Week Three Coalition Testimony Individual Presentation 8-12 SLIDES

Levels of Achievement

Criteria

Proficient

Competent

Novice

Needs Improvement

Coalition description, coordination/consistency in messaging, coalition members mission/goals description 

Weight 15.00%

90.0 o 100.00 %

· Name of coalition and clear statement of member organization being represented.

· Description of the coalition mission and goals is complete, and includes all aspects highlighted on the coalition web page.

· Description of the member organization goals/mission are thorough and clear.

· How the organization can contribute to the selected policy is explicitly and thoroughly described.

· Presentation demonstrates very clear understanding of the policy, issue, and testimony development

· No more than 2 slides to include this information

80.00 to 89.00 %

· Name of coalition and clear statement of member organization being represented.

· Description of the coalition mission and goals is mostly complete, and includes most all aspects highlighted on the coalition web page.

· Description of the member organization goals/mission are mostly clear, but added details are needed.

· How the organization can contribute to the selected policy is somewhat described.

· Presentation demonstrates clear understanding of the policy, issue, and testimony development.

· Overall, added description is needed.

· More than 2 slides to include this information

65.00 to 79.00 %

· Name of coalition statement of member organization included, but may not be representative of what is stated on coalition webpage.

· Description of the coalition mission and goals is somewhat complete, and includes some of the aspects highlighted on the coalition web page.

· Description of the member organization goals/mission are vague.

· How the organization can contribute to the selected policy is vaguely described.

· Presentation shows difficulty demonstrating the policy, issue, and testimony development.

· More than 2 slides to include this information

0.00 to 65.00 %

· Name of coalition and statement of coalition member organization is not complete.

· Description of the coalition mission and goals is not complete, and is missing most of the aspects highlighted on the coalition web page.

· Description of the member organization goals/mission are not included.

· Some descriptions may be missing.

· How the organization can contribute to the selected policy is vaguely described and/or may be missing.

· Presentation demonstrates an inability to describe the policy, issue, and testimony development.

Time efficiency and requirement 

Weight 15.00%

90.00 to 100.00 %

· Testimony meets the three-minute time limit.

· Testimony maximizes the time for messaging.

· Each point is well – connected and makes a strong case

80.00 to 89.00 %

· Testimony is 30 seconds longer or shorter than three-minutes or makes a weak case.

65.00 to 79.00 %

· Testimony is inadequate to make a case

· Testimony is far over or under time (> that 30 seconds)

0.00 to 65.00 %

· Missing testimony

Meta-Core messages / Ask 

Weight 15.00%

90.00 to 100.00 %

· Messages and the “ask” are strongly stated, clear and concise, and consistent with the problem statement and policy advocacy.

· The testimony clearly emphasizes all the key points of the public health problem

80.00 to 89.00 %

· Messages and the “ask” are clear or somewhat consistent with the problem statement and policy advocacy.

· The testimony emphasizes most of the key points of the public health problem

65.00 to 79.00 %

· Messages and the “ask” are unclear and/ or inconsistent with the problem statement and policy advocacy.

· The testimony emphasizes most of the key points of the public health problem

· Many important messages are missing and there is redundancy in details and statements

0.00 to 65.00 %

· Missing

Required components of testimony 

Weight 25.00%

90.0 to 100.00 %

· All components are strong and clear

· Identification of organization represented and standing on issue is included.

· Why policy issue is important and why advocating for it is clearly described.

· Description of why this policy is a solution to the public health problem is strong and detailed.

· Ask clearly included.

· Back up statements, facts and statistics or personal experiences are explicitly included.

· A strong and complete scholarly reference is clearly included from all members.

· Thank you to the members of the hearing included from all members.

80.00 to 89.00 %

· Most components included for each member, but some may be unclear or weak.

· Identification of organization represented and their standing is included from members.

· Why policy issue is important and why advocating for it is included.

· Description of why this policy is a solution to the public health problem has some weaknesses and needs more detail.

