Self-introduction

profileSam121094
Class2MGMT542fall2018.pptx

MGMT 542: Argument and Communication for International Business

Foundations Week

This class is 2.5 hours long.

Instructor: Alisa Gordaneer

Class 2

Attendance

1

Foundations Week – Day 2 Topics

• More about argument: counter-argument

• Characteristics of weak arguments

• Preparing for Assignment 2

Critical thinking and assignment analysis

• Organizing your argument: pyramid and paragraphing

• Topic sentences and evidence sentences

Image source: http://www.coachingcompany.co.za/coaching_outcomes.php

Introduction to argument

Claims and evidence

Critical Thinking

Argument and logic

Using quotations

Writing practice exercises

Looking ahead: TAPS for Assignment 4

2

Counter-argument

Discuss with your team:

What is counter-argument?

Why is it used?

Counter argument

Argument

Counter Argument

Counter argument

Demonstrates you have considered another point of view

Rebuttal of the counter-argument strengthens your main argument

On one level: the argument can look solid

Image source: http://www.fotopedia.com/items/flickr-3434373431

6

Different Perspective: can show its weaknesses

Image source: http://www.flickr.com/photos/xlibber/7825817890/

7

What makes an argument weak?

Image source: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ac/Peacock_terms.png

8

A weak argument

Is based on flawed logic (see Week 2 reading: Rhetological Fallacies)

Does not have sufficient evidence to support it

Supports with irrelevant or unrelated evidence

Is not tested against other perspectives

Is not logically organized

Just a few common errors in logic

Anonymous authority

“They say…”

Unrelated evidence

9-11 was a conspiracy because it happened in New York.

Slippery slope

If we allow self-driving cars, computers will figure out a way to take over the world.

Biased generalizing

9 out of 10 dentists agree this toothpaste is the best.

Overgeneralizing

Businesses must be allowed to pursue profit without interference from the government.

Reading: Rhetological Fallacies (Week 2)

Insufficient evidence

How much is too little?

How much is enough?

Two Components of Sufficiency…

Do not omit key information

Explore points deeply

13

Sufficiency  Fairness

Covering key points is linked to the concept of fairness

Always create arguments that present your views in a fair way, without omitting key evidence.

This makes you more credible. If you seem biased, it reduces your credibility

Intuition

Personal experiences or anecdotes

Testimonials

Personal observations

Analogies

Appeals to experts

Primary research (research author has done themselves)

Secondary research (research author is quoting)

Academic theories

Case facts

What types of evidence can you use?

Frequently,

in all assignments

Almost

never

Sometimes

(Assignment 2)

That said, in business school, you will generally want to explain your intuition, using other forms of evidence. Use intuition, but then you’ll need to go into material to find evidence to support it. What gives you the intuition in the first place? For Hawaii vs. Alaska, it might be that I’m vaguely aware of differences in temperature and my dislike of cold. I could use those as evidence to support my decision.

In your MBA classes, you will frequently be drawing on evidence like primary and secondary research, as well as academic theories and case facts in order to support your claims.

That said, you will sometimes be using personal experiences or anecdotes as well. For example, in the leadership class you will be taking, you will be asked to make claims about yourself, as a leader, through drawing on both the readings you will do for class and your personal professional experiences.

What’s key to remember here are that there are different types of evidence and that it will be up to you to use the type that is appropriate for a given situation.

15

Untested against other perspectives

Image source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4UtEQaDw8Y

16

Untested against other perspectives

Image source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4UtEQaDw8Y

17

A complete argument has several parts

Claim

Evidence

Counter-argument and rebuttal

Reassertion of claim

For example

Let’s build an argument.

Our claim is “Communication is the most important skill for global learners to develop.”

Let’s assume we have plenty of researched evidence

Discuss with your team: What reasons can you think of to support this claim?

Discuss with your team

What is another perspective for this statement?

“Communication is the most important skill for global learners to develop.”

What are the weaknesses of that perspective?

We’ll hear back from each team.

Building a complete argument

Claim

Evidence

Counter-argument

Reassertion of claim:

“Communication is the most important skill”

Information, data, examples that illustrate why communication is important

Another valid perspective (what did your team identify?)

Rebuttal

What are the weaknesses of that perspective?

