Rogerian Argument

Essay Rubric 200 points (2)

Essay Rubric 200 points (2)

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Content

80 pts

A

The essay is exciting to read and follows all guidelines given. It not only meets the assignment, but demonstrates a high level of creativity and concern for the intended audience. The thesis states the topic, attitude, and major supporting details as well as alludes to the overall structure of the writing. Extensive and effective evidence is thoroughly analyzed and integrated in the writing. Deliberate word choice conveys exact, appropriate meaning.

71 pts

B

The writing is better-than-average level, and all guidelines are followed. The idea is unique, though the depth of thought is not as sophisticated as it could be. The intended audience is appropriately addressed. The thesis is clear but could be more concise or creative. The evidence is effective though it may be cliche or not as vivid as it could be. Integration of evidence and analysis are appropriate but not deep. The writer's prose is more than competent.

63 pts

C

The essay meets the assignment's length and objectives, but the thesis is cliche or obvious and has deficiencies in two or more areas. The writing does not demonstrate sophisticated thought or a strong grasp of the concepts reviewed in the course. The intended audience may be confused at times. The argument is created but not in a refreshing or invigorating way. The thesis may not be immediately located by readers. Perhaps the evidence does not tie back to the thesis. The use of analysis is minimal or basic. The vocabulary resembles a conversation and not a well thought out academic essay.

55 pts

D

The essay does not meet expectations. It may fall short of length requirements or lack citations, and does not clearly address the intended audience. The argument is obvious or lacks exigence. The thesis is possibly implied but not recognizable by most readers, and the evidence is not well integrated. Analysis is missing, and the author shows no awareness of skills learned in the course.

0 pts

F

The writing does not follow directions and fails to meet the assignment by lacking a thesis or purpose. It does not meet length or citation requirements. The essay's thesis is not clear. There is no use of evidence or analysis.

0 / 80 pts

Organization

40 pts

A

The introduction invites the reader in and provides needed background information while the conclusion summarizes the key points and reinforces the thesis. Body paragraphs start with clear topic sentences and focus on one topic throughout. Ideas are presented in an organized manner, and appropriate transitions make the essay coherent.

35 pts

B

The essay's structure is clear to readers though it could be more effectively arranged to establish flow or integrate responses to opposing views. The introduction provides background and leads the reader in. The conclusion proves the thesis and ends the writing in a satisfying way. Most transitions are used effectively.

31 pts

C

The organization is discernible, but some sentences or paragraphs may be misplaced, thus causing the writing to seem disjointed. The introduction provides background, and the writing includes a conclusion, but it closely repeats information from the introduction. Some transitions are used effectively.

26 pts

D

Some ideas are placed logically. The introduction does not provide enough background information, and the conclusion repeats the information from the introduction. Transitions are used poorly.

0 pts

F

Paragraphs are poorly arranged. There is little or no introduction, and the conclusion leaves readers with questions. Transitions are used poorly if at all, and the essay's flow is nonexistent.

26 / 40 pts

Grammar

40 pts

A

The writing contains few if any grammatical errors and illustrates the author's command of diction, word choice, sentence structure, spelling and is free of distracting errors. No EFE's are visible.

35 pts

B

Though there may be occasional grammatical or mechanical errors, they do not hinder the reader's ability to appreciate the writing. No EFE's are visible.

31 pts

C

The writer displays weakness in grammar, mechanics, or punctuation through consistent but not egregious errors such as fragments, missing, commas, or spelling. Some minor EFE's are visible.

26 pts

D

Many sentence-level errors lead to poor paragraph structure. The writer struggles to grasp standard American English, and the writing contains consistent and egregious errors in grammar, mechanics, and punctuation. A lack of editing or proofreading is evident. Several EFE's are visible.

0 pts

F

Excessive errors of grammar, spelling, or punctuation cause the reader to struggle to comprehend the essay. Meaning is unclear due to incomprehensible sentences. Numerous EFE's are visible.

31 / 40 pts

MLA

40 pts

Full Marks

Paper follows all MLA guidelines. See template. If there are any outside sources used, all parenthetical (in-text) citations and the Works Cited page are completed correctly.

35 pts

B

Most formatting is completed correctly. One or two minor errors appear.

31 pts

C

Most formatting is correct. However, sources were used, and in-text and Works Cited citations do not properly reflect MLA style.

26 pts

D

The essay is not formatted correctly. Sources are used, but citations are not correct. URLs are used instead of correct citations.

0 pts

No Marks

Paper is not double spaced, font size may be incorrect in size or color. Sources are used without any documentation.

Comments

incorrect author on one source. This is a problem.

0 / 40 pts

Total Points: 57