
ShareShareShareShareMore
4/10/13 Collaboration in the Supply Chain: Getting Things Done Beyond the Four Walls - Article from Supply Chain Management Review
www.scmr.com/article/collaboration_in_the_supply_chain_getting_things_done_beyond_the_four_walls 2/4
whether it’s at rest in a warehouse or in the supply chain pipeline — is a critical factor in business success today. Join us for this special webcast as inventory
expert, Paul Huppertz, Partner at The Progress Group, highlights steps companies can take to improve their inventory performance and reap the benefits.
View more webcasts
From the Institute for Supply Management
ISM’s December 2012 Semiannual Economic Forecast Posts Positive Numbers
While there were few surprises contained in ISM’s December 2012 Semiannual Economic Forecast, the overall findings suggest growth in the United States will continue in 2013
ISM semiannual report expects more continued economic growth for rest of 2012
Institute for Supply Management’s NMI hits highest level since January 2011
ISM November non-manufacturing report shows growth for 24th straight month
ISM October non-manufacturing report is nearly identical to September, still growing
View more from ISM
members of partner organizations to optimize total supply chain inventory; and co-
creating long-term supply chain network models with upstream suppliers and
downstream customers so as to minimize annual transportation costs for the entire
system. Additionally, the Vested Outsourcing research conducted by the University of
Tennessee provides another excellent illustration of the power of strong collaboration. In
a Vested Outsourcing relationship, companies and their third-party providers work
together very closely, keeping each other’s key process requirements and best
outcome interests in constant focus.
Depending on how your company sees a particular opportunity or threat, collaboration
can therefore be approached as either a tactical or strategic-level initiative and would
commensurately yield short or long-term, and small- or large-scale, benefits.
Strong Collaboration
In talking with companies who are sponsors of UT’s Demand and Supply Integration
Forums and during company-specific projects, I have heard managers say they are
interested in strengthening their collaboration arrangements with certain key partners in
order to more fully leverage their best relationships. Strong collaboration may be
productive in the right settings in some collaborative partnerships, but it is perhaps less
advantageous to pursue in other partner/product scenarios. In order to better
understand which collaboration arrangement is right for a given setting, it is important to
understand the potential benefits of strong collaborations, and weigh those benefits
against the potential risks of entering into such an alliance with a partner whose
interests may/may not be perfectly aligned with your own. Additionally, you should be
aware of the key factors that enable or inhibit productive, collaborative arrangements so
that steps can be taken to leverage or mitigate their effects.
To weigh the collaboration decision effectively, we must first gain some sense of what a
strong collaboration arrangement entails. Much research has begun to explore this
issue, and luckily there is some consensus. Most investigators agree that the close,
highly productive collaborative arrangements we denote as strong or “vested” have at
least three characteristics in common: 1) deep, intensive communication among the
partners, 2) open and free information sharing, and 3) some form of joint planning,
including mutually shared goals and dually aligned incentives with which to reach them.
Open communication, information sharing, and joint planning represent the lifeblood of
any strong collaboration arrangement, and a venture would almost certainly fail without
them. These measures are supported by alignment of incentives across the partnering
organizations, which ensures that the developed plans are adhered to and that the
resulting work actually gets done. Additionally, variations of strong interfirm
collaboration may include several other aspects that are believed to generate
additional positive outcomes for the partners. Depending on the specific setting, these
may include processes that enable joint problem solving; knowledge-creation routines
or “think tanks”; decision-making heuristics designed to align the partners’ approaches
to opportunity development or risk management; and resource-sharing mechanisms
that allow each company to take best advantage of the other’s talent, assets, and
ideas.
Each of these may look different from context to context, and may be more or less
relevant depending on the situation, but variations of these themes frequently occur in
many strong collaboration arrangements. On the flip side, as collaborations among
companies increase in strength, their benefits are to some degree balanced out by
certain risks – sharing of proprietary customer or supplier information with partners or
divulging trade secrets each present unique dangers, for example – and so companies
are wise to consider such tradeoffs before entering into any form of collaborative
agreement. In addition, some firms may be wary of involving outsiders in key decisions
where both the motivations and underlying agendas for undertaking certain strategic
supply chain actions are less than fully transparent.
Enablers and Inhibitors of Effective Supply Chain Collaboration
Despite the best efforts of supply chain managers, only some collaborative ventures
among companies end up working out for the participants’ mutual benefit. During a
recent interview with a well-known paper products manufacturer, one manager asked
us what the differences are between collaboration opportunities that work and others
that seem destined to fail from the outset. Knowing little or nothing about a particular
situation, it would be hard to say with precision what the critical success factors would
4/10/13 Collaboration in the Supply Chain: Getting Things Done Beyond the Four Walls - Article from Supply Chain Management Review
www.scmr.com/article/collaboration_in_the_supply_chain_getting_things_done_beyond_the_four_walls 3/4
be in any given setting, but we can make some generalizations as to typical enablers
and barriers to collaboration success. I will conclude by addressing three primary
factors in each category that are supported by the current research.
In terms of factors that have been demonstrated as enabling strong interfirm
collaboration efforts, it is imperative that we understand that above all (and despite
what some believe), collaborative ventures are primarily dependent on personalities,
knowledge, and skills of the people from the involved companies. Accordingly, the
collaborative venture must involve persons with leadership skills and must be
characterized by trust among the members of the participating companies.
Because collaboration outside the four walls will necessarily involve extra effort and
resources, both sides will need an internal champion to maximize their returns on the
relationship. Additionally, it is crucial that the members of the collaborating firms trust
each other – perhaps not fully, but enough that the information critical to the venture can
be exchanged with full openness. Until full and free information exchange can occur, the
product of the collaboration will only be a shell of its full potential.
