ECONOMICS

profilepoorva
cm06_elasticity-tax-crossprices.pptx

Microeconomics

SUMMER SESSION

July 1, 2019

Summary (our story thus far)

June 19 – syllabus, introduction, and economic concepts

June 20 – supply, demand, market equilibrium

June 24 - shortage, surplus, market analysis

June 25 – price controls, CS & PS, math of markets

June 26 – demand elasticity, and along straight line demand curve

Outline for today

Other types of elasticity

Cross-price elasticity of demand

Substitutes and complements

Income elasticity

Elasticity matrix

Supply elasticity

Who pays the tax?

Demand elasticity, supply elasticity, and tax burden

Some math

Microeconomics

CROSS PRICE ELASTICITY, INCOME ELASTICITY, AND SUPPLY ELASTICITY

Cross Price Elasticity

Recall: Demand & Prices of Related Goods

Substitutes

Two goods that satisfy similar needs or desires. If two goods are substitutes, then demand for one rises as the price of the other rises (or the demand for one falls as the price of the other falls).

Complements

Two goods that are used jointly in consumption. If two goods are complements, then demand for one rises as the price of the other falls (or the demand for one falls as the price of the other rises).

Substitutes and complements

A good is considered a substitute if, when the price of good X increases, the quantity demanded of good Y increases. (direct/positive relationship)

↑PX  ↑QY

Coke and Pepsi; beef and chicken; butter and margarine; tea and coffee

A good is considered a complement if, when the price of good X increases, the quantity demanded of good Y decreases. (inverse/negative relationship)

↑PX  ↓QY

Strawberries and cream; bananas and pudding mix; printer and ink cartridges

Apples and Peaches Substitutes or Complements?

Apples and Peaches

Apples and Peaches are Substitutes

Cross Price Elasticity of Substitutes

Apples and Peaches are Substitutes

↑PAPPLES  ↑QPEACHES

Cross Price Elasticity of Substitutes

Apples and Peaches are Substitutes

↑PAPPLES  ↑QPEACHES

Midpoint Method:

Let i = Apples

Let j = Peaches

Substitutes: Elastic and Inelastic

Elastic Substitutes

↑Pi  ↑Qj

εij > 0

| εij | > 1

Inelastic Substitutes

↑Pi  ↑Qj

εij > 0

| εij | < 1

Apples and Peaches: Inelastic Substitutes

Suppose that when the price of apples increases 10%, the quantity demanded of peaches increases 5.46%.

Substitutes and complements

A good is considered a substitute if, when the price of good X increases, the quantity demanded of good Y increases. (direct/positive relationship)

↑PX  ↑QY

Coke and Pepsi; beef and chicken; butter and margarine; tea and coffee

A good is considered a complement if, when the price of good X increases, the quantity demanded of good Y decreases. (inverse/negative relationship)

↑PX  ↓QY

Strawberries and cream; bananas and pudding mix; printer and ink cartridges; apples and strawberries

Apples and Strawberries

Cross Price Elasticity of Complements

Apples and Strawberries are Complements

↑PAPPLES  ↓QSTRAWBERRIES

Apples & Strawberries: Elastic Complements

Suppose that when the price of apples increases 10%, the quantity demanded of strawberries decreases 12.5%.

Complements: Elastic and Inelastic

Elastic Complements

↑Pi  ↓Qj

εij < 0

| εij | > 1

Inelastic Complements

↑Pi  ↓Qj

εij < 0

| εij | < 1

Summary of Cross Price Elasticities

Substitutes

Complements

Empirical Evidence

Research shows that…

Apples and peaches: substitutes

Apples and strawberries: complements

Peaches and strawberries: substitutes

Elasticities are not symmetric

Cross-Price Elasticity Matrix

Pi \ Qj APPLE PEACH STRAWBERRY
APPLE -0.450 +0.546 -1.253
PEACH +0.157 -0.952 +0.433
STRAWBERRY -0.206 +0.249 -0.449

From: Henneberry et al. (1999) Consumer Safety Concerns and Fresh Produce Consumption. Table 5 Hicksian Demand Elasticities. J Ag Res 24:98.

