week 5 m
Class data table along with calculated norm referenced scores (20 points, consistent with calculations)
|
Student |
Objective 1 |
Objective 2 |
Objective 3 |
Summative assessment |
Performance assessment |
Unit Grade |
Percentile Rank |
Z score |
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEAN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STANDARD DEVIATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provide at least one sample calculation for each required calculation, (20 points, 5 points each)
Sample mean calculation (Appendix F):
Sample standard deviation calculation (Appendix F):
Sample percentile rank calculation (Appendix F):
Sample Z score calculation (see chapter 17):
Report for Student E (this can be any student; 60 points; 5 points for each objective/assessment report,15 points for interpretation of strengths, and 15 points for suggestions))
Objective 1 (5 points): discuss student’s performance, using percentile rank and Z score, as compared to the rest of the class
Objective 2 (5 points):
Objective 3 (5 points):
Summative assessment (5 points):
Performance assessment (5 points):
Overall unit (5 points):
Strengths (15 points): Identify one or two strengths
Suggestions (15 points): Identify one or two areas of improvement and provide resources for improvement