Cybersecurity

Student Name:

Student ID:

Max

Mark

Final

Mark Comments

Not

done

Poor

(F)

Average

(P)

Good

(C)

Very Good

(D)

Excellent

(HD)

NOTE TO MARKERS:

30 0.00

Task 1 12 Task 1 Task 1

Identify the most critical components of the university's

information system - the critical information assets. 3 0

Identify critical components - x

Identify the critical components of the information system using correct methods. Provide sufficient arguments

to support the results.

Identify what threats the BYOD policy may bring to the

identified critical assets. 3 0

Identify BYOD policy threats - x

Correctly identify threats related to BYOD policy. Sufficient explanation is provided.

Identify potential vulnerabilities of each asset against the

identified threats. 3 0

Identify vulnerabilities of assets - x

Correctly identify the vulnerabilities associated with the identified assets. Sufficient explaination is provided.

Assess the risk to the university's information system. 3 0 Risk assessment - Correctly carry the risk assessment using either quantitative or qualitative risk assessment process. Document

the result correctly with sufficient explanation.

Sub Total: 0

Task 2 10 Task 2 Not

done

Poor

(F)

Average

(P)

Good

(C)

Very Good

(D)

Excellent

(HD) Task 2

Clearly explains the working principle of the certificate-

based authentication. 3 0

Explain certificate based authentication - x

The explanation is correct and captures the working principle of the certificate based authentication

mechanism.

Compare and contrast the certificate-based authentication

and password-based authentication. 3 0

Compare certificate and password authentication - x

Clearly and sufficiently shows the pros and cons of each authentication mechanism.

Correctly identify and highlight the useful features of the

certificate-based authentication for BYOD policy. 3 0

Identify features of certificate based authentication - x Correctly identify and highlight the useful features of the certificate-based authentication for BYOD policy.

Quality of references. 1 0 Quality of references -

x The reference source is correctly cited according to the citation style. The source quality is high.

Sub Total : 0

Task 3 8 Task 3 Not

done

Poor

(F)

Average

(P)

Good

(C)

Very Good

(D)

Excellent

(HD) Task 3

Correctly identify the characteristics of a Spam and

Spamming act. 2 0

Identify Spam and Spamming act - x

The Spam Act 2003 prohibits the sending of unsolicited commercial electronic messages—known as 

spam—with an Australian link. A message has an Australian link if it originates or was commissioned in 

Australia, or originates overseas but was sent to an address accessed in Australia. Students should define the

Provide three representative examples of Spams 3 0 Three examples of Spam -

x The examples are correct with sufficient explaination according to the Spam Act 2003. If no explaination is

given, half of the total mark is awarded as the maximum.

Spam handling instruction 3 0 Spam handling instruction -

x The instruction is correct, sufficient, clear, consised and takes into account to the assignment context. If

external reference is used, provide the source.

Sub Total: 0

TOTAL 30 0.00

Less late Penalty (10% per day)

No of Days 0 0.00

TOTAL (with LATE PENALTY) 0% 0.00

HD: High Distinction, D: Distinction, C:Credit, P:Pass, F:Fail

CMP71001 - Assignment 2

Grade Rubric

HD

85+

D

75+

C

65+

P

50+

F The project is incomplete and/or work well below industry standards. Functionality is poor or absent. Failure to meet project specifications. Little or no innovation. A large

volume of work would be required to bring the project up to industry standards. Insufficient effort or competence is demonstrated to achieve a passing grade.

Other Comments -

The project is realised to a very high professional standard. Technically it is fully functional and meets all specifications. It demonstrates high levels of creativity and

innovation both in terms of its function and usability. It has been carefully quality controlled to ensure full functionality and that no errors are evident.

The project is realised to a high professional standard, with a good level of functionality and meets most specifications. It demonstrates occasional levels of creativity and

innovation. While there may be a few errors, these are of a minor nature. Generally the product would be well-regarded by industry standards.

The project is realised to an acceptable professional standard with generally adequate levels of functionality and generally meets specifications, although there are a number

of problems evident. There is evidence of creativity and innovation although these are not sustained throughout. Further development could have improved this product.

Generally it would not be highly regarded by industry and would need more work before release, but still shows good developing competence.

The project was completed, but to a less than acceptable industry standard. Functionally it was problematic and some aspects did not meet required specifications. There is

little evidence of creativity or innovation in the project. Additional work would be required to bring this up to industry standards, but overall it demonstrates sufficient

competence to merit a passing grade.