Forced Decryption Ruled Unconstitutional

Points: 60

Case Study 2: Forced Decryption Ruled Unconstitutional

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 70% F

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Analyze the decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit of Appeals to determine whether you believe the decision rendered was correct or incorrect based on the evidence suspected by the Government.

Weight: 25%

Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit of Appeals to determine whether you believe the decision rendered was correct or incorrect based on the evidence suspected by the Government.

Partially analyzed the decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit of Appeals to determine whether you believe the decision rendered was correct or incorrect based on the evidence suspected by the Government.

Satisfactorily analyzed the decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit of Appeals to determine whether you believe the decision rendered was correct or incorrect based on the evidence suspected by the Government.

Thoroughly analyzed the decision by the 11th U.S. Circuit of Appeals to determine whether you believe the decision rendered was correct or incorrect based on the evidence suspected by the Government.

2. Evaluate the effect of this ruling on forensic investigations from a forensics standpoint and determine whether or not you would consider this an “ open door” for criminal activity. Justify your answer.

Weight: 30%

Did not submit or incompletely evaluated the effect of this ruling on forensic investigations from a forensics standpoint; did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not you would consider this an “ open door” for criminal activity; did not submit or incompletely justified your answer.

Partially evaluated the effect of this ruling on forensic investigations from a forensics standpoint; partially determined whether or not you would consider this an “open door” for criminal activity; partially justified your answer.

Satisfactorily evaluated the effect of this ruling on forensic investigations from a forensics standpoint; satisfactorily determined whether or not you would consider this an “open door” for criminal activity; satisfactorily justified your answer.

Thoroughly evaluated the effect of this ruling on forensic investigations from a forensics standpoint; thoroughly determined whether or not you would consider this an “open door” for criminal activity; thoroughly justified your answer.

3. Take a position on whether or not you believe technology is moving too fast for the judicial system. Suggest at least two (2) improvements that the courts can make in order to catch up and / or keep up with the advancements in technology issues and crimes.

Weight: 30%

Did not submit or incompletely took a position on whether or not you believe technology is moving too fast for the judicial system; did not submit or incompletely suggested at least two (2) improvements that the courts can make in order to catch up and / or keep up with the advancements in technology issues and crimes.

Partially took a position on whether or not you believe technology is moving too fast for the judicial system; partially suggested at least two (2) improvements that the courts can make in order to catch up and / or keep up with the advancements in technology issues and crimes.

Satisfactorily took a position on whether or not you believe technology is moving too fast for the judicial system; satisfactorily suggested at least two (2) improvements that the courts can make in order to catch up and / or keep up with the advancements in technology issues and crimes.

Thoroughly took a position on whether or not you believe technology is moving too fast for the judicial system; thoroughly suggested at least two (2) improvements that the courts can make in order to catch up and / or keep up with the advancements in technology issues and crimes.

4. 2 references

Weight: 5%

No references provided

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

5. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements

Weight: 10%

More than 6 errors present

5-6 errors present

3-4 errors present

0-2 errors present