Clinical Field Experience C: Literacy Pre-Assessment and Lesson Plan

profileRoyce0615
ClinicalFieldExperienceCLiteracyPreAssessmentandLessonPlanRubric_.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ELM-580 ELM-580-O500 Clinical Field Experience C: Literacy Pre-Assessment and Lesson Plan 25.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Content 100.0%
Mini-Lesson Plan 35.0% Not addressed. Mini-lesson plan has several errors. Learning objectives, instructional strategies, ELA learning activity, and formative assessment are poorly developed and inadequately aligned to chosen standards. Mini-lesson plan includes all components, with minimal errors. Learning objectives, instructional strategies, ELA learning activity, and formative assessment are overly simplistic and marginally align to chosen standards. Mini-lesson plan is proficiently designed with all components, including appropriate standards and grade level. Learning objectives, instructional strategies, ELA learning activity, and formative assessment are well developed and proficiently aligned to chosen standards. Mini-lesson plan is proficiently designed with all components, including appropriate standards and grade level. Learning objectives, instructional strategies, ELA learning activity, and formative assessment are well developed and proficiently aligned to chosen standards.
Reflection 35.0% Not addressed. Reflection is poorly written, is missing, and/or lacking in the description of feedback regarding lesson delivery and areas of potential growth. Reflection inadequately explains accommodations to meet the diverse needs of students and how you will use this in future professional practice. Reflection vaguely and superficially describes feedback regarding lesson delivery and areas of potential growth. Reflection is overly simplistic in explaining accommodations to meet the diverse needs of students and how you will use this in future professional practice. Reflection clearly and credibly describes feedback regarding lesson delivery and areas of potential growth. Reflection includes solid and appropriate details on accommodations to meet the diverse needs of students and how you will use this in future professional practice. Reflection proficiently describes how feedback regarding lesson delivery and areas of potential growth. Reflection includes thoughtful and extensive details on accommodations to meet the diverse needs of students and how you will use this in future professional practice.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 30.0% Not addressed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Total Weightage 100%