So clearly, communication is the most important skill

Argument and the writing process

Prewriting

Writing

Postwriting

Building your argument requires…

Prewriting

Analyzing your assignment

Writing

Organizing your argument

Postwriting

Editing your argument

Conceiving a thesis

Finding evidence

Developing reasons

Revising your argument

Think first, organize next

The writing process

Prewriting

Writing

Postwriting

Prewriting essentials

Assignment analysis

Brainstorming/list/talk it out

Research (internal or external)

Prewriting for Assignment 2

Analyze your assignment

Open “Assignment 2” description

Discuss with your team:

Why are you being asked to do this assignment?

What do you need to do to complete this assignment successfully?

What is not required in this assignment?

What are the most important things to keep in mind?

How do you know how you’ll be assessed?

Terminology

Strength: a beneficial characteristic/quality/attribute that you possess

Ability: a talent or skill in a particular area

Skill: something you are able to do well or have developed expertise in

Talent: something you have natural aptitude for

29

Rubrics: your key to evaluation

Prewriting: Your turn

Develop your assignment’s main claim by brainstorming or making lists:

What are you good at?

How do those skills/abilities demonstrate a strength?

Argument building basics

Sometimes called

subclaims

Claim: My strength is…

Reason (is also disputable + supportable)

More evidence supports this other reason

Evidence supports this other reason

Reason (is also disputable + supportable)

Evidence supports this reason

More evidence supports this reason

Prewriting: Your turn

Internal research: what information do you need to find to prove your claims?

Make a list.

What do you already know?

What will you need to look up?

Assignment 2 building blocks

Main Claim

Reasons (subclaims) supporting that claim

Evidence

What strength do you have?

Why do your skills and abilities indicate that strength?

What examples could you include, to illustrate your related skills and abilities?

A weak argument

Is not logically organized.

How can you fix this?

You have to have something to organize in the first place.

So, how do you make sense of this?

36

Organizing your argument

Pyramiding and paragraphing

The Pyramid Principle

Barbara Minto. The Pyramid Principle: Logic in Writing and Thinking. (1981)

Let’s get started. What is the Pyramid Principle?

The Pyramid Principle is a system for logically organising thinking that was written about in a book by Barbara Minto in 1981. It was later adopted by Mckinsey Consulting and became somewhat a standard in Business communication.

The document you read in Week 1 was written by Stephen Long, who teaches OB here. It’s a summary of the book’s main points.

The Pyramid Principle is not that different from other methods you may already use for creating an outline. It is, however, somewhat more rigorous than other methods. Also, at Royal Roads, where you will be doing so much teamwork, it can be helpful to adopt common systems. Even if you have your own approach to organising documents, please try, at least for now, working with this system—not because it is better than your own—but because it will provide you and your teammates a common language.

38

Document = Sandwich

39

To begin, it can be helpful to think of a document like a sandwich. There’s a piece of bread on the top and the bottom. And then, there’s the good stuff in the middle.

This is analogous to a document, with an introduction at the start, a conclusion at the end, and what’s most important—your argument—in the middle.

Document = Sandwich

Body

Conclusion

Introduction

40

When we discuss the Pyramid Principle, we will be discussing only the body of the document. So as we move through the rest of this presentation, please keep that in mind. Generally, you want to start with the body of your document, since it is only once you know what the body contains that you can compose an introduction or a conclusion.

Pyramid Basics

Determine your main point

Ask the question your readers will want to know

Keep asking questions until readers have no more logical questions

Here’s how it works.

You determine your main point—or, in the language of argumentation, your main claim. Here’s my position statement. Then you ask the question your reader will want to know. You then you keep asking questions until the typical reader would have no more logical questions.

41

Example: Cover Letter

Let’s use a straightforward example to illustrate: A Cover Letter. What’s the main point of a cover letter? To persuade the reader to call you in for an interview, and ultimately to hire you.

Example you reviewed in week one.

42

The pyramid helps you sort out your thoughts so your reader can follow them

Hire me

For the sake of simplicity, we’ll say that you could summarize the document’s point in two words: Hire me.

Now, you ask the question your reader will want to know.

44

Hire me

Why?

In this case, “Why should I hire you?”

45

Hire me

Why?

I have relevant work

experience

I have a personality

that’s well-suited to

the job

I have the necessary education

You might provide three reasons: [READ]. In the case of this very short document, each of these sub-claims might represent a paragraph. When you are writing longer documents, each might represent a section, which could be several pages long.

Just as an aside, What kind of logic are we using here?

46

Hire me

Why?

I have relevant work

experience

I have a personality

that’s well-suited to

the job

I have the necessary education

What education?

The reader would then have more questions. For example, “What education do you have?”

47

Hire me

Why?

I have relevant work

experience

I have a personality

that’s well-suited to

the job

I have the necessary education

What education?

BCIT

RRU

On the job

You might then respond, I went to BCIT & RRU, and I have on-the job training. Each of these points might be a sentence or two within a paragraph about your educational experiences.

You’d continue in this way until you’ve responded to all questions you might anticipate from the reader.

48

Pyramid Basics: Three Rules

Ideas at any level in the pyramid must be summaries of the ideas grouped below them

Ideas in each grouping must be the same kind of idea

Ideas in each grouping must be logically ordered

There are three rules to adhere to in structuring your document. We’ll go through each using our cover letter example.

49

Hire me

Why?

I have relevant work

experience

I have a personality

that’s well-suited to

the job

I have the necessary education

What education?

BCIT

RRU

On the job

Ideas at any level in the pyramid must be summaries of the ideas grouped below them

One, [Read].

“Hire me” summarizes the whole document.

“I have the necessary education” summarizes your educational experiences: BCIT, RRU, and on-the-job training

Example from readings—pyramid did not effectively summarize what came below, paper only 80 because not as effective as could have been.

Look at heading—look at whether each paragraph under heading actually respond to what the heading suggests?

50

Hire me

Why?

I have relevant work

experience

I have a personality

that’s well-suited to

the job

I have the necessary education

What education?

BCIT

RRU

On the job

2. Ideas in a grouping must be the same kind of idea

Two, [Read].

Here, BCIT, RRU, and on the job training are all kinds of educational experiences.

By adhering to this rule, you will ensure that information you position in a given section of a document actually belongs in that section.

51

Hire me

Why?

I have relevant work

experience

I have a personality

that’s well-suited to

the job

I have the necessary education

What education?

BCIT

RRU

On the job

3. Ideas in each grouping must be logically ordered

Three, [Read].

There are different approaches to logically ordering ideas, but the most common approach in business and business-related study is to put more important information first.

In this example, the writer is probably a young person, not an older person, because in ordering their document, they have put education first, suggesting that their education is more impressive than their work experience. Older people, with extensive resumes, usually include their work experience first.

Other logical approaches include chronological, general to specific

52

Building your assignments

Words

Paragraphs

Your whole argument!

Sentences

Parts of a paragraph

Topic sentence

Evidence sentence(s)

Summative sentence

Topic sentences

What is a topic sentence?

Topic sentences

Begin each paragraph

Make a clearly stated claim

If you’re writing an argument: Contain your perspective or opinion

If you’re writing a summary: Contain the author’s perspective, opinion or main point

Evidence sentences

Logically link to claim in topic sentence

Illustrate claim with facts

Summarize and paraphrase information

Include direct quotes only when necessary

Include signal phrases and in-text citations as needed

Summative sentences

Answer “so what?”

Tie together claim and evidence

Can offer transition to next topic/claim

Pyramid into paragraph

Hire me

I have the necessary education

RRU, BCIT, on the job course

I have the right experience

Work at Place A

Work at Place B

I would be a great manager because I earned an MGM degree at RRU, a Bachelors of Commerce at BCIT, and received on-the-job training. I also have extensive experience from my work at Place A and Place B. This will allow me to be an effective employee.

60

Paragraph Length Depends on Audience

61

You Must Feed Your Reader Ideas in Digestible Bites…

…but paragraph size will depend on audience

61

Paragraph unity means putting just one idea in each paragraph. As a writer, you have the responsibility of feeding your reader one idea at a time.

Paragraph Length

Paragraphs too long

You are not doing the work of dividing ideas up for your reader

Paragraphs too short

You are not doing the work of making links for your reader

Appropriate Length?

3 sentences

8 sentences

Example: Cover letter paragraph

I would be a great manager because I have the right education and experience. I earned an MGM degree at RRU, a Bachelors of Commerce at BCIT, and received on-the-job training. I have also done lots of work at Place A and Place B. This will allow me to be an effective employee.

Parts of the paragraph

I would be a great manager because I have the right education and experience (topic sentence includes claim). I earned an MGM degree at RRU, a Bachelors of Commerce at BCIT, and received on-the-job training. I have also done lots of work at Place A and Place B. (Evidence sentences give examples to support claim) This will allow me to be an effective employee.(Summative sentence ties back to main point)

Questions?

Reflection

In your own notebook, make notes for yourself:

What do you know now that you didn’t know before?

What strength will you write about for your Assignment 2?

What subclaims/evidence will you use to support your claim?

Homework

Review PPTs and Week 2 readings

Complete Assignment 2 and submit by deadline (11:55pm Sunday)

Read through Week 3 material (to be posted by Monday morning)

68