Furthermore, because much of modern collaboration among geographically separated
firms takes place in virtual space, a third key enabler is usually the implementation of an
adequate technological collaboration tool. It may not be necessary to adopt the most
sophisticated technology available for this purpose, and the exact functionality will of
course be context-dependent, but most every successful strong collaboration will
include an electronic workspace for the transmission and sharing of the key data, work,
and ideas. A number of other enablers have been cited as well and are variably
appropriate for consideration depending on the product/partner context.
Of course, in addition to the enablers, a number of factors have been shown to inhibit or
reduce the overall effectiveness of a strong interfirm collaboration arrangement. Again,
these are generally related to the human element of the collaborative venture. First, it
should be widely apparent that insufficient communication among the members of the
collaborating companies would spell trouble for the entire venture. Sometimes, the
collaborative effort starts off with the best of intentions, but, given that partners may be
non-local, members of the initiative might communicate less and less throughout the
venture’s life as more immediate and local issues become more pressing. In other
cases, there are outright betrayals of trust that occur either intentionally or inadvertently.
Obviously, such actions would spell doom for the relationship. One way to manage
these sorts of human issues would be to formalize the terms of the relationship upfront,
and then relax them as the relationship matures to a point where it can be governed by
trust. A third reason frequently cited as a cause for collaboration failure is simply
resistance to change in the individual organizations.
In spite of these issues, some companies are finding that a very productive way to
address complex supply chain issues is through the development of strong
collaborative arrangements with key partners. Though collaboration has been a supply
chain mantra for over a decade, many companies have yet to figure out how to do it
well. Exploring the possibilities presented here with your most important partners may
lead to a differential advantage for your supply chain in the foreseeable future.
Editorial Note:
This series is titled “Supply Chain Management: Beyond the Basics” and a new
installment will appear each week on our website. It picks up where our original series
of articles from Tennessee—the “Basics of Supply Chain Management” — left off.
Among the topics we’ll be covering in this latest series are successful collaboration,
supply chain risk management, strategic sourcing, supply chain finance, and more.
To be notified of all the latest Supply Chain Management Review editorial information
and updates, including this series “Supply Chain Management: Beyond the Basics”
make sure you are on our eNewsletter subscriber list.
About the Author
Dr. Chad W. Autry Associate Professor of Logistics The University of Tennessee Chad W. Autry, Ph.D. is an associate professor of logistics in the College of Business Adm inistration at the University of Tennessee, Knoxville. He holds a Ph.D. in Business Adm inistration, supply chain
4/10/13 Collaboration in the Supply Chain: Getting Things Done Beyond the Four Walls - Article from Supply Chain Management Review
www.scmr.com/article/collaboration_in_the_supply_chain_getting_things_done_beyond_the_four_walls 4/4
m anagem ent focus, from the University of Oklahom a. Autry has worked with m any organizations related to supply chain process im provem ent, including Boise Corp, IBM, Goodwill Industries, the Am erican Red Cross, the U.S. Air Force, and the U.S. Marine Corps. He is a m em ber of the Education Strategies Com m ittee of the Council of Supply Chain Managem ent Professionals; has assum ed active leadership roles with WERC, Production and Operations Managem ent Society, ISM, National Association of Purchasing Managers; and is a co-founder of the Supply Chain Managem ent and Industrial Distribution Sym posium . His has authored over 40 articles in academ ic and professional publications about logistics and supply chain relationship-based collaboration and network design.
Subscribe to Supply Chain Management Review magazine
Subscribe today. Don't miss out!
Get in-depth coverage from industry experts with proven techniques for cutting supply chain costs and case studies in supply chain best practices.
Start Your Subscription Today!
Recent Entries
Labor peace arrives for East and Gulf Coast ports
ILA membership signs off on six-year Master Contract with USMX.
Procurement Innovation Gains Traction
The Hackett Group's study found that procurement leaders expect their budgets to decline by 0.4 percent in 2013.
The Hackett Group Shares New Trends in Procurement
Procurement leaders face new pressures in 2013 as companies focus on profitable growth and balance local agility with global scale in their value chains, according to new Procurement Key Issues Research from The Hackett Group, Inc.
Supply Chain & The Food Safety Process
The TÜV SÜD Safety Gauge has found that escalating consumer demand coupled with substantial annual recall costs mean that investing in enhanced product safety can improve consumer well-being and drive commercial success at the same time.
Procurement Value is Not a Cheap Proposition
According to a new survey by Consero Group, an international consultancy based in Bethesda, Md, over 50 percent of Chief Procurement Officers said their company pursues short-term savings from suppliers that undermine long-term value.
Article Topics
· Supply Chain Management: Beyond the Basics · Demand and Supply
Integration · All topics
0 Comments
Post a comment
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
FREE subscriptions - Sign up for more magazines & newsletters from Peerless Media
Supply Chain Resource Store - Access research, books, back issues and more!
Subscribe to Supply Chain Management Review - 7 issues per year, exclusive access to digital archives
Subscribe to Magazine Subscribe to Newsletters Advertise Contacts About Us RSS Feeds Reprints Privacy
Peerless Media Network
Modern Materials Handling Logistics Managem ent Supply Chain Managem ent Review Subscribe to Magazines and Newsletters
© Copyright 2012 Peerless Media LLC , a division of EH Publishing, Inc • 111 Speen Street, Ste 200, Fram ingham , MA 01701 USA