Clinical Field Experience B: Social Studies Pre-Assessment

1 No Submission 0.00%

2 Insufficient 69.00%

3 Approaching 74.00%

4 Acceptable 87.00%

5 Target 100.00%

100.0 %Content

30.0 % Pre-Assessment

Not addressed.

Pre-assessment is incomplete and is poorly developed in the social studies content area, with weak alignment to standards. Pre-assessment does not determine learning gaps and needs of students.

Pre-assessment is complete, but is underdeveloped in the social studies content area, somewhat aligned to appropriate standards. Pre-assessment inadequately determines learning gaps and needs of students.

Pre-assessment is adequately developed in the social studies content area, aligned to appropriate standards, in order to determine learning gaps and needs of students.

Pre-assessment is expertly and thoughtfully developed in the social studies content area, proficiently aligned to appropriate standards, in order to determine learning gaps and needs of students.

30.0 % Reflection

Not addressed.

Reflection includes a poor and unrelated description of how the pre-assessment provides data to determine learning gaps and needs. Explanation of the challenges in developing and delivering the pre-assessment is unfocused and missing key details.

Reflection includes a rudimentary description of how the pre-assessment provides data to determine learning gaps and needs. Explanation of the challenges in developing and delivering the pre-assessment could include more details.

Reflection is sound and competent with basic description of how the pre-assessment provides data to determine learning gaps and needs, including a relevant explanation of the challenges in developing and delivering the pre-assessment.

Reflection is thorough and comprehensive with detailed description of how the pre-assessment provides data to determine learning gaps and needs, including a thoughtful explanation of the challenges in developing and delivering the pre-assessment.

10.0 % Future Professional Implications

Not addressed.

Conclusions and applications to future practice are poor and do not reflect growth and development as a professional.

Conclusions and applications to future practice are entry level and minimally reflect growth and development as a professional.

Conclusions and applications to future practice are direct and reflect growth and development as a professional.

Conclusions and applications to future practice are insightful and thoughtfully reflect growth and development as a professional.

30.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Not addressed.

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking.

Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language.

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.

100 % Total Weightage