CJ 2300 MOD 4 Assignment
Indiana Tech
College of Professional Studies
CJ 2300 Substantive Criminal Law
Online Course Syllabus
Instructor Information Please see Professor Profile at the Blackboard instructional site.
Course Schedule Please see Course Schedule in the Course Syllabus area of the Blackboard instructional
site.
Online Course Policies All of the online courses taken by students are required to follow the policies posted
online at http://online.indianatech.edu/tech-policies/policies/. Please review the posted
policies carefully. If you are unable to abide by the policies listed, please contact the
Warrior Information Network (WIN) at 888.832.4742 and request to withdraw from this
course.
Textbook Schmalleger, F. (2006). Criminal law today: An introduction with capstone cases (3rd
ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Grading Events & Grading Criteria Unless otherwise specified, all assignments must be submitted via Blackboard
The following listed activities will become a part of the evaluation demonstrating your
mastery of course materials:
Event Each Total
Tests - 2 (weeks 3,5) 100 200
Written Projects (2) 50 100
Discussion Board (5) 20 100
Total 400
Exams
Exams may be a combination of multiple choice, true/false and essay questions. The final
test will NOT be a cumulative test. It will consist of material covered after the first test.
Students will have a set amount of time to complete the tests. If the test is not completed
in the set amount of time the students will not receive any points. You will need to read
the text to fully understand the material. Cutting and pasting from the internet or copying
from the text is plagiarism and will result in a failing grade. DO NOT ATTEMPT TO
TAKE A TEST FROM A TABLET OR PHONE.
Discussion Board
Students are expected to have read the assigned materials prior to the scheduled class
discussion and be able to intelligently respond to discussion questions. You are required
to post at least THREE times. The first post should be an original thread posted by the
date specified in the schedule that other students may comment. Your original thread is a
substantive post that answers the question posed in not less than 150 words. The second
and third posts will be in response to TWO fellow students and should be at least 50
words in length. Therefore, a simple one sentence "I agree..." statement will not suffice
for full credit. Postings made too late for other students to consider and respond (i.e., at
15 minutes before the due time) may not receive full credit.
This is in place to encourage dialog between the students. Avoid "Net Jargon" and use
proper English. For example, use "you" and not "u" when referring to another
person. See the Key Information Tab about proper online interaction. This is a formal
exercise; proper etiquette and grammar are necessary and will be a factor in grading.
Written Assignments - Topic Papers
The students will be presented with scenarios that require a resolution by the student
based on information in the textbook. Grades for problems will be based on the student's
ability to recognize and discuss the issue. Each assignment is worth 50 points. (50 points
X 2 assignments = 100 total points). The ultimate answer is not as important as the
student's ability to recognize the issues and apply the law to the facts in the scenario. The
response should include a statement of the law relevant to the issue and application of
that law to the facts. These answers should be at least 700 words, double-spaced 12 point
font, one inch margins. Students shall reference the text at least FOUR (4) times in each
paper and include a word count and bibliography (i.e., formal citation of the textbook) at
the end of the paper. Internet sources will not be allowed. References must ONLY come
from the text. However, the references must be independent (no doubling up of
references).
Written assignments are designed to aid you in critically thinking about a variety of
criminal justice topics and to get you engaged in the problem solving process. They may
be utilized in the discussion board to stimulate dialogue and to prompt any questions you
may have about the criminal justice system. Your responses should be thorough and
scholarly. Avoid jargon and street language as you are completing each of the responses
to these questions. For instance, “cop” is generally unacceptable, “police officer” is
preferred. A person may be “mentally ill” or “legally insane,” not “nuts”.
Complete responses must be submitted by 11:59 P.M. EST pm the date due by posting
through BlackBoard. It is YOUR responsibility to make sure you have correctly attached
the file and submitted the work. You can do this by going into your grade book and
clicking on the green asterisk (!) to see what files attached.
Scoring Rubric - 50 points total
Length, grammar construction of paper - 10 points Paper less than 700 words, poor grammatical usage, poor document construction -
0- 3 points.
