Classroom mangement

1 No submission 0.00%

2 Insufficient 65.00%

3 Approaching 75.00%

4 Acceptable 85.00%

5 Target 100.00%

100.0 %Criteria

20.0 %Interview Questions

Not addressed.

Questions were inconsistent with the assignment and/or prompted unclear responses and information.

Questions minimally consistent with the assignment which prompted basic responses and information.

Questions consistent with the assignment which prompted clear responses and information.

Questions are consistent with the assignment which prompted clear responses and information and the additional questions probed more deeply into key concepts.

20.0 %Findings from the Interview

Not addressed.

Interview summary is overly vague, unclear, or not related to assignment.

Summary adequately describes responses from the interviews.

Summary clearly describes responses from the interviews.

Summary thoroughly describes responses from the interviews.

20.0 %Conclusions from Interview [InTASC: 1, 2, 3; ACEI: 1, 3.2, 3.4]

Not addressed.

Conclusions from interview are not reasonable or are unrelated to the assignment.

Conclusions drawn from the interview are adequate.

Conclusions drawn from the interview are reasonable.

Conclusions drawn from the interview are well-developed.

20.0 %Application of Conclusions to Practice [InTASC: 1, 2, 3, 9, 10; ACEI: 1, 3.2, 3.4, 5.1, 5.2]

Not addressed.

Responses on applying conclusions to practice are unclear, underdeveloped, or are not related to the assignment.

Application of conclusions drawn from the interview adequately reflect growth and development as a professional.

Application of conclusions drawn from the interview clearly reflect growth and development as a professional.

Application of conclusions drawn from the interview reflect growth and development as a professional with an awareness of the needs of students, parents, and community.

20.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

100 %Total Weightage