URL: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/30865/1/24010098.pdf

Income Elasticity

Recall: Demand & Income

Normal Good: increased income  increased demand

Normal Good: decreased income  decreased demand

Inferior Good: increased income  decreased demand

Inferior Good: decreased income  increased demand

INCOME elasticity

Income elasticity of demand

Measures the responsiveness of the quantity demanded for one good, when the income of buyers changes

Income Elasticity Exercise (1 of 3)

When median household income in Allentown rose from $3,300 to $3,900 per month, economists found that the quantity demanded of beef filet mignon rose from 6 pounds per month to 12 pounds per month. Based on this information, the calculated income elasticity is ----- which suggests that for consumers in Allentown beef is -----.

a. 0.50; a luxury

b. -0.18; an inferior good

c. +0.25; a necessity use the midpoint method

d. +4.0; a luxury

Income Elasticity Exercise (2 of 3)

When median household income in Allentown rose from $3,300 to $3,900 per month, economists found that the quantity demanded of beef filet mignon rose from 6 pounds per month to 12 pounds per month. Based on this information, the calculated income elasticity is ----- which suggests that for consumers in Allentown beef is -----.

a. 0.50; a luxury

b. -0.18; an inferior good

c. +0.25; a necessity

d. +4.0; a luxury

Income Elasticity Exercise (3 of 3)

In Allentown, filet mignon is a luxury!

Supply Elasticity

Elasticity of Supply

ELASTIC SUPPLY (ε > 1)

The percentage change in the quantity supplied is greater than the percentage change in the price.

PERFECTLY ELASTIC (ε = ∞)

Horizontal supply curve

INELASTIC SUPPLY (ε < 1)

The percentage change in the quantity supplied is less than the percentage change in the price.

UNIT ELASTIC SUPPLY (ε = 1)

PERFECTLY INELASTIC (ε = 0)

Vertical supply curve

Which supply curve appears more elastic?

Which supply curve appears more elastic?

RELATIVELY FLATTER  RELATIVELY MORE ELASTIC

ELASTIC SUPPLY

Changes in demand can be met without large price changes.

Spare production capacity – such as during recessions

High stocks of raw materials and high inventories of finished products.

Easy factor substitution – inputs are easily configured for production of related goods (printing press: magazines vs books)

Time – long run supply is more elastic than short run supply (e.g., housing market)

INELASTIC SUPPLY

Changes in demand lead to large price changes

Production at or near capacity so unable to easily increase output

Scarcity of raw materials; low inventories of finished goods

Factor substitution inhibited - inputs not as mobile

Short run supply is less elastic when compared to the long run

Summary

Own Price Elasticity

Cross Price Elasticity

Substitute

Elastic substitute

Inelastic substitute

Complement

Elastic complement

Inelastic complement

Income Elasticity

Inferior good

Normal good

Necessity

Luxury

Supply Elasticity

More Examples and Exercises

Substitutes

Recall: if the price of a substitute good increases, then demand for a related good increases because buyers substitute one for the other, ceteris paribus.

India Pale Ale vs. India Rye Lager

Suppose the price of Imperial Pale Ale increases from $6/pint to $7/pint.

The quantity demanded falls from 4 pints to 3 pints. (this is the Law of Demand)

Substitute goods

CROSS PRICE ELASTICITY

where i is the good for which the price changed, and j is the substitute good

SIGN MATTERS!

CROSS PRICE ELASTICITY

IPA price increases

IRL demand increases

Qd of IRL at every price increases

εij = 4.3 > 0

SUBSTITUTE

ELASTIC

complements

Recall: if the price of a good increases, then demand for a complementary good falls

India Pale Ale vs. French Fries

Suppose the price of Imperial Pale Ale increases from $6/pint to $7/pint.

The quantity demanded falls from 4 pints to 3 pints (Law of Demand)

COMPLEMENT goods

CROSS PRICE ELASTICITY

where i is the good for which the price changed, and j is the substitute good

CROSS PRICE ELASTICITY

IPA price increases

FF demand decreases

Qd of FF at every price decreases

Complementary Good

Cross-price inelastic

Your turn

The price of good X increased from $12/unit to $18/unit.

The quantity demanded of good Y increased from 22 units to 24 units.

Using the midpoint method, calculate the cross price elasticity, and state whether the two goods are substitutes or complements, and whether the cross price elasticity is elastic, or inelastic.

The two goods are SUBSTITUTES and the cross price elasticity is INELASTIC

Exercise 2

The price of good X fell from $100/unit to $50/unit.

The quantity demanded of good Y increased from 20 units to 60 units.