· Ask could use additional clarity.

· Back up statements, facts and statistics or personal experiences are included, but need additional clarity.

· A partially complete scholarly reference is included from most all members.

· Thank you to the members of the hearing is included from some of the members.

65.00 to 79.00 %

· Many components are missing for each member. Or many portions are unclear or weak.

· Identification of organization represented and their standing is not clearly stated from one or more members.

· Why policy issue is important and why advocating is weakly included.

· The ask and description of why this policy is a solution to the public health problem has many weaknesses.

· Back up statements, facts and statistics or personal experiences are not clearly included.

· An incomplete scholarly reference is included from most all members or not at all.

· Thank you to the members of the hearing is not clearly included. Required components are missing from one member’s testimony.

0.00 to 65.00 %

· Missing more than one member’s contribution.

Key Summarized Aspects of Public Health Problem 

Weight 20.00%

90.00 to 100.00 %

Four key summarized aspects of the public health problem are clearly and thoroughly included using data and statistics:

1) what is the issue,

2) who is affected,

3) economic impact

and

4) The policy solution is explicitly included and explained.

· Appropriate bill numbers and descriptions are clearly explained.

· No more than four slides for the summary of the coalition proposal portion.

80.00 to 89.00 %

· Three key summarized aspects of the public health problem proposal problem steps (what is the issue, who is affected, economic impact) are included, using data and statistics, but more explanation and description are needed.

· The policy solution is included but more explanation is needed.

· Appropriate bill numbers and descriptions are included, but somewhat unclear.

· More than four slides are included in the summary of the coalition proposal portion.

65.00 to 79.00 %

· More than one key summarized aspects of the public health problem (what is the issue, who is affected, economic impact) are missing and additional data, statistics and description are needed.

· The policy solution is not clearly included.

· More than four slides included for the proposal summary portion of the presentation or the information is incomplete.

0.00 to 65.00 %

· One or more aspects are not included in the presentation. List of members is not included.

APA Citations and References 

Weight 3.00%

90.00 to 100.00 %

· APA style in-text citations used throughout document with no errors.

· APA reference page contains at least three reliable or scholarly sources and has no formatting errors.

80.00 to 89.00 %

· APA style in-text citations used throughout document with minor errors.

· APA reference page contains three reliable or scholarly sources but has minor formatting errors.

65.00 to 79.00 %

· APA style in-text citations with major errors and the references page contains less than three sources, and/or has major formatting errors.

0.00 to 65.00 %

· Missing citations or 2 or more references or all references are not in APA style.

Timeliness 

Weight 2.00%

90.00 to 100.00 %

Presentation is submitted by the due date and time.

80.00 to 89.00 %

Presentation is submitted less than 24 hours past the due date and time.

65.00 to 79.00 %

Presentation is submitted more than 24 hours past the due date and time

0.00 to 64.00 %

Presentation is submitted 48 hours past the due date and time.

Presentation Appearance; Speaking Style

Weight 5.00%

90.00 to 100.00 %

· Appropriate amount of text on slides.

· Content is clearly and accurately presented.

· Slides are appropriate for an academic or professional setting (e.g., contrast, terminology, graphics).

· Speaker can be clearly heard while presenting.

80.00 to 89.00 %

· Content is somewhat clearly and accurately presented.

· Slides are appropriate for an academic or professional setting (e.g., contrast, terminology, graphics), some improvement is needed.

· Speaker can be heard, but there are some audio issues while presenting.

65.00 to 79.00 %

· Content is lacking clarity and accurate presentation.

· Slides are not exactly appropriate for an academic or professional setting (e.g., contrast, terminology, graphics), some improvement is needed.

· It is difficult to hear the speaker and/or there are some audio issues while presenting.

0.00 to 64.00 %

· Inappropriate amount of text on slides.

· Content not used mostly for reading.

· Slides were not appropriate for an academic or professional setting (e.g., contrast, terminology, graphics).

· Some glaring audio issues are prevalent.