| Course Code | Class Code | Assignment Title | Total Points |
| ELM-580 | ELM-580-O500 | Clinical Field Experience A: Literacy Assessment and Framework | 25.0 |
| Criteria | Percentage | No Submission (0.00%) | Insufficient (69.00%) | Approaching (74.00%) | Acceptable (87.00%) | Target (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned |
| Content | 100.0% |
| Collaboration Summary | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Summary insufficiently describes and reflects upon the teacher interview. The examples provided are incomplete or irrelevant regarding literacy assessment, literacy framework, monitoring student needs, and utilizing technology in the classroom. | Summary adequately describes and reflects upon the teacher interview, providing basic examples regarding literacy assessment, literacy framework, monitoring student needs, and utilizing technology in the classroom. | Summary soundly describes and reflects upon the teacher interview, providing relevant examples regarding literacy assessment, literacy framework, monitoring student needs, and utilizing technology in the classroom. | Summary comprehensively describes and reflects upon the teacher interview, providing clear, exemplary insight regarding literacy assessment, literacy framework, monitoring student needs, and utilizing technology in the classroom. |
| Observations Reflection | 25.0% | Not addressed. | Summary description and reflection of the observation is incomplete or missing. Unsatisfactorily explaining how the teacher used literacy assessment and developed a literacy framework in the classroom. | Summary provides a satisfactory description and reflects upon observations, explaining how the teacher used literacy assessment and developed a literacy framework in the classroom. | Summary soundly describes and reflects upon observations, highlighting how the teacher used literacy assessment and developed a literacy framework in the classroom. | Summary comprehensively describes and reflects upon observations, clearly highlighting how the teacher used literacy assessment and developed a literacy framework in the classroom. |
| Future Professional Practice Application | 20.0% | Not addressed. | Summary poorly describes reflection of future professional practice application obtained during the observation and interview with the teacher during field experience. | Summary marginally describes reflection of future professional practice application obtained during the observation and interview with the teacher during field experience. | Summary provides a clear and detailed description reflecting on future professional practice application obtained during the observation and interview with the teacher during field experience. | Summary insightfully and thoroughly describes reflection of future professional practice application obtained during the observation and interview with the teacher during field experience. |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) | 30.0% | Not addressed. | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language or word choice is present. Sentence structure is lacking. | Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. Varieties of effective sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging. |
| Total Weightage | 100% |
Royce0615
ClinicalFieldExperienceALiteracyAssessmentandFramworkRubric.xlsx
