I need help writing a 8-12 page research paper on community policing.
CJUS 340 Research Paper Rubric
|
Criteria |
Levels of Achievement |
||||
|
Content (70%) |
Advanced 90-100% |
Proficient 70-89% |
Developing 1-69% |
Not Present |
Total |
|
Introduction and Issue Development |
9 to 10 points: · Clearly focused introduction; issue development is interesting and sophisticated throughout paper. · The topic is clearly presented and discussed in detail. · Concepts are thoroughly explained and connected to criminal justice topics. |
7 to 8.5 points: · Significant, but not major, flaws in introduction or idea development throughout paper. · The topic is presented and discussed appropriately. · Concepts are explained and connected to criminal justice topics with some weaknesses.
|
1 to 6.5 points: · Introduction unclear; idea development uneven and simplistic. · The topic is unclear or fairly clear but is discussed too broadly. · Concepts are not adequately explained or not connected to criminal justice topics. |
0 points Not present |
|
|
Use of Supporting Evidence and Analysis |
22.5 to 25 points: · Uses relevant scholarly support. · Supporting evidence is detailed, accurate, and convincing. · Contains full discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of supporting material. |
17.5 to 22 points: · Paper cites some relevant scholarly support. · Significant, but not major, flaws in use of supporting evidence. · Contains some discussion of the strengths and weaknesses of supporting material. |
1 to 17 points: · Paper cites inappropriate sources. · Use of supporting evidence uneven; weak conclusions based on the evidence provided. · Lacks adequate discussion of the strength and weaknesses of supporting material. |
0 points Not present |
|
|
Conclusion |
9 to 10 points: · The conclusion follows logically from research and analysis and is perceptive. · The conclusion clearly summarizes the research presented in the body of the paper. |
7 to 8.5 points: · Significant, but not major, flaws in conclusion. · The conclusion summarizes the research presented in the body of the paper. |
1 to 6.5 points: · The conclusion can be traced to research but embodies major flaws. · The conclusion does not adequately summarize the research presented in the body of the paper. |
0 points Not present |
|
|
Research |
22.5 to 25 points: · Sources meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. · Knowledge from the course is linked strongly and properly to the source material. |
17.5 to 22 points: · Sources meet required criteria and are only adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. · Knowledge from the course is linked only adequately to the source material. |
1 to 17 points: · Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course with source documentation is clearly deficient. |
0 points Not present |
|
|
Structure (30%) |
Advanced 90-100% |
Proficient 70-89% |
Developing 1-69% |
Not Present |
Total |
|
Grammar and Style |
9 to 10 points: · Strong sentence and paragraph structure. · Few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling. · Appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments. · Written in third person. |
7 to 8.5 points: · Some deficiencies in sentence or paragraph structure. · Small number of significant, but not major, errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing. · Contains some first person references. |
1 to 6.5 points: · Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development. · Work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations. · Contains several first person references. |
0 points Not present |
|
|
APA Format |
9 to 10 points: · Includes all items required by current APA and includes less than 2 APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. · Citations and reference page are correctly formatted. · Includes title and reference pages. |
7 to 8.5 points: · Omits up to 2 items required by current APA and includes less than 4 APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. · Citations and reference page are correctly formatted with minor mistakes. · Includes title and reference page. |
1 to 6.5 points: · Omits up to 4 items required by current APA and includes less than 6 APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. · Citations and reference page include numerous mistakes. · Missing title page and/or reference page. |
0 points Not present |
|
|
Organization |
9 to 10 points: · Length is at least 7 pages not counting the title and reference pages. · Properly submitted per instructions. · Cites a minimum of 3 peer reviewed journals. · Project is clearly organized, well-written, and in proper essay format including an introduction, body, and conclusion. |
7 to 8.5 points: · Length is at least 6 pages not counting the title and reference pages. · Not properly submitted per instructions. · Cites at least 2 peer reviewed journals. · Small number of significant, but not major, flaws in organization and writing; it is in proper essay format. |
1 to 6.5 points: · Length is less than 6 pages not counting the title and reference pages. · Not properly submitted per instructions. · Cites less than 2 peer reviewed journals. · Major problems in organization and writing; it does not completely follow proper essay format. |
0 points Not present |
|
|
Professor Comments: |
|
Total: |
/100 |