Must be ORIGINAL please. Need it by 7.p.m tomorrow night. 19 hours from now. Serious inquires only!!

profilesolier3
CIS562TP.docx

· Term Paper: Corporate Embezzlement Due Week 10 and worth 200 points Imagine you are employed by a large city police department as the leader of the digital forensics division. A large corporation in the city has contacted the police for assistance in investigating its concerns that the company Chief Financial Officer (CFO) has been using company money to fund personal travel, gifts, and other expenses. As per the company security director, potential evidence collected thus far includes emails, bank statements, cancelled checks, a laptop, and a mobile device. Write an eight to ten (8-10) page plan report in which you:

1. Explain the processes you would use to seize, search, collect, store, and transport devices and other potential sources of evidence. 

2. Indicate the personnel resources needed for the investigation and assess why you believe this amount of resources is warranted.

3. List the initial questions you would have for the security director regarding the company’s email environment and explain the tasks you would consider performing for this portion of the investigation.

4. Create an outline of the steps you would take to ensure that if a trial were brought against the CFO, the evidence collected would be admissible in the court of law.

5. Determine the potential evidence (including logs, devices, etc.) you would request from the company security director based on what she has identified and identify the other data sources you might consider reviewing.

6. Explicate the tools you would use for this investigation based on the potential evidence the company security director has already identified, as well as any other potential sources of evidence you might review. 

7. Describe the procedure and tool(s) you would consider utilizing for acquiring potential evidence from the CFO’s mobile device.

8. Use at least five (5) quality resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as quality resources. 

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

. Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.

. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:

. Describe and analyze practices in obtaining digital evidence.

. Compare and contrast the various types of computer forensic tools.

. Demonstrate the ability to develop procedural techniques in crime and incident scenes.

. Describe processes in recovering graphic, mobile, and email files.

. Develop a computer forensics plan that addresses and solves a proposed business problem.

. Use technology and information resources to research advanced issues in computer forensics.

. Write clearly and concisely about topics related to computer forensics planning using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.

Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.

Points: 200

Term Paper: Corporate Embezzlement

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Explain the processes you would use to seize, search, collect, store, and transport devices and other potential sources of evidence.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely explained the processes you would use to seize, search, collect, store, and transport devices and other potential sources of evidence.

Partially explained the processes you would use to seize, search, collect, store, and transport devices and other potential sources of evidence.

Satisfactorily explained the processes you would use to seize, search, collect, store, and transport devices and other potential sources of evidence.

Thoroughly explained the processes you would use to seize, search, collect, store, and transport devices and other potential sources of evidence.

2. Indicate the personnel resources needed for the investigation and assess why you believe this amount of resources is warranted.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely indicated the personnel resources needed for the investigation; did not submit or incompletely assessed why you believe this amount of resources is warranted.

Partially indicated the personnel resources needed for the investigation; partially assessed why you believe this amount of resources is warranted.

Satisfactorily indicated the personnel resources needed for the investigation; satisfactorily assessed why you believe this amount of resources is warranted.

Thoroughly indicated the personnel resources needed for the investigation; thoroughly assessed why you believe this amount of resources is warranted.

3. List the initial questions you would have for the security director regarding the company’s email environment and explain the tasks you would consider performing for this portion of the investigation.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely listed the initial questions you would have for the security director regarding the company’s email environment; did not submit or incompletely explained the tasks you would consider performing for this portion of the investigation.

Partially listed the initial questions you would have for the security director regarding the company’s email environment; partially explained the tasks you would consider performing for this portion of the investigation.

Satisfactorily listed the initial questions you would have for the security director regarding the company’s email environment; satisfactorily explained the tasks you would consider performing for this portion of the investigation.

Thoroughly listed the initial questions you would have for the security director regarding the company’s email environment; thoroughly explained the tasks you would consider performing for this portion of the investigation.

4. Create an outline of the steps you would take to ensure that if a trial were brought against the CFO, the evidence collected would be admissible in the court of law.

Weight: 20%

Did not submit or incompletely created an outline of the steps you would take to ensure that if a trial were brought against the CFO, the evidence collected would be admissible in the court of law.

Partially created an outline of the steps you would take to ensure that if a trial were brought against the CFO, the evidence collected would be admissible in the court of law.

Satisfactorily created an outline of the steps you would take to ensure that if a trial were brought against the CFO, the evidence collected would be admissible in the court of law.

Thoroughly created an outline of the steps you would take to ensure that if a trial were brought against the CFO, the evidence collected would be admissible in the court of law.

5. Determine the potential evidence (including logs, devices, etc.) you would request from the company security director based on what she has identified and identify the other data sources you might consider reviewing.

Weight: 15%

Did not submit or incompletely determined the potential evidence (including logs, devices, etc.) you would request from the company security director based on what she has identified; did not submit or incompletely identified the other data sources you might consider reviewing.

Partially determined the potential evidence (including logs, devices, etc.) you would request from the company security director based on what she has identified; partially identified the other data sources you might consider reviewing.

Satisfactorily determined the potential evidence (including logs, devices, etc.) you would request from the company security director based on what she has identified; satisfactorily identified the other data sources you might consider reviewing.

Thoroughly determined the potential evidence (including logs, devices, etc.) you would request from the company security director based on what she has identified; thoroughly identified the other data sources you might consider reviewing.

6. Explicate the tools you would use for this investigation based on the potential evidence the company security director has already identified, as well as any other potential sources of evidence you might review.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely explicated the tools you would use for this investigation based on the potential evidence the company security director has already identified, as well as any other potential sources of evidence you might review.

Partially explicated the tools you would use for this investigation based on the potential evidence the company security director has already identified, as well as any other potential sources of evidence you might review.

Satisfactorily explicated the tools you would use for this investigation based on the potential evidence the company security director has already identified, as well as any other potential sources of evidence you might review.

Thoroughly explicated the tools you would use for this investigation based on the potential evidence the company security director has already identified, as well as any other potential sources of evidence you might review.

7. Describe the procedure and tool(s) you would consider utilizing for acquiring potential evidence from the CFO’s mobile device.

Weight: 10%

Did not submit or incompletely described the procedure and tool(s) you would consider utilizing for acquiring potential evidence from the CFO’s mobile device.

 

Partially described the procedure and tool(s) you would consider utilizing for acquiring potential evidence from the CFO’s mobile device.

Satisfactorily described the procedure and tool(s) you would consider utilizing for acquiring potential evidence from the CFO’s mobile device.

Thoroughly described the procedure and tool(s) you would consider utilizing for acquiring potential evidence from the CFO’s mobile device.

8. 5 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

9. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present