SMGT 620 - Coaching Philosophy Paper: Final Assignment

profilechiefseven2003
CoachingPhilosophyPaper-FinalGradingRubric.pdf

Criteria Ratings Points

Content 60 to >54.0 pts

Advanced

The content of the paper demonstrates thoughtful analysis of the student’s personal philosophy supported by personal experience and class readings/assignments.

54 to >49.0 pts

Proficient

The content of the paper demonstrates an analysis of the student’s personal philosophy and is generally supported by personal experience and class readings/assignments; however, some areas could have been more developed.

49 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The content of the paper demonstrates vague and incomplete analysis of the student’s personal philosophy; there is little support given in the form of personal experience and/or class readings/assignments.

0 pts

Not Present

60 pts

Coaching Practice

40 to >36.0 pts

Advanced

There is a thorough perspective present regarding how the student’s coaching philosophy will inform all aspects of his/her coaching practice.

36 to >33.0 pts

Proficient

There is a general perspective present regarding how the student’s coaching philosophy will inform all aspects of his/her coaching practice; however, some areas could have been more developed.

33 to >0.0 pts

Developing

There is a vague perspective present regarding how the student’s coaching philosophy will inform all aspects of his/her coaching practice.

0 pts

Not Present

40 pts

Biblical Worldview

40 to >36.0 pts

Advanced

A biblical worldview regarding how the student’s coaching philosophy will integrate with the student’s convictions is included.

36 to >33.0 pts

Proficient

A biblical worldview regarding how the student’s coaching philosophy will integrate with the student’s convictions is included; however, this could have been more developed and/or there are some gaps in logic.

33 to >0.0 pts

Developing

A biblical worldview regarding how the student’s coaching philosophy will integrate with the student’s convictions is included; however, this section is vague and/or there are several gaps in logic.

0 pts

Not Present

40 pts

Current APA Format

20 to >17.0 pts

Advanced

• Current APA guidelines are followed.

17 to >16.0 pts

Proficient

• Current APA guidelines are followed with few errors.

16 to >0.0 pts

Developing

• Current APA guidelines followed with frequent errors or not followed.

0 pts

Not Present

20 pts

Coaching Philosophy Paper: Final Grading Rubric | SMGT621_B01_202130

Criteria Ratings Points

Spelling and Grammar

20 to >17.0 pts

Advanced

Assignment is well-written with correct word choices, good phrasing, few grammatical errors, and few spelling errors.

17 to >16.0 pts

Proficient

Assignment is well-written with only a few errors with word choice, phrasing, grammar, and/or spelling; errors do not distract or detract from the overall meaning.

16 to >0.0 pts

Developing

The assignment is poorly written. There are numerous errors with word choices, phrasing, grammar, and/or spelling; errors distract and detract from the overall meaning.

0 pts

Not Present

20 pts

Page Length and References

20 to >17.0 pts

Advanced

• The assignment is 10–15 pages. A minimum of 10 peer-reviewed references are used in addition to the course textbooks and the Bible.

17 to >16.0 pts

Proficient

• The assignment is 8–9 pages and/or a total of 8–9 peer-reviewed references are used in addition to the course textbooks and the Bible.

16 to >0.0 pts

Developing

• The assignment is 5–7 pages and/or a total of 5–7 peer-reviewed references are used in addition to the course textbooks and the Bible.

0 pts

Not Present

20 pts

Total Points: 200

Coaching Philosophy Paper: Final Grading Rubric | SMGT621_B01_202130