Clinical Field Experience A: Literacy in the Classroom

profileLynette89
ClinicalFieldExperienceALiteracyintheClassroomRubric.xlsx

Rubic_Print_Format

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
ECE-540 ECE-540-O500 Clinical Field Experience A: Literacy in the Classroom 25.0
Criteria Percentage No Submission (0.00%) Insufficient (69.00%) Approaching (74.00%) Acceptable (87.00%) Target (100.00%) Comments Points Earned
Criteria 100.0%
Observation Reflection: Literacy Development 15.0% Not addressed. Includes an incomprehensible description of the literacy development observed within the classroom. Includes a vague description of the literacy development observed within the classroom. Includes a detailed description of the literacy development observed within the classroom. Includes a comprehensive description of the literacy development observed within the classroom.
Observation Reflection: Assessment Strategies 15.0% Not addressed. Insufficiently describes literacy assessment strategies used within the classroom. Ambiguously describes literacy assessment strategies used within the classroom. Reasonably describes literacy assessment strategies used within the classroom. Proficiently describes literacy assessment strategies used within the classroom.
Selecting Groups 10.0% Not addressed. Erroneously discusses the process for selecting the small groups. Unclearly discusses the process for selecting the small groups. Concisely discusses the process for selecting the small groups. Discusses the process for selecting the small groups in-depth.
Rationale 15.0% Not addressed. Poorly discusses the rationale behind the activities including any data involved in the decision-making process. Marginally discusses the rationale behind the activities including any data involved in the decision-making process. Soundly discusses the rationale behind the activities including any data involved in the decision-making process. Insightfully discusses the rationale behind the activities including any data involved in the decision-making process.
Observation Reflection: Data 15.0% Not addressed. Inadequately explains how data is used within the observed classroom to guide instruction. Minimally explains how data is used within the observed classroom to guide instruction. Logically explains how data is used within the observed classroom to guide instruction. Thoroughly explains how data is used within the observed classroom to guide instruction.
Organization 15.0% Not addressed. An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are compartmentalized; may not relate to each other. The content may not be adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main idea. The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea. The content is well organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas related to each other. The content is presented as a cohesive unit. Provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.
Mechanics (spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 15.0% Not addressed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice, sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.
Total Weightage 100%