CIS512 W9

profileKupKake
CIS512W9RUBRIC.docx

CIS512 W9 RUBRIC

Content

Top of Form

Name: CIS512 Week 9 Assignment 3: Apple versus Samsung

Description: CIS512 Week 9 Assignment 3: Apple versus Samsung

· Grid View

· List View

 

Unacceptable Below 70% F

Fair 70-79% C

Proficient 80-89% B

Exemplary 90-100% A

CIS512-A3-1 1. Compare and contrast the features of both the Apple iPad and the Samsung Galaxy Tab. Weight: 20%

Points Range:0 (0%) - 15.39 (13.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the features of both the Apple iPad and the Samsung Galaxy Tab.

Points Range:15.4 (14%) - 17.59 (15.99%)

Partially compared and contrasted the features of both the Apple iPad and the Samsung Galaxy Tab.

Points Range:17.6 (16%) - 19.79 (17.99%)

Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the features of both the Apple iPad and the Samsung Galaxy Tab.

Points Range:19.8 (18%) - 22 (20%)

Thoroughly compared and contrasted the features of both the Apple iPad and the Samsung Galaxy Tab.

CIS512-A3-2 2. Compare and contrast the available accessories, potential for future upgrades, warranties, and available support of both the iPad and the Galaxy Tab. Weight: 25%

Points Range:0 (0%) - 19.24 (17.49%)

Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the available accessories, potential for future upgrades, warranties, and available support of both the iPad and the Galaxy Tab.

Points Range:19.25 (17.5%) - 21.99 (19.99%)

Partially compared and contrasted the available accessories, potential for future upgrades, warranties, and available support of both the iPad and the Galaxy Tab.

Points Range:22 (20%) - 24.74 (22.49%)

Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the available accessories, potential for future upgrades, warranties, and available support of both the iPad and the Galaxy Tab.

Points Range:24.75 (22.5%) - 27.5 (25%)

Thoroughly compared and contrasted the available accessories, potential for future upgrades, warranties, and available support of both the iPad and the Galaxy Tab.

CIS512-A3-3 3. Recommend the type of user for which the iPad is best suited. Provide a rationale for your response. Weight: 20%

Points Range:0 (0%) - 15.39 (13.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely recommended the type of user for which the iPad is best suited. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Points Range:15.4 (14%) - 17.59 (15.99%)

Partially recommended the type of user for which the iPad is best suited. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Points Range:17.6 (16%) - 19.79 (17.99%)

Satisfactorily recommended the type of user for which the iPad is best suited. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Points Range:19.8 (18%) - 22 (20%)

Thoroughly recommended the type of user for which the iPad is best suited. Thoroughly

CIS512-A3-4 4. Recommend the type of user for which the Galaxy Tab is best suited. Provide a rationale for your response. Weight: 20%

Points Range:0 (0%) - 15.39 (13.99%)

Did not submit or incompletely recommended the type of user for which the Galaxy Tab is best suited. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale for your response.

Points Range:15.4 (14%) - 17.59 (15.99%)

Partially recommended the type of user for which the Galaxy Tab is best suited. Partially provided a rationale for your response.

Points Range:17.6 (16%) - 19.79 (17.99%)

Satisfactorily recommended the type of user for which the Galaxy Tab is best suited. Satisfactorily provided a rationale for your response.

Points Range:19.8 (18%) - 22 (20%)

Thoroughly recommended the type of user for which the Galaxy Tab is best suited. Thoroughly provided a rationale for your response.

CIS512-A3-5 5. 4 references Weight: 5%

Points Range:0 (0%) - 3.84 (3.49%)

No references provided.

Points Range:3.85 (3.5%) - 4.39 (3.99%)

Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.

Points Range:4.4 (4%) - 4.94 (4.49%)

Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Points Range:4.95 (4.5%) - 5.5 (5%)

Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

CIS512-A3-6 6. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%

Points Range:0 (0%) - 7.69 (6.99%)

More than 6 errors present

Points Range:7.7 (7%) - 8.79 (7.99%)

5-6 errors present

Points Range:8.8 (8%) - 9.89 (8.99%)

3-4 errors present

Points Range:9.9 (9%) - 11 (10%)

0-2 errors present

Name:CIS512 Week 9 Assignment 3: Apple versus Samsung

Description:CIS512 Week 9 Assignment 3: Apple versus Samsung

Bottom of Form

Exit

Exit