|
|
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
|
2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%
|
3
Satisfactory
75.00%
|
4
Good
85.00%
|
5
Excellent
100.00%
|
|
10.0 %Explanation of Social Worker
|
|
|
10.0 %Content
|
Job aid omits or incompletely explains the role of a social worker that would benefit a beginning case manager. Job aid does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
|
Job aid inadequately explains the role of a social worker that would benefit a beginning case manager, but explanation is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Job aid demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.
|
Job aid adequately explains the role of a social worker that would benefit a beginning case manager, but explanation is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Job aid demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
|
Job aid clearly explains the role of a social worker that would benefit a beginning case manager, and explanation is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Job aid demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.
|
Job aid expertly explains the role of a social worker that would benefit a beginning case manager, and explanation is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Job aid demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
|
|
|
10.0 %Explanation of Client in Various Populations
|
|
|
10.0 %Content
|
Job aid omits or incompletely explains the role of a client in various populations that would benefit a beginning case manager. Job aid does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
|
Job aid inadequately explains the role of a client in various populations that would benefit a beginning case manager, but explanation is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Job aid demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.
|
Job aid adequately explains the role of a client in various populations that would benefit a beginning case manager, but explanation is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Job aid demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
|
Job aid clearly explains the role of a client in various populations that would benefit a beginning case manager, and explanation is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Job aid demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.
|
Job aid expertly explains the role of a client in various populations that would benefit a beginning case manager, and explanation is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Job aid demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
|
|
|
20.0 %Best Practice Recommendations
|
|
|
20.0 %Content
|
Job aid omits or incompletely explains the best practice recommendations for social workers regarding the appropriate problem-solving strategies and assessment techniques for the various populations that would benefit a beginning case manager. Job aid does not demonstrate understanding of the topic.
|
Job aid inadequately explains the best practice recommendations for social workers regarding the appropriate problem-solving strategies and assessment techniques for the various populations that would benefit a beginning case manager, but explanation is weak and missing evidence to support claims. Job aid demonstrates poor understanding of the topic.
|
Job aid adequately explains the best practice recommendations for social workers regarding the appropriate problem-solving strategies and assessment techniques for the various populations that would benefit a beginning case manager, but explanation is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Job aid demonstrates a basic understanding of the topic.
|
Job aid clearly explains the best practice recommendations for social workers regarding the appropriate problem-solving strategies and assessment techniques for the various populations that would benefit a beginning case manager, and explanation is strong with sound analysis and some evidence to support claims. Job aid demonstrates understanding that extends beyond the surface the topic.
|
Job aid expertly explains the best practice recommendations for social workers regarding the appropriate problem-solving strategies and assessment techniques for the various populations that would benefit a beginning case manager, and explanation is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Job aid demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the topic.
|
|
|
30.0 %Presentation of Content
|
|
|
30.0 %Content
|
The content in the job aid lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
|
The content in the job aid is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.
|
The content in the job aid is generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.
|
The content in the job aid is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.
|
The content in the job aid is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
|
|
|
10.0 %Layout
|
|
|
10.0 %Content
|
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.
|
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.
|
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.
|
The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
|
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
|
|
|
10.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness
|
|
|
10.0 %(includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
|
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.
|
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.
|
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.
|
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.
|
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
|
|
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing
|
|
|
5.0 %(includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Job aid errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
|
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.
|
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.
|
Job aid is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.
|
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.
|
|
|
5.0 %Documentation of Sources
|
|
|
5.0 %(citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
|
Sources are not documented.
|
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
|
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
|
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
|
|
|
100 %Total Weightage
|
|
|