Paper 3

Criteria

Levels of Achievement

Content

(70%)

Advanced

94-100%

Proficient

88-93%

Developing

1-87%

Not Present

Total

Synthesis and Conceptualization

19 to 20 Points

Within the context of the conflict resolution : the student is able to frame their intervention plan within the theoretical conceptualization noted in previous assignments. Additionally, the introduction of the paper sets up the critical elements of the paper.

17.75 to 18.75 Points

Within the context of the conflict resolution : the student is able to frame their intervention plan within the theoretical conceptualization noted in previous assignments. The introduction of the paper is somewhat vague with respect to the critical elements of the paper.

1 to 17.5 Points

Within the context of the conflict resolution : the student lacked specific frames of reference to the theoretical conceptualization of the issue. The introduction does not introduce the paper – it merely starts one section of the elements of the paper.

0 points

Not present

Analysis

19 to 20 Points

Within the context of the conflict resolution : the author clearly analyzes how the chosen intervention may cause change in the conflict dynamic and the impending impact on the parties of the conflict. Complex issues are navigated with precision.

17.75 to 18.75 Points

Within the context of the conflict resolution : the author outlines how the chosen intervention may cause change in the conflict dynamic and outlines a few dynamics of the impending impact on the parties of the conflict. Complex issues are handled but with a less nuanced approach and appreciation for all parties of the conflict.

1 to 17.5 Points

Within the context of the conflict resolution : the author vaguely outlines how the chosen intervention may cause change in the conflict dynamic and vaguely outlines a few dynamics of the impending impact on the parties of the conflict. Complex issues are avoided.

0 points

Not present

Conflict Resolution

19 to 20 Points

Within the context of the conflict resolution : the author successfully argues the need for criminal justice conflict resolution intervention in this situation. Clearly articulates why conflict resolution techniques are better than other methods.

17.75 to 18.75 Points

Within the context of the conflict resolution : the author generally argues the need for criminal justice conflict resolution intervention in this situation. Generally articulates why conflict resolution techniques are better than other methods.

1 to 17.5 Points

· Within the context of the conflict resolution : the author is less than convincing that criminal justice conflict resolution intervention in needed in this situation. The author’s articulation is not clear why conflict resolution techniques are better than other methods.

0 points

Not present

Christian Worldview

8.75 to 10 Points

Creates Christian Worldview Section and applies CWV elements and support in the conflict resolution action plan. Specific biblical references (book, chapter, and verse) should be used.

7.75 to 8.5 Points

Creates Christian Worldview Section and applies general CWV elements and support in explanation of the conflict resolution action plan with global referencing to biblical references (reference does not have book, chapter, and verse, rather, “the Bible says type of references).

1 to 7.5 Points

Christian Worldview mentioned. No specific section in the paper. Only general CWV elements and support in explanation of the conflict resolution action plan with global referencing to biblical references (reference does not have book, chapter, and verse, rather, “the Bible says type of references).

0 points

Not present

Structure (30%)

Advanced

94-100%

Proficient

88-93%

Developing

1-87%

Not Present

Total

Mechanics

8.75 to 10 Points

· No grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly and consistently. Writing is precise. Word choice is appropriate.

· Student has proper page count. Six to Eight pages (or more if page count waived by instructor) not including title page, abstract, or reference section.

7.75 to 8.5 Points

· Few grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used correctly. Writing style is sufficient. Word choice is adequate.

· Student has 70% of the proper page count of Six pages not including title page, abstract, or reference section.

1 to 7.5 Points

· Several grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors are present. Voice and person are used inconsistently. Writing style is understandable but could be improved. Word choice is generally good.

· Student has less than 70% of the proper page count of Six pages not including title page, abstract, or reference section.

0 points

Not present

APA Format

8.75 to 10 Points

· Citations and format are in current APA style. Cover page, abstract, main body, and reference section are correctly formatted. Paper is double to spaced with 1inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font.

7.75 to 8.5 Points

· Citations and format are in current APA style with few errors Cover page, abstract, main body, and reference section are present with few errors. Paper is double to spaced with 1 inch margins and written in 12 point Times New Roman font.

1 to 7.5 Points

· Citations and format are in current APA style though several errors are present. Cover page, abstract, main body, and reference section are included though several errors are present. Paper is double to spaced, but margins or fonts are incorrect.

0 points

Not present

Research Elements

8.75 to 10 Points

Academic primary and .gov (when necessary) are used well and include a minimum of 4 citations and the Holy Bible as listed below. Research may incorporate multiple viewpoints of complex issues. A complete and accurate reference section is provided. Arguments are correctly supported with research.

Standard:

· A minimum of 4 citations (past 10 years unless waived by professor), relevant, academic (peer reviewed) journals preferred. Must use at least one Holy Bible citation. Students may use additional sources to support their claims and may use non to academic sources as long as the minimum requirements above are met. Grade the best 4 citations.

7.75 to 8.5 Points

Research is aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues.

Academic primary and .gov (when necessary) are used well and include a minimum of 70% of the required 4 citations as listed below. Research is aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues. A complete and accurate reference section is provided. Arguments are correctly supported with research.

Standard:

· A minimum of 4 citations (past 10 years unless waived by professor), relevant, academic (peer reviewed) journals preferred. Must use at least one Holy Bible citation. Students may use additional sources to support their claims and may use non to academic sources as long as the minimum requirements above are met. Grade the best 4 citations.

1 to 7.5 Points

Less than 70% of the Academic sources required (4) citations as listed below are used. Reliance on popular sources is evident. Arguments incorporate limited research but often include personal opinion without appropriate support. Sources are, at times, not used appropriately. Research is not aware of multiple viewpoints of complex issues. An incomplete or inaccurate reference section is provided.

Standard:

· A minimum of 4 citations (past 10 years unless waived by professor), relevant, academic (peer reviewed) journals preferred. Must use at least one Holy Bible citation. Students may use additional sources to support their claims and may use non to academic sources as long as the minimum requirements above are met. Grade the best 4 citations.

0 points

Not present

Professor Comments:

Total:

/100