Using the midpoint method, calculate the cross price elasticity, and state whether the two goods are substitutes or complements, and whether the cross price elasticity is elastic, or inelastic.

The two goods are COMPLEMENTS and the cross price elasticity is ELASTIC

Elasticity Matrix with Statistics

Who pays the tax?

Initially a market is in equilibrium, then the government imposes a tax on sales of this good. What effect will this have on the market’s equilibrium price and quantity?

Initially a market is in equilibrium, then the government imposes a tax on sales of this good. What effect will this have on the market’s equilibrium price and quantity?

Does this change affect demand or supply?

Initially a market is in equilibrium, then the government imposes a tax on sales of this good.

Supply Decreases:

shifts supply curve leftward

higher equilibrium price

lower equilibrium quantity

Initially a market is in equilibrium, then the government imposes a tax on sales of this good.

Supply falls

Price rises

Quantity falls

But who pays the tax?

A tax is represented as a left shift of the supply curve.

The tax is equal to the vertical difference from the original supply curve to the new supply curve.

The tax is equal to the vertical difference from the original supply curve to the new supply curve.

Buyers pay the new equilibrium price,

yet…. P2-P1 < TAX

So the buyers are not paying the full tax

Numerical Example

In equilibrium

P* = 170 Q* = 4

Now suppose a tax of $100 per unit…

Suppose the government imposes a $100 tax per unit sold.

New equilibrium price

$190

New equilibrium quantity

2 units

Before the tax

P* = 170 Q* = 4

After the tax

P* = 190 Q* = 2

But who paid the tax?

Before the tax

P* = 170 Q* = 4

After the tax

P* = 190 Q* = 2

Sellers apply the entire tax to the good, and pass the tax along to the buyer:

New price sellers would like to receive is $170 + $100 = $270/unit.

But the tax shifts the supply curve back so that the equilibrium price is higher $190…this does not cover the full tax!

Buyers pay (190-170) = $20 of the tax.

Sellers receive $190, and transfer $100 to the government ($20 of which came from buyers), which means that:

Sellers pay the remainder = $80 of the tax

Supply decreases such that the vertical distance equals the tax.

Buyers pay a tax that is equal to the difference in the old and new equilibrium prices.

Sellers pay the remainder.

Extreme conditions

What is required for buyers to pay the full tax?

What is required for sellers to pay the full tax?

Buyers PAY THE FULL TAX

Buyers PAY THE FULL TAX

SELLERS PAY THE FULL TAX

SELLERS PAY THE FULL TAX

Summary

A tax shifts supply leftward

The shift is such that the vertical distance from the old supply curve to the new supply curve is equal to the per unit tax

The equilibrium price rises (except in special cases)

The tax may be paid by buyers, the sellers, or both.

The Math of Taxes

Demand:

P = 12 – 2QD

Supply:

P = 4 + ½QS

Tax:

$2 per unit

The Math of Taxes

Demand:

P = 12 – 2QD

Supply:

P = 4 + ½QS

Tax:

$2 per unit

The Math of Taxes

Demand:

P = 12 – 2QD

Supply:

P = 4 + ½QS

 P* = 5.6, Q* = 3.2

Supply with $2 Tax:

(tax = intercept shift)

P = 4+2 + ½ QS

The Math of Taxes

Demand:

P = 12 – 2QD

Supply:

P = 4 + ½QS

 P* = 5.6, Q* = 3.2

Supply with $2 Tax:

P = 6 + ½ QS

 P* = 7.2, Q* = 2.4

The Math of Taxes

Demand:

P = 12 – 2QD

Supply:

P = 4 + ½QS

 P* = 5.6, Q* = 3.2

Supply with $2 Tax:

P = 6 + ½ QS

 P* = 7.2, Q* = 2.4

Ideally, the sellers would like the buyers to pay the full tax at $2 per unit.

That is, $5.60 + $2.00 = $7.60

Yet buyers paid $7.20

So sellers pay $0.40 (7.60-7.20)

Total Revenue = $7.20 x 2.4

= $17.28

Tax Revenue

$2 x 2.4 = $4.80

Net Revenue = $12.48

Summary

Other types of elasticity

Cross-price elasticity of demand

Substitutes and complements

Income elasticity

Elasticity matrix

Supply elasticity

Who pays the tax?

Demand elasticity

Supply elasticity