Paper 700 + words, many grammatical problems, moderate document
construction 4 - 6 points
Paper 700+ words, few grammatical problems, good paper construction 7 - 10
points
Theoretical Sourcework - 10 points No theoretical component, insufficient cites used, internet sources, no
bibliography, theory cited not explained. Uses no references, the wrong references
(internet, Wikipedia) or uses the same cite repeatedly. 0 - 3 points
Theoretical component lacking substance. Theory referenced but not explained
mistakes with theory/citations. References not clearly marked. Some overlap on
citations used. 4 - 6 points
Well cited, four references well marked in the text including page numbers,
Citations/theory cited correctly. Bibliography well documented. 7-10 points
Critical thought 10 points No expansion of theory - no insight. Does not relate own experience/observations
to paper. 0 - 3 points
Some expansion of theory - little to moderate insight. Relates experience
somewhat accurately. 4-6 points
Expands theory to own experiences and observations. Questions/confirms
text/citations with own insight. 7-10 points.
Fits Assignment Parameters 20 points Assignment not followed. Does not address topics as noted. 0 - 5 points
Follows some aspects of assignment, but does not address all topics sufficiently 5
- 15 points
Addresses all aspects of assignments and goes beyond parameters as spelled out
in the assignment 15 - 20 points
Referencing examples: Direct – As stated by the Schmalleger, “At common law, all attempts were
punishable as misdemeanors. (Schmalleger, pg. 117).
Indirect – Schmalleger (2006 pg. 117) notes that all attempts were punishable as
misdemeanors at common law.
Bibliography page: Schmalleger, Frank (2006). Criminal Law Today An
Introduction with Capstone Cases, 3e. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson / Prentice
Hall.
Internet sources and information will not be used.
Grading Scale The following grading scale will be used to assign a grade at the end of the course: Percentage Achieved Grade Percentage Achieved Grade Percentage Achieved Grade
93% or above A 80% or above B- 70% or above C-
90% or above A- 77% or above C+ 60% or above D
87% or above B+ 73% or above C Below 60% F
83% or above B
Late Assignments All assignments and required online activities are due according to the deadline listed in
the course schedule. Granting deadline extension is the course instructor’s autonomy.
Incompletes If you are unable to complete the requirements for this course due to extenuating
circumstances, an Incomplete grade (I) may be granted if you meet the general guidelines
stated below.
General Guidelines for submitting a course incomplete request:
More than 50% of the course session has elapsed.
The student has encountered an unexpected situation that is beyond his or her control.
The student is o in good academic standing -- up-to-date on all of the course assignments and
has at least an overall passing grade,
o able to complete all of the remaining coursework within a session (5 weeks for a undergraduate course and 6 weeks for a graduate course) that
immediately follows the session the student is currently enrolled, and
o able to provide support documentations to substantiate the need for extra time should a session is not enough to complete the course requirements.
If an Incomplete is granted, the instructor will set a deadline for all work to be completed.
The deadline cannot go past one (1) session. All incomplete grades are subject to
approval by the designated university authority.
Course Related Communication
Online courses are conducted in an accelerated format. Timely communication is very
important. When receiving emails from your classmates or instructor, please respond as
soon as you can.
Students are REQUIRED to use their Indiana Tech email account for all course related
communication. The most direct, and effective, way to email your course instructor and
classmates, is by using the Send Email function within the Blackboard course site. When
you use the Send Email function, you automatically receive a carbon copy of the email
you sent. In the event when you need to substantiate your claim that you did email your
classmates or instructor, you can show that carbon copy to the person(s) who requested it.
Please note that Blackboard only permits you to send email, it does not provide you with
the check email function. All of the emails your classmates and instructor send to you
will be delivered to your Indiana Tech email account. You are strongly encouraged to
check your Indiana Tech email account regularly, preferably several times a week, to
minimize the likelihood of miscommunication.
The University policy requires each online course instructor to respond to a student’s
email within 24 hours. Unless there is an extraneous situation that prevents the instructor
from following this rule, you can expect to hear from the instructor within 24 hours. If
you don’t receive a reply within 24 hours, please do not hesitate to follow up with
another email or forward the carbon copy of the email you sent to
[email protected] with a note “Please help. It’s been 24 hours and I have
not heard from my instructor” and the University support staff will act on your behalf to
contact your course instructor.