BA-300

CLASS PARTICIPATION PROMPTS: CLASS 2

For those of you who did not participate in the class discussion in one or more of the segments, here are the prompts:

The class participation question for credit for skit 1 is: The question presented by the skit was: “What should Michael do with the company?” Applying objectivism, the ethic of care, or virtue ethics, explain what you believe Michael should have done and why. Note: You must apply one of the theories to earn credit for this response. The class participation question for the Apple case study (segment 2) is: The question presented by the case study was: “What, if any, action should Apply take to address the issues addressed in the case study concerning Apple’s supplier of tin for its devices?” Applying shareholder primacy theory, stakeholder theory, or the Integrative Social Contracts Theory please provide your answer to this question.

The class participation question for the whistleblower case study (segment 3) is: “Applying one or more of the whistleblowing concepts in the Trevino text or Dr. Ryan’s video, please briefly explain why and how Pao should have blown the whistle on her employer’s practices. Please follow the above instructions carefully. Please also note the response deadline on the syllabus.