4.5k-word paper
MANAGERIAL APPROACHES
THE CHOICE OF RECIPES
MANAGING EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
- Employee Relations involves systems, ideas, policies, procedures and structures for managing potential or actual conflict.
- Employee Relations strategy involves those ways of acting, as above, whose aim is to minimize or contain the conflicts of interests which potentially inhibit organizational effectiveness
Employee relations-post war context
- Collectivised workplaces
- Aspiring workers
- Growing Trade Unions
- State owned industries and nationalisation
- Conduct of employee relations through trade union recognition and collective bargaining
- Political orientation towards corporatism
- Therefore managing with trade unions (Williams, 2017: 144)
MANAGERIAL control of the labour process
- Taylorism & control: scientific management
Manual and mental work – division of labour
- Braverman and the deskilling thesis
- Fordist production processes – what kind of control?
- The role of technology/ task fragmentation/short task cycle times
- Command and control approaches involving a focus on strict regimes and punitive practices
The limits of fordist control
- Associated with mass production more than service, retail or knowledge economies
- Efficiency to do with economies of scale and low unit costs
- The challenge of globalisation
- Neo-fordism – workers become flexible with multiple skills and multiple tasks
- Post-fordism – flexible multi-skilled workers engaged in teamwork production processes in flat hierarchies (flexible specialization), emphasis on ‘quality’ and ‘commitment’
- Therefore ‘command and control’ has limits
MANAGERIAL APPROACHES
- Collectivism………………Individualism
- Collective determination of pay and conditions, to individualistic approaches to performance management
- Pluralism…………………….Unitarism
- Representation of different interests, to the articulation of all interest through the business goals and strategy
Pluralism and Unitarism
Pluralism
- Collectivism
- Trade Union recognition
- Collective bargaining
- A degree of power-sharing
- Collective ‘indirect’ representation, participation and involvement
- Focus on pay and conditions
- Trade unions a legitimate partner at local and national levels
- Inclusion in policy making frameworks
- Sympathetic legislation for TU
Unitarism
- Individualism
- Managing without unions
- Decisions by managerial prerogative (HRM practices)
- Management as the single source of authority
- ‘direct’ forms of participation and involvement
- Focus on task improvement
- Trade unions not seen as legitimate
- Absent in policy making frameworks
- Anti- Trade union legislation and ideology
STYLES OF MANAGING EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
(Farnham and Pimlott)
- Participative - highly pluralistic (collective) and developed systems for employee involvement – more democratic systems (eg NHS)
- Paternalistic - somewhat pluralistic (but not collective) but low on employee involvement and power sharing (eg Quaker companies Rowntrees, Reckitts)
- Consultative - highly unitarist (individualistic)in orientation but has systems of employee involvement perhaps at a low level (M & S; John Lewis)
- Authoritarian - highly unitarist (individualistic) and no systems for employee involvement (eg Sports Direct)
(Sisson 1989, Storey &Sisson 1993, 2001)
Developments in Management Style
- TRADITIONAL - Labour viewed as a factor of production, unions opposed
- CONSTITUTIONAL - Similar to ‘traditional’ especially for unskilled labour but unions recognised and tolerated, management prerogatives defended through collective agreements
- CONSULTATIVE - similar to ‘sophisticated human relations’ except unions are recognised. Attempts to work constructively with them
- SOPHISTICATED HUMAN RELATIONS - Core workers well rewarded, emphsis on flexible reward structures, communication strategies etc, undermines the need for unionisation?
The contemporary context
- Fall in influence and incidence of TUs (even so there were 3,000 recognition agreements between 2000-2010 Williams 2017:151)
- Rise of sectors without collectivised traditions of conflict resolution and decision-making
- Sophisticated HRM and employment relations – shift from ‘compliance to commitment’
THE MANAGERIAL AGENDA
- Move towards ‘Integrationist’ Management Strategies
- Began with Peters & Waterman and the ‘excellence’ movement in the early 1980s
- Became a popular and dominant strategy for management of employee relations
- Emphasis on ‘Top Down’ Strategy
- Unitary management ideology
- Management of corporate culture
- The ‘hearts and minds’ approach
- Emphasis on communication
THE MANAGERIAL AGENDA
- Trade Unions either marginalised or embraced into ‘Partners in Change’ strategies
- Stronger emphasis on ‘Employee Development’ strategies
- ‘Investers in People’
- ‘The Learning Organisation’
- Customer and Quality Focus
STRATEGIES FOR ORGANISATIONAL INTEGRATION
- Create and communicate the organisation’s mission
- Establish ‘core values’ and promote essential behaviours
- Promote the concept of ‘common purose’
- Emphasise the need for unity by focussing on external threats eg competitors, customer requirements, funding sources etc
- Reinforce desired ‘culture’ through strong leadership and through human resource strategy
EMPLOYEE RELATIONS AND STRATEGIC HRM
- NUMERICAL FLEXIBILITY
- Human Resource Planning
- FUNCTIONAL FLEXIBILITY
- skill flexibility, perfomance management, employee development
- FINANCIAL FLEXIBLITY
- core and periphery HR planning, performance related pay
- CORE AND PERIPHERY
- ‘THE FLEXIBLE FIRM’
- SYSTEMS OF REPRESENTATION
- ORGANISATIONAL STYLE AND CULTURE
HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEE RELATIONS
- ‘HARD’ HRM - Employees as ‘overheads’ (costs to be minimised)
- Numerical flexibility
- Financial flexibility
- ‘SOFT’ HRM - Employees as ‘assets’ (assets to be developed)
- Functional flexibility
- Financial flexibility
Reading: core texts (see module handbook on canvas)
- Williams S (2017) ch 5 -7 Introducing Employment Relations
- Dibben et al (2011) Employment Relations ch 4