Security Policy

profilemigzs
cis565grading-SecurityPolicy.docx

Points: 110

Case Study 2:Security Policy

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Explain the purpose of a university security policy and indicate the major reasons why they are necessary. Provide your opinion as to whether a university security policy is more or less important to have than a business security policy.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely explained the purpose of a university security policy and did not submit or incompletely indicated the major reasons why they are necessary. Did not submit or incompletely provided your opinion as to whether a university security policy is more or less important to have than a business security policy.

Partially explained the purpose of a university security policy and partially indicated the major reasons why they are necessary. Partially provided your opinion as to whether a university security policy is more or less important to have than a business security policy.

Satisfactorily explained the purpose of a university security policy and satisfactorily indicated the major reasons why they are necessary. Satisfactorily provided your opinion as to whether a university security policy is more or less important to have than a business security policy.

Thoroughly explained the purpose of a university security policy and thoroughly indicated the major reasons why they are necessary. Thoroughly provided your opinion as to whether a university security policy is more or less important to have than a business security policy.

2. Critique the level of completeness of the George Washington University Security Policy.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely critiqued the level of completeness of the George Washington University Security Policy.

Partially critiqued the level of completeness of the George Washington University Security Policy.

Satisfactorily critiqued the level of completeness of the George Washington University Security Policy.

Thoroughly critiqued the level of completeness of the George Washington University Security Policy.

3. Critique the level of completeness of the Harvard University Security Policy.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely critiqued the level of completeness of the Harvard University Security Policy.

Partially critiqued the level of completeness of the Harvard University Security Policy.

Satisfactorily critiqued the level of completeness of the Harvard University Security Policy.

Thoroughly critiqued the level of completeness of the Harvard University Security Policy.

4. Suggest one (1) additional policy or procedure for each university’s policy. Provide a rationale for your response.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely suggested one (1) additional policy or procedure for each university’s policy. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Partially suggested one (1) additional policy or procedure for each university’s policy. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Satisfactorily suggested one (1) additional policy or procedure for each university’s policy. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Thoroughly suggested one (1) additional policy or procedure for each university’s policy. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

5. 3 references 

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present