Economics
Reflection Rubric |
|
|
Evaluation Criteria
Distinguished 23 - 25 points
(92% - 100%)
Proficient 20.75 - 22.75 points
(83% - 91%)
Satisfactory 18.75 - 20.5 points
(74% - 82%)
Marginal 16.25 - 18.25 points
(65% - 73%)
Unsatisfactory 0 - 16 points (0% - 64%)
Score
Preparation
Reflection entry shows evidence of thorough preparation through reading or reflection. Author speaks as one who has knowledge to share.
Reflection entry shows evidence of preparation through reading or reflection. Author speaks as one who has knowledge to share.
Reflection entry shows some evidence of preparation through reading or reflection. Author demonstrates some knowledge applicable to prompt.
Reflection entry shows little evidence of preparation through reading or reflection.
Reflection entry shows no evidence of preparation through reading or reflection.
Quality of content
Reflection entry contains substantial information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s) completely.
Reflection entry contains substantial information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s).
Reflection entry contains some relevant information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s).
Reflection entry contains minimal information for reader. The entry addresses the focus question(s) weakly.
Reflection entry contains minimal information for reader. The entry does not address the focus question(s).
Personal reflection
Reflection entry conveys extensive evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s); demonstrates the author's growth through reflection on learning.
Reflection entry conveys evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s); demonstrates the author is capable of reflecting on learning.
Reflection entry conveys evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s) with a few gaps in clarity; demonstrates the author is capable of some reflection on learning.
Reflection entry conveys little evidence of a personal response to the focus question(s).
Reflection entry shows no personal response to the focus question(s).
Conventions
Reflection entry shows few, if any errors in standard written English that do not interfered with understanding.
Reflection entry may have some errors in standard written English that rarely interfere with understanding.
Reflection entry has a few errors in standard written English that may interfere with understanding.
Reflection entry has several kinds of errors in standard written English that interfere with understanding.
Reflection entry has frequent and severe errors in standard written English that interfere with understanding.
Total: 100%
Levels of Achievement
Evaluation
Criteria
Distinguished 23 -
25 points
(92% - 100%)
Proficient
20.75 - 22.75 points
(83% - 91%)
Satisfactory
18.75 - 20.5 points
(74% - 82%)
Marginal
16.25 - 18.25 points
(65% - 73%)
Unsatisfactory
0 - 16 points
(0% - 64%)
Score
Preparation
Reflection entry
shows evidence of
thorough
preparation
through reading or
reflection. Author
speaks as one who
has knowledge to
share.
Reflection entry shows
evidence of preparation
through reading or
reflection. Author speaks
as one who has
knowledge to share.
Reflection entry shows
some evidence of
preparation through
reading or reflection.
Author demonstrates
some knowledge
applicable to prompt.
Reflection entry shows
little evidence of
preparation through
reading or reflection.
Reflection entry shows no
evidence of preparation
through reading or
reflection.
Quality of content
Reflection entry
contains
substantial
information for
reader. The entry
addresses the
focus question(s)
completely.
Reflection entry contains
substantial information
for reader. The entry
addresses the focus
question(s).
Reflection entry contains
some relevant
information for reader.
The entry addresses the
focus question(s).
Reflection entry contains
minimal information for
reader. The entry
addresses the focus
question(s) weakly.
Reflection entry contains
minimal information for
reader. The entry does
not address the focus
question(s).
Personal
reflection
Reflection entry
conveys extensive
evidence of a
personal response
to the focus
question(s);
demonstrates the
author's growth
through reflection
on learning.
Reflection entry conveys
evidence of a personal
response to the focus
question(s);
demonstrates the author
is capable of reflecting on
learning.
Reflection entry conveys
evidence of a personal
response to the focus
question(s) with a few
gaps in clarity;
demonstrates the author
is capable of some
reflection on learning.
Reflection entry conveys
little evidence of a
personal response to the
focus question(s).
Reflection entry shows no
personal response to the
focus question(s).
Conventions
Reflection entry
shows few, if any
errors in standard
written English that
do not interfered
with
understanding.
Reflection entry may
have some errors in
standard written English
that rarely interfere with
understanding.
Reflection entry has a
few errors in standard
written English that may
interfere with
understanding.
Reflection entry has
several kinds of errors in
standard written English
that interfere with
understanding.
Reflection entry has
frequent and severe
errors in standard written
English that interfere with
understanding.
Total:100%
Levels of Achievement