Class 6 Unit 2 Assignment
water2000
Class6Unit4AssignmentRubric.xlsxAssignment Rubric
| MN506 Unit 4 assignment grading rubric. | ||||||||
| Instructors: Enter values between 0 and 4 in the yellow cells in the Score column. | 175 | |||||||
| Content Rubric | Introductory | Emergent | Practiced | Proficient/Mastered | Score | Weight | Final Score | |
| 0 - 1.9 | 2 - 2.9 | 3 - 3.9 | 4 | |||||
| Create an ethical legal decision-making dilemma involving an advanced practice nurse in the field of education, informatics, administration, or a nurse practitioner. | Missing most or all information related to this variable. | The assignment contains some information on the topic, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. | Entry well-constructed and demonstrates connection to the course materials, the required topic, and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). | Demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper-level thinking (ethical and legal synthesis of dilemma). | 12.5% | 0.00 | ||
| Include one ethical principle and one law that would be violated and whether the violation would constitute a civil or criminal act based on facts in the law. | Missing most or all information related to this variable. | The assignment contains some information on the topic, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. | Entry well-constructed and demonstrates connection to the course materials, the required topic, and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). | Demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper-level thinking (ethical and legal synthesis of dilemma). | 12.5% | 0.00 | ||
| Construct a decision that would prevent violation of the ethical principle and prevent the law from being violated. | Missing most or all information related to this variable. | The assignment contains some of information on the topic, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. | Entry well-constructed and demonstrates connection to the course materials, the required topic and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). | Demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper level thinking (ethical and legal synthesis of dilemma). | 12.5% | 0.00 | ||
| Describe the legal principles and laws that apply to the ethical dilemma. | Missing most or all information related to this variable. | The assignment contains some information on the topic, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. | Entry well-constructed and demonstrates connection to the course materials, the required topic, and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). | Demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper-level thinking (ethical and legal synthesis of dilemma). | 12.5% | 0.00 | ||
| Support the legal issues with prior legal cases or state or federal statutes. | Missing most or all information related to this variable. | The assignment contains some of information on the topic, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. | Entry well-constructed and demonstrates connection to the course materials, the required topic, and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). | Demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper-level thinking (ethical and legal synthesis of dilemma). | 12.5% | 0.00 | ||
| Analyze the differences between ethical and legal reasoning and apply an ethical-legal reasoning model in the case study to create a basis for a solution to the ethical-legal dilemma. | Missing most or all information related to this variable. | The assignment contains some information on the topic, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. | Entry well-constructed and demonstrates connection to the course materials, the required topic, and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). | Demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper-level thinking (ethical and legal synthesis of dilemma). | 12.5% | 0.00 | ||
| List three recommendations that will resolve the advanced practice nurse's moral distress in the dilemma you have presented. | Missing most or all information related to this variable. | The assignment contains some information on the topic, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. | Entry well-constructed and demonstrates connection to the course materials, the required topic, and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). | Demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper-level thinking (ethical and legal synthesis of dilemma). | 12.5% | 0.00 | ||
| Based on the issue you presented and the rules of the law, apply the laws to your case and come up with a conclusion. | Missing most or all information related to this variable. | The assignment contains some information on the topic, but needs more clarity. Topic needs to be developed more thoroughly. | Entry well-constructed and demonstrates connection to the course materials, the required topic, and/or upper-level thinking (application or analysis). | Demonstrates substantial integration of course materials and/or use of upper-level thinking (ethical and legal synthesis of dilemma). | 12.5% | 0.00 | ||
| Content Score | 0 | |||||||
| Writing Deduction Rubric | Introductory | Emergent | Practiced | Proficient/Mastered | Score | Weight | Final Score | |
| 0-1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||||
| Grammar & Punctuation | The overall meaning of the paper is difficult to understand. Sentence structure, subject verb agreement errors, missing prepositions, and missing punctuation make finding meaning difficult. | Several confusing sentences or one to two confusing paragraphs make understanding parts of the paper difficult, but the overall paper meaning is clear. Many subject verb agreement errors, run-on sentences, etc. cause confusion. | A few confusing sentences make it difficult to understand a small portion of the paper. However, the overall meaning of a paragraph and the paper are intact. There may be a few subject verb agreement errors or some missing punctuation. | There are one or two confusing sentences, but the overall sentence and paragraph meanings are clear. There are a few minor punctuation errors such as comma splices or run-on sentences. | 4 | 35% | 1.40 | Note: Everyone starts with 4's for writing deductions=no deduction. |
| Spelling | The many misspelled words and incorrect words choices significantly interfere with the readability. | Many typos, misspelled words, or the use of incorrect words making understanding difficult in a few places. | Some misspelled words or the misuse of words such as confusing then/than. However, intent is still clear. | A few misspelled words normally caught by spellcheckers are present but do not significantly interfere with the overall readability of the paper. | 4 | 35% | 1.40 | |
| Order of Ideas & Length Requirement | Paper has some good information or research, but it does not follow assignment directions and is lacking in overall organization and content. | The order of information is confusing in several places and this organization interferes with the meaning or intent of the paper. However, the paper has a generally discernible purpose and follows assignment directions overall. | The order of information is confusing in a few places and the lack of organization interferes with the meaning or intent of the paper in a minor way. | The overall order of the information is clear and contributes to the meaning of assignment. There is one paragraph or a sentence or two that are out of place or other minor organizational issues. A few sentences may be long and hard to understand. Meets length requirements. | 4 | 20% | 0.80 | |
| APA | There is some attempt at APA formatting and citing. There are one or more missing parts such as the cover page or references list. Citation information may be missing. Citation mistakes make authorship unclear. Student does not provide peer reviewed journal articles. | This is an attempt use APA formatting and citing. There are both in-text citations and reference listings. Citation information may be missing or incorrect (i.e., websites listed as in-text or reference citations). There is an attempt to cite all outside sources in at least one place. Authorship is generally clear. Student uses less than 5 peer reviewed journal articles, or articles are not appropriate. | There is an overall attempt at APA formatting and citation style. All sources appear to have some form of citation both in the text and on a reference list. There are some formatting and citation errors. Citations generally make authorship clear. Student uses 5-6 peer reviewed journal articles. | There is a strong attempt to cite all sources using APA style. Minor paper formatting errors such as a misplaced running head or margins may occur. Minor in-text citation errors such as a missing page number or a misplaced date may occur. Quotation marks and citations make authorship clear. Student uses 7 or more peer reviewed journal articles. | 4 | 10% | 0.40 | |
| Writing Deduction | 0.00 | |||||||
| Final Score | 0.00 | |||||||
| Percentage | 0.00% | |||||||
| Feedback: | ||||||||
&"Arial,Bold"&18Assignment Rubric
&"Arial,Bold"&18Assignment Rubric
&"Arial,Bold"&18Assignment Rubric
&"Arial,Bold"&18Assignment Rubric
Sheet1
| 250 | |||||||||
| 2 | |||||||||
| 2 | |||||||||
| 2 | |||||||||
| 2 | |||||||||
| 2 | |||||||||
| 2 | |||||||||
| 12.5 | 2 | ||||||||
| 2 | |||||||||
| 